>This is an extract from Epson's "Dye" and "Pigment" inks MSDS >for the Epson Stylus 1400. Look at the colour coded MSDS statements >this is supposed to be a dye ink and the Colourants should >completely solubilise in water. >Pigments and Particles don't dissolve in water. >The same thing goes for the Ultra-Chromes in reverse, And yet the MSDSs look essentially the same. They claim UC is completely soluble. >that Ink also contains both dye and Pigments. That's one of the questions I have. Does it really contain dyes -- other than the "dye stacks" that are one characterization of the pigments we use. > If this is correct then these MSDS's are not truthful - > or Epson's advertising is not truthful ... Yes, that's sort of what I'm getting at. >... the EU "Reach Agreement"... > I posted the web access to the Reach Agreement the other day. Could you re-post that? I think I missed it. As far as I know, the Epson MSDSs are all at http://www.epson.com/cgi-bin/Store/support/Supportmsdsmain.jsp? Paul
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Epson's court victory
2007-11-03 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.