Arthur Entlich did a long essay on the Epson Printers forum yesterday discussing the Epson cartridge chips and their low ink warnings. Essentially, all the printer can tell you is an estimate of the ink remaining based on its assumptions about how much ink was used. It is a rough estimate at best. For example, Art suggests that the printers can print dots of various sizes as called for by the driver, but the ink counter probably only uses an average dot size when figuring ink usage. Cleaning cycles are assumed to use all the ink that would flow through an unrestricted nozzle, but if you're cleaning to clear a blocked nozzle(s) and no ink is getting through, the printer still assumes you're flushing a "normal" amount from the cartridge each time. It is possible, if you have a really clogged head, to put in a new cartridge and run cleaning cycles to the point where the printer calculates that your cartridge is empty, even though in fact NO ink has been removed from it because of the clog. Still, the chip on the cartridge will be written as "empty" and the cartridge will no longer function in any printer unless you can reset it somehow. This is not necessarily a criticism of Epson, given that the cost of an actual ink measurement system would probably be prohibitively expensive to install in the level of printers that Epson wants to sell by the million. I believe Epson was hammered in their class action because their assumptions built into the ink usage calculations were designed so that even with perfectly "normal" usage the customer still was told to throw away the cartridge when there were /substantial/ amounts of ink left. I do think the Canon system (in their BCI-6 cartridges - don't know if the newer printers still use it) was the far better way to go - the printer calculates usage, and displays estimated ink levels in each cartridge as you go, but the low ink warning is only triggered by an optical sensor which can tell when the ink reservoir is empty, meaning the only ink left is that in the sponge section. Cheers, Kip Bob Frost wrote: > Not sure what printer you are using, but my Epson R2400 gives me much more > useful info than you suggest. > > <snip> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] I thought the political crap was done with
2007-11-06 by Kip Babington
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.