Actually, it's only silly if EPSON isn't using the "ink-estimation
advantages" of their anti-competition chip to transparently and falsely
justify the chip itself, or to base the patenting of the chip upon.
EPSON has chosen to use that "counting feature" as a design and more
importantly, LEGAL, rationale for the chip itself.
Since EPSON DOES justify the chip on those features... Only an apologist
for "however I figure out to make money is ok" would fail to see the
difference.
Bob Frost wrote:
>> Given that the actual liquid ink costs just about zero, it's cheaper just
>> to
>> put in some extra ink than to device a more expensive mechanism that
>> measures the remaining ink instead of estimating it. The only "cost" is
>> that
>> people see the extra ink, and ignorantly decide that it was put there for
>> the purpose of somehow ripping them off. The whole thing is silly.
>>
>
> Agreed, Paul.
>
> Bob Frost.
>
>
--
Keith Krebs
"Just some guy," caretaker of the Multiverse's largest EPSON printer
User Community (highly recommended by Vogon Poets and MegaDodo
Publications), at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EPSON_Printers/
and the Multiverse's largest Canon printer User Community at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Canon-printers
"For the rest of you out there, the secret is to bang the rocks together
guys"
****************************************************************
CONFIDENTIALITY & COPYRIGHT NOTICE:
This e-mail message, including attachments and contents, is © Copyright,
Keith Krebs, 2001-2007, All Rights Reserved. It is expressly for the
sole use of the intended recipient and may contain confidential and
privileged information. Absent the express written authorization of the
author, any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, transfer, or
distribution is explicitly prohibited and taken at your own risk. If you
are not, or are unsure whether you are, the intended recipient, please
contact the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the original
message. Violations will be prosecuted to the FULL extent allowed under
applicable civil and criminal law. Imagery published or distributed in
violation of these conditions shall be subject to a $1500/image
liquidated damages charge, in addition to any applicable Copyright
violation penalties.
POV IMage Service Banner
****************************************************************
{ The P.O.V. Image Service Website is still at http://www.p-o-v-image.com/ }
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]Message
Re: [Digital BW] I thought the political crap was done with
2007-11-06 by Editor, P.O.V. Image Service
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.