Perhaps the way Epson shuld go is to charge a realistic price for their printers and the same for their inks, rather than subsidising one withthe other. Low useage amateurs would be worse off while professional printers would be better off, but at least there would then be totally open transparency (to mix my metaphors). It would also sort out the "Contemptibles" market, as one would know that anything looking too cheap IS too cheap, and so to be avoided. Whether Canon and HP would follow suit is another matter of course .... My two pennyworth ... Tony Wells. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Kale" <stevekale@...> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2007 1:19 PM Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re:MIS Newsletter What\ufffds wrong with a company (anyone) wanting to protect and generate a return from its intellectual capital? Nothing wrong with shopping around for a free lunch but you should be happy you had a free lunch this far. From: sinwen <sinwen@...> Being too greedy is a nice way to kill your market. In the first place if the price of the original inks were reasonable, compatible market would not be that strong or won't even exist.
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re:MIS Newsletter
2007-11-10 by Tony Wells
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.