Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

MIS Newsletter

MIS Newsletter

2007-11-09 by Stephen Kobrin

Am I correct in reading today's MIS Newsletter to say that they will
no longer honor orders for Epson compatible cartridges -- either
filled or empty, but they will continue to sell refill kits including
the ink and tools necessary to fill the carts?  That would mean that
if you do not now have the cartridges, you will not be able to get
them from MIS.  However, if you have or can get the refillable carts,
you still would be in business.  Any ideas about what that means for
chip resetters?

Steve

RE: [Digital BW] MIS Newsletter

2007-11-09 by Paul Roark

As I understand MIS, they are going to be very cautious.  So, no more carts
until the dust settles.  Assuming Epson prevails, MIS will not be selling
carts until it can obtain ones that are not covered by the Epson patents.

 

If carts are purchased on eBay or otherwise available, then MIS will sell
the inks.  I think they'll also sell all the necessary accessories.  I'm not
aware of any prohibitions relating to re-filling existing carts from any
source.

 

For those of us who have carts, it's business as usual.  For new customers,
they'll have to get the carts from somewhere else.

 

Hopefully the forum members will be able to help prospective B&W ink users
with information needed to get the carts.

 

Paul

www.PaulRoark.com <http://www.paulroark.com/>  

 

 

  _____  
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Stephen
Kobrin
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 2:02 PM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Digital BW] MIS Newsletter

 

Am I correct in reading today's MIS Newsletter to say that they will
no longer honor orders for Epson compatible cartridges -- either
filled or empty, but they will continue to sell refill kits including
the ink and tools necessary to fill the carts? That would mean that
if you do not now have the cartridges, you will not be able to get
them from MIS. However, if you have or can get the refillable carts,
you still would be in business. Any ideas about what that means for
chip resetters?

Steve

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: MIS Newsletter

2007-11-09 by jimbeaujack

And to think, I was going to place an order next week to replace the
four leaky MIS cartridges I've got for my R2400. Grrrr.... If anyone
hears about a new vendor, shout it out. I live in New Zealand.  - Jim

Re: MIS Newsletter

2007-11-09 by the_des_bois

I just bought - as a just in case backup - a set of R1800 spongeless
empty carts with autoreset chips from:

http://www.inkjetcarts.us/servlet/StoreFront

I cannot find the R1800 empty cart set using their website search. I
found it using Google. You might email them to ask about the R2400.
The R1800 set of 8 empty carts was priced at around 30$US.

Have not received them yet so I cannot comment on quality.

Good luck!

Denis

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "jimbeaujack"
<yojimbo@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> And to think, I was going to place an order next week to replace the
> four leaky MIS cartridges I've got for my R2400. Grrrr.... If anyone
> hears about a new vendor, shout it out. I live in New Zealand.  - Jim
>

Re: MIS Newsletter

2007-11-10 by JensGerbitz

>If anyone hears about a new vendor, shout it out. I live in New 
>Zealand.  - Jim

Someone posted a HKG supplier's website address a couple of days 
ago:   www.efillink.com.  I haven't ordered from them before 
(although that may now change even though I'm in Canada) but the site 
looks professionally done and the CIS system they have looks 
realtively sophisticated, so they may be worth a shot.

If anyone on the list has had experience with these guys, please let 
us know.

Thanks-
Jens

Re: MIS Newsletter

2007-11-10 by Manuel Toledo

I got empty carts from inkjetcarts a few months ago. They can be
refilled in the printer, and this makes them very easy to use.
However, after a few weeks I started getting some ink from the magenta
channel into the yellow (I think due to a leak) and removed them. I
went back to my old set of MIS carts and the problem went away. 

Since them I found the courage to install a low-cost CIS that I got
from ebay. It has been working well for about a month. I am thinking
about getting another CIS and save it for future use. 

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "the_des_bois"
<thedesbois@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> I just bought - as a just in case backup - a set of R1800 spongeless
> empty carts with autoreset chips from:
> 
> http://www.inkjetcarts.us/servlet/StoreFront
> 
> I cannot find the R1800 empty cart set using their website search. I
> found it using Google. You might email them to ask about the R2400.
> The R1800 set of 8 empty carts was priced at around 30$US.
> 
> Have not received them yet so I cannot comment on quality.
> 
> Good luck!
> 
> Denis
> 
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "jimbeaujack"
> <yojimbo@> wrote:
> >
> > And to think, I was going to place an order next week to replace the
> > four leaky MIS cartridges I've got for my R2400. Grrrr.... If anyone
> > hears about a new vendor, shout it out. I live in New Zealand.  - Jim
> >
>

Re: [Digital BW] Re: MIS Newsletter

2007-11-10 by mehrdad

so the only thing this did was to shift the sales to china directly
via ebay or other web stores. what did epson get out of this, not a
whole lot

On Nov 9, 2007 4:41 PM, Manuel Toledo <mtoledo@...> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  I got empty carts from inkjetcarts a few months ago. They can be
>  refilled in the printer, and this makes them very easy to use.
>  However, after a few weeks I started getting some ink from the magenta
>  channel into the yellow (I think due to a leak) and removed them. I
>  went back to my old set of MIS carts and the problem went away.
>
>  Since them I found the courage to install a low-cost CIS that I got
>  from ebay. It has been working well for about a month. I am thinking
>  about getting another CIS and save it for future use.
>
>  --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "the_des_bois"
>
>
>  <thedesbois@...> wrote:
>  >
>  > I just bought - as a just in case backup - a set of R1800 spongeless
>  > empty carts with autoreset chips from:
>  >
>  > http://www.inkjetcarts.us/servlet/StoreFront
>  >
>  > I cannot find the R1800 empty cart set using their website search. I
>  > found it using Google. You might email them to ask about the R2400.
>  > The R1800 set of 8 empty carts was priced at around 30$US.
>  >
>  > Have not received them yet so I cannot comment on quality.
>  >
>  > Good luck!
>  >
>  > Denis
>  >
>  > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "jimbeaujack"
>  > <yojimbo@> wrote:
>  > >
>  > > And to think, I was going to place an order next week to replace the
>  > > four leaky MIS cartridges I've got for my R2400. Grrrr.... If anyone
>  > > hears about a new vendor, shout it out. I live in New Zealand. - Jim
>  > >
>  >
>
>
>
>  



-- 
  -------------------------------------
  regards, mehrdad

Re:MIS Newsletter

2007-11-10 by sinwen

To me it means my next printer won't be an Epson, that simple.
The day I won't be able to refill my carts, I will be gone to another brand. 
And to begin, I won't buy any more any Epson paper.
Being too greedy is a nice way to kill your market. In the first place if the
price of the original inks were reasonable, compatible market would not
be that strong or won't even exist.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] Re:MIS Newsletter

2007-11-10 by Steve Kale

What¹s wrong with a company (anyone) wanting to protect and generate a
return from its intellectual capital?  Nothing wrong with shopping around
for a free lunch but you should be happy you had a free lunch this far.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: sinwen <sinwen@...>

Being too greedy is a nice way to kill your market. In the first place if
the
price of the original inks were reasonable, compatible market would not
be that strong or won't even exist.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 
      
   


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] Re:MIS Newsletter

2007-11-10 by Tony Wells

Perhaps the way Epson shuld go is to charge a realistic price for their 
printers and the same for their inks, rather than subsidising one withthe 
other. Low useage amateurs would be worse off while professional printers 
would be better off, but at least there would then be totally open 
transparency (to mix my metaphors). It would also sort out the 
"Contemptibles" market, as one would know that anything looking too cheap IS 
too cheap, and so to be avoided. Whether Canon and HP would follow suit is 
another matter of course ....

My two pennyworth ...

Tony Wells.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steve Kale" <stevekale@...>
To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2007 1:19 PM
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re:MIS Newsletter


What\ufffds wrong with a company (anyone) wanting to protect and generate a
return from its intellectual capital?  Nothing wrong with shopping around
for a free lunch but you should be happy you had a free lunch this far.



From: sinwen <sinwen@...>

Being too greedy is a nice way to kill your market. In the first place if
the
price of the original inks were reasonable, compatible market would not
be that strong or won't even exist.

RE: [Digital BW] Re:MIS Newsletter

2007-11-10 by Paul Roark

(Some rambling thoughts ...)

Steve Kale wrote, in part:

>>What¹s wrong with a company (anyone) wanting to protect and 
>>generate a return from its intellectual capital? 

That's indirectly one of the legal issues: How far does the protection
(legal monopoly) extend?  Several courts have stated that the monopoly does
not extend into adjacent markets, including after market replacement parts,
which seems similar to aftermarket ink sales.

>>Nothing wrong with shopping around for a free lunch but 
>>you should be happy you had a free lunch this far.

I don't want to see Epson damaged by this any more than I want to see the
aftermarket ink and cartridge sellers damaged.  I think the challenge here
is to come up with a win-win strategy. I agree we should not expect to free
ride on anyone, and at the low end we probably have been. 

Being realistic, what may happen is that Epson's actions will cut off the
mass market of cheap, pre-filled carts, while more sophisticated and
determined people -- including probably the real photo enthusiasts as
opposed to average snap shooters -- will find ways to circumvent the
problem, such as buying the empty carts on eBay or from an oversees seller
and re-filling.  Re-filling carts seems like a problem Epson will have to
fight by making the carts very re-fill un-friendly.  Blocking all the
easy-refill carts from overseas will probably be too expensive to bother
with.


Tony Wells wrote, in part:

>... Low useage amateurs would be worse off while professional 
>printers would be better off,

In the original IBM case where their tying of punch card sales to the
business machines was declared an illegal "tying" agreement, the economic
justification for the IBM conduct was said to be that the punch cards were a
method of "metering" usage.  The way the high volume users paid more than
the low volume users, which seemed like a fair way to more closely equate
price with the value of the machine to the user.

If the scenario of the more sophisticated people more easily getting around
the ban happens, it may end up that the higher volume users in the real
world figure out how to avoid the meter, while the less sophisticated pay
the premium.

I have assumed Epson, in fact, is not selling the more sophisticated
machines at a loss.  The Epson rep who visited me the week before they filed
the ITC matter seemed mostly concerned with the low end.  The 220 was the
printer we discussed the most in this regard.  He stated Epson lost money on
those sales, and to compound the damage, the 220 was so good it was seen as
cannibalizing the sales of the profitable, more expensive printers.

While B&W ink sales are hardly the main focus of Epson's concern, I'd be
rather happy to see a solution that allowed Epson to compete head to head
with the others that are doing this same thing at the 260 level (letter or
A4 size) if the 13" or 1800-2400 and up level was wide open.

Epson has made some fine printers for our purposes.  I hope they continue to
do so.  It would sure be nice if both sides saw each other as partners as
opposed to adversaries.  

As a Hasselblad rep once said to me: photographers tend to be creative and
cheap.  I can't see Epson succeeding in keeping at least the B&W enthusiasts
in their proprietary, expensive box.  It's just not going to happen.

Paul
www.PaulRoark.com

Re: [Digital BW] Re:MIS Newsletter

2007-11-10 by Mark Savoia

With all the software hacking and computer viruses in this world,  
does anyone think that a "firmware solution" will be created by a  
smart programer to trick the Epsons into thinking their carts are in  
the printer and thus allow the third party ink/cart makers to make  
some cart/chip that does not infringe on Epson? Fight fire with fire?  
It would certainly take years for Epson to get around that. Perhaps a  
CIS that connects directly into the ink lines, no carts at all.

Mark
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Nov 10, 2007, at 11:26 AM, Paul Roark wrote:

> (Some rambling thoughts ...)
>
> Steve Kale wrote, in part:
>
>>> What¹s wrong with a company (anyone) wanting to protect and
>>> generate a return from its intellectual capital?
>
> That's indirectly one of the legal issues: How far does the protection
> (legal monopoly) extend?  Several courts have stated that the  
> monopoly does
> not extend into adjacent markets, including after market  
> replacement parts,
> which seems similar to aftermarket ink sales.
>
>>> Nothing wrong with shopping around for a free lunch but
>>> you should be happy you had a free lunch this far.
>
> I don't want to see Epson damaged by this any more than I want to  
> see the
> aftermarket ink and cartridge sellers damaged.  I think the  
> challenge here
> is to come up with a win-win strategy. I agree we should not expect  
> to free
> ride on anyone, and at the low end we probably have been.
>
> Being realistic, what may happen is that Epson's actions will cut  
> off the
> mass market of cheap, pre-filled carts, while more sophisticated and
> determined people -- including probably the real photo enthusiasts as
> opposed to average snap shooters -- will find ways to circumvent the
> problem, such as buying the empty carts on eBay or from an oversees  
> seller
> and re-filling.  Re-filling carts seems like a problem Epson will  
> have to
> fight by making the carts very re-fill un-friendly.  Blocking all the
> easy-refill carts from overseas will probably be too expensive to  
> bother
> with.
>
>
> Tony Wells wrote, in part:
>
>> ... Low useage amateurs would be worse off while professional
>> printers would be better off,
>
> In the original IBM case where their tying of punch card sales to the
> business machines was declared an illegal "tying" agreement, the  
> economic
> justification for the IBM conduct was said to be that the punch  
> cards were a
> method of "metering" usage.  The way the high volume users paid  
> more than
> the low volume users, which seemed like a fair way to more closely  
> equate
> price with the value of the machine to the user.
>
> If the scenario of the more sophisticated people more easily  
> getting around
> the ban happens, it may end up that the higher volume users in the  
> real
> world figure out how to avoid the meter, while the less  
> sophisticated pay
> the premium.
>
> I have assumed Epson, in fact, is not selling the more sophisticated
> machines at a loss.  The Epson rep who visited me the week before  
> they filed
> the ITC matter seemed mostly concerned with the low end.  The 220  
> was the
> printer we discussed the most in this regard.  He stated Epson lost  
> money on
> those sales, and to compound the damage, the 220 was so good it was  
> seen as
> cannibalizing the sales of the profitable, more expensive printers.
>
> While B&W ink sales are hardly the main focus of Epson's concern,  
> I'd be
> rather happy to see a solution that allowed Epson to compete head  
> to head
> with the others that are doing this same thing at the 260 level  
> (letter or
> A4 size) if the 13" or 1800-2400 and up level was wide open.
>
> Epson has made some fine printers for our purposes.  I hope they  
> continue to
> do so.  It would sure be nice if both sides saw each other as  
> partners as
> opposed to adversaries.
>
> As a Hasselblad rep once said to me: photographers tend to be  
> creative and
> cheap.  I can't see Epson succeeding in keeping at least the B&W  
> enthusiasts
> in their proprietary, expensive box.  It's just not going to happen.
>
> Paul
> www.PaulRoark.com
>
>
>
>
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other  
> resources as they are often being updated.
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
>
> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you  
> wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by  
> visiting this same page.
>
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages  
> to keep them short.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or  
> flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed  
> from the membership without notice.
> - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital  
> B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be  
> removed from the membership.
> - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules  
> and guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the  
> group Owner and Moderators. See “Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines”  
> in the Files section:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/
>
> BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE  
> PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE  
> “OWNER” AND “MODERATORS” OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL  
> NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL,  
> CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO,  
> DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER  
> INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE  “OWNER” AND “MODERATORS” OF DIGITAL  
> BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF  
> SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE  
> THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO  
> OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR  
> CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO  
> GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE  
> PRINT YAHOO GROUP.
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>

RE: [Digital BW] Re:MIS Newsletter

2007-11-10 by Eric Neilsen

Mark, I have heard about a new attempt that might be implemented by Epson.
Similar to how you can track a computer, either just the HD or the processor
#, Epson will track the carts by id. When that cart has been used up, no
amount of re chipping will allow it to show ink again. 



Eric Neilsen Photography
4101 Commerce Street
Suite 9
Dallas, TX 75226
http://e.neilsen.home.att.net
http://ericneilsenphotography.com
Skype ejprinter
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> -----Original Message-----
> From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Mark
> Savoia
> Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2007 10:41 AM
> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re:MIS Newsletter
> 
> With all the software hacking and computer viruses in this world,
> does anyone think that a "firmware solution" will be created by a
> smart programer to trick the Epsons into thinking their carts are in
> the printer and thus allow the third party ink/cart makers to make
> some cart/chip that does not infringe on Epson? Fight fire with fire?
> It would certainly take years for Epson to get around that. Perhaps a
> CIS that connects directly into the ink lines, no carts at all.
> 
> Mark
> 
> On Nov 10, 2007, at 11:26 AM, Paul Roark wrote:
> 
> > (Some rambling thoughts ...)
> >
> > Steve Kale wrote, in part:
> >
> >>> What¹s wrong with a company (anyone) wanting to protect and
> >>> generate a return from its intellectual capital?
> >
> > That's indirectly one of the legal issues: How far does the protection
> > (legal monopoly) extend?  Several courts have stated that the
> > monopoly does
> > not extend into adjacent markets, including after market
> > replacement parts,
> > which seems similar to aftermarket ink sales.
> >
> >>> Nothing wrong with shopping around for a free lunch but
> >>> you should be happy you had a free lunch this far.
> >
> > I don't want to see Epson damaged by this any more than I want to
> > see the
> > aftermarket ink and cartridge sellers damaged.  I think the
> > challenge here
> > is to come up with a win-win strategy. I agree we should not expect
> > to free
> > ride on anyone, and at the low end we probably have been.
> >
> > Being realistic, what may happen is that Epson's actions will cut
> > off the
> > mass market of cheap, pre-filled carts, while more sophisticated and
> > determined people -- including probably the real photo enthusiasts as
> > opposed to average snap shooters -- will find ways to circumvent the
> > problem, such as buying the empty carts on eBay or from an oversees
> > seller
> > and re-filling.  Re-filling carts seems like a problem Epson will
> > have to
> > fight by making the carts very re-fill un-friendly.  Blocking all the
> > easy-refill carts from overseas will probably be too expensive to
> > bother
> > with.
> >
> >
> > Tony Wells wrote, in part:
> >
> >> ... Low useage amateurs would be worse off while professional
> >> printers would be better off,
> >
> > In the original IBM case where their tying of punch card sales to the
> > business machines was declared an illegal "tying" agreement, the
> > economic
> > justification for the IBM conduct was said to be that the punch
> > cards were a
> > method of "metering" usage.  The way the high volume users paid
> > more than
> > the low volume users, which seemed like a fair way to more closely
> > equate
> > price with the value of the machine to the user.
> >
> > If the scenario of the more sophisticated people more easily
> > getting around
> > the ban happens, it may end up that the higher volume users in the
> > real
> > world figure out how to avoid the meter, while the less
> > sophisticated pay
> > the premium.
> >
> > I have assumed Epson, in fact, is not selling the more sophisticated
> > machines at a loss.  The Epson rep who visited me the week before
> > they filed
> > the ITC matter seemed mostly concerned with the low end.  The 220
> > was the
> > printer we discussed the most in this regard.  He stated Epson lost
> > money on
> > those sales, and to compound the damage, the 220 was so good it was
> > seen as
> > cannibalizing the sales of the profitable, more expensive printers.
> >
> > While B&W ink sales are hardly the main focus of Epson's concern,
> > I'd be
> > rather happy to see a solution that allowed Epson to compete head
> > to head
> > with the others that are doing this same thing at the 260 level
> > (letter or
> > A4 size) if the 13" or 1800-2400 and up level was wide open.
> >
> > Epson has made some fine printers for our purposes.  I hope they
> > continue to
> > do so.  It would sure be nice if both sides saw each other as
> > partners as
> > opposed to adversaries.
> >
> > As a Hasselblad rep once said to me: photographers tend to be
> > creative and
> > cheap.  I can't see Epson succeeding in keeping at least the B&W
> > enthusiasts
> > in their proprietary, expensive box.  It's just not going to happen.
> >
> > Paul
> > www.PaulRoark.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other
> > resources as they are often being updated.
> >
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> >
> > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you
> > wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by
> > visiting this same page.
> >
> > Please follow these basic guidelines:
> > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages
> > to keep them short.
> > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or
> > flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed
> > from the membership without notice.
> > - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital
> > B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be
> > removed from the membership.
> > - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules
> > and guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the
> > group Owner and Moderators. See “Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines”
> > in the Files section:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/
> >
> > BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE
> > PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE
> > “OWNER” AND “MODERATORS” OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL
> > NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL,
> > CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO,
> > DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER
> > INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE  “OWNER” AND “MODERATORS” OF DIGITAL
> > BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF
> > SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE
> > THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO
> > OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR
> > CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO
> > GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE
> > PRINT YAHOO GROUP.
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as
> they are often being updated.
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> 
> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to
> unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same
> page.
> 
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep
> them short.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames.
> Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the
> membership without notice.
> - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W
> printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from
> the membership.
> - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and
> guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner
> and Moderators. See “Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines” in the Files
> section:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/
> 
> BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT
> YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE “OWNER” AND
> “MODERATORS” OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO
> YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR
> EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF
> PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE
> “OWNER” AND “MODERATORS” OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN
> ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE
> OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii)
> UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii)
> STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT
> YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE
> PRINT YAHOO GROUP.
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
>

Re: [Digital BW] Re:MIS Newsletter

2007-11-10 by Mark Savoia

This means war!
:)
Mark
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Nov 10, 2007, at 12:13 PM, Eric Neilsen wrote:

> Mark, I have heard about a new attempt that might be implemented by  
> Epson.
> Similar to how you can track a computer, either just the HD or the  
> processor
> #, Epson will track the carts by id. When that cart has been used  
> up, no
> amount of re chipping will allow it to show ink again.
>
>
>
> Eric Neilsen Photography
> 4101 Commerce Street
> Suite 9
> Dallas, TX 75226
> http://e.neilsen.home.att.net
> http://ericneilsenphotography.com
> Skype ejprinter
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
>> [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of  
>> Mark
>> Savoia
>> Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2007 10:41 AM
>> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
>> Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re:MIS Newsletter
>>
>> With all the software hacking and computer viruses in this world,
>> does anyone think that a "firmware solution" will be created by a
>> smart programer to trick the Epsons into thinking their carts are in
>> the printer and thus allow the third party ink/cart makers to make
>> some cart/chip that does not infringe on Epson? Fight fire with fire?
>> It would certainly take years for Epson to get around that. Perhaps a
>> CIS that connects directly into the ink lines, no carts at all.
>>
>> Mark
>>
>> On Nov 10, 2007, at 11:26 AM, Paul Roark wrote:
>>
>>> (Some rambling thoughts ...)
>>>
>>> Steve Kale wrote, in part:
>>>
>>>>> What¹s wrong with a company (anyone) wanting to protect and
>>>>> generate a return from its intellectual capital?
>>>
>>> That's indirectly one of the legal issues: How far does the  
>>> protection
>>> (legal monopoly) extend?  Several courts have stated that the
>>> monopoly does
>>> not extend into adjacent markets, including after market
>>> replacement parts,
>>> which seems similar to aftermarket ink sales.
>>>
>>>>> Nothing wrong with shopping around for a free lunch but
>>>>> you should be happy you had a free lunch this far.
>>>
>>> I don't want to see Epson damaged by this any more than I want to
>>> see the
>>> aftermarket ink and cartridge sellers damaged.  I think the
>>> challenge here
>>> is to come up with a win-win strategy. I agree we should not expect
>>> to free
>>> ride on anyone, and at the low end we probably have been.
>>>
>>> Being realistic, what may happen is that Epson's actions will cut
>>> off the
>>> mass market of cheap, pre-filled carts, while more sophisticated and
>>> determined people -- including probably the real photo  
>>> enthusiasts as
>>> opposed to average snap shooters -- will find ways to circumvent the
>>> problem, such as buying the empty carts on eBay or from an oversees
>>> seller
>>> and re-filling.  Re-filling carts seems like a problem Epson will
>>> have to
>>> fight by making the carts very re-fill un-friendly.  Blocking all  
>>> the
>>> easy-refill carts from overseas will probably be too expensive to
>>> bother
>>> with.
>>>
>>>
>>> Tony Wells wrote, in part:
>>>
>>>> ... Low useage amateurs would be worse off while professional
>>>> printers would be better off,
>>>
>>> In the original IBM case where their tying of punch card sales to  
>>> the
>>> business machines was declared an illegal "tying" agreement, the
>>> economic
>>> justification for the IBM conduct was said to be that the punch
>>> cards were a
>>> method of "metering" usage.  The way the high volume users paid
>>> more than
>>> the low volume users, which seemed like a fair way to more closely
>>> equate
>>> price with the value of the machine to the user.
>>>
>>> If the scenario of the more sophisticated people more easily
>>> getting around
>>> the ban happens, it may end up that the higher volume users in the
>>> real
>>> world figure out how to avoid the meter, while the less
>>> sophisticated pay
>>> the premium.
>>>
>>> I have assumed Epson, in fact, is not selling the more sophisticated
>>> machines at a loss.  The Epson rep who visited me the week before
>>> they filed
>>> the ITC matter seemed mostly concerned with the low end.  The 220
>>> was the
>>> printer we discussed the most in this regard.  He stated Epson lost
>>> money on
>>> those sales, and to compound the damage, the 220 was so good it was
>>> seen as
>>> cannibalizing the sales of the profitable, more expensive printers.
>>>
>>> While B&W ink sales are hardly the main focus of Epson's concern,
>>> I'd be
>>> rather happy to see a solution that allowed Epson to compete head
>>> to head
>>> with the others that are doing this same thing at the 260 level
>>> (letter or
>>> A4 size) if the 13" or 1800-2400 and up level was wide open.
>>>
>>> Epson has made some fine printers for our purposes.  I hope they
>>> continue to
>>> do so.  It would sure be nice if both sides saw each other as
>>> partners as
>>> opposed to adversaries.
>>>
>>> As a Hasselblad rep once said to me: photographers tend to be
>>> creative and
>>> cheap.  I can't see Epson succeeding in keeping at least the B&W
>>> enthusiasts
>>> in their proprietary, expensive box.  It's just not going to happen.
>>>
>>> Paul
>>> www.PaulRoark.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other
>>> resources as they are often being updated.
>>>
>>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
>>>
>>> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you
>>> wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by
>>> visiting this same page.
>>>
>>> Please follow these basic guidelines:
>>> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages
>>> to keep them short.
>>> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or
>>> flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed
>>> from the membership without notice.
>>> - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital
>>> B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be
>>> removed from the membership.
>>> - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules
>>> and guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the
>>> group Owner and Moderators. See “Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines”
>>> in the Files section:
>>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/
>>>
>>> BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE
>>> PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE
>>> “OWNER” AND “MODERATORS” OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL
>>> NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL,
>>> CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO,
>>> DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER
>>> INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE  “OWNER” AND “MODERATORS” OF DIGITAL
>>> BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF
>>> SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE
>>> THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO
>>> OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR
>>> CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO
>>> GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE
>>> PRINT YAHOO GROUP.
>>>
>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other  
>> resources as
>> they are often being updated.
>>
>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
>>
>> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you  
>> wish to
>> unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting  
>> this same
>> page.
>>
>> Please follow these basic guidelines:
>> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages  
>> to keep
>> them short.
>> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or  
>> flames.
>> Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the
>> membership without notice.
>> - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of  
>> digital B&W
>> printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be  
>> removed from
>> the membership.
>> - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and
>> guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group  
>> Owner
>> and Moderators. See “Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines” in the Files
>> section:
>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/
>>
>> BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE  
>> PRINT
>> YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE “OWNER” AND
>> “MODERATORS” OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE  
>> LIABLE TO
>> YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR
>> EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF
>> PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE
>> “OWNER” AND “MODERATORS” OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE  
>> BEEN
>> ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i)  
>> THE USE
>> OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii)
>> UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR  
>> DATA; (iii)
>> STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT
>> YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE
>> PRINT YAHOO GROUP.
>>
>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other  
> resources as they are often being updated.
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
>
> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you  
> wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by  
> visiting this same page.
>
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages  
> to keep them short.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or  
> flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed  
> from the membership without notice.
> - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital  
> B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be  
> removed from the membership.
> - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules  
> and guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the  
> group Owner and Moderators. See “Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines”  
> in the Files section:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/
>
> BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE  
> PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE  
> “OWNER” AND “MODERATORS” OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL  
> NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL,  
> CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO,  
> DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER  
> INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE  “OWNER” AND “MODERATORS” OF DIGITAL  
> BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF  
> SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE  
> THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO  
> OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR  
> CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO  
> GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE  
> PRINT YAHOO GROUP.
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>

Re: [Digital BW] Re:MIS Newsletter

2007-11-10 by Tony Wells

Just to pick up on one point here Mr Roark, though not contentiously. Here 
in the UK the car manufacturers have either a 2 or 3 year absolute monolpoly 
of spare parts for any new car model they introduce, before the third party 
suppliers can kick in. This is mostly servicing parts such as oil filters 
and also silencers (mufflers?) from what I can gather, by the way. They key 
thing being irrrespective of any monoploy issues that any of the group 
members may have over this, surely a similar situation could apply to 
printer cartridges, whereby such as Epson could be the sole supplier for a 
set period of time when they introduce a new model before the market is up 
for grabs, so as to be able to recoup their development costs? Or don't 
printers last that long? Just an idea to throw into the pot ....

Tony Wells.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Paul Roark" <paul.roark@...>
To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2007 4:26 PM
Subject: RE: [Digital BW] Re:MIS Newsletter


SNIP

Tony Wells wrote, in part:

>... Low useage amateurs would be worse off while professional
>printers would be better off,

In the original IBM case where their tying of punch card sales to the
business machines was declared an illegal "tying" agreement, the economic
justification for the IBM conduct was said to be that the punch cards were a
method of "metering" usage.  The way the high volume users paid more than
the low volume users, which seemed like a fair way to more closely equate
price with the value of the machine to the user.

If the scenario of the more sophisticated people more easily getting around
the ban happens, it may end up that the higher volume users in the real
world figure out how to avoid the meter, while the less sophisticated pay
the premium.

I have assumed Epson, in fact, is not selling the more sophisticated
machines at a loss.  The Epson rep who visited me the week before they filed
the ITC matter seemed mostly concerned with the low end.  The 220 was the
printer we discussed the most in this regard.  He stated Epson lost money on
those sales, and to compound the damage, the 220 was so good it was seen as
cannibalizing the sales of the profitable, more expensive printers.

While B&W ink sales are hardly the main focus of Epson's concern, I'd be
rather happy to see a solution that allowed Epson to compete head to head
with the others that are doing this same thing at the 260 level (letter or
A4 size) if the 13" or 1800-2400 and up level was wide open.

Epson has made some fine printers for our purposes.  I hope they continue to
do so.  It would sure be nice if both sides saw each other as partners as
opposed to adversaries.

As a Hasselblad rep once said to me: photographers tend to be creative and
cheap.  I can't see Epson succeeding in keeping at least the B&W enthusiasts
in their proprietary, expensive box.  It's just not going to happen.

Paul
www.PaulRoark.com

Epson situation, MIS developements, etc..

2007-11-10 by Tyler Boley

with all due respect to everyone's posted opinions here and elsewhere,
it's been a bit frustrating to see on every list I've seen with
threads about this issue, everyone seem to want to discuss the
politics, the principals involved, the law, etc.. On a few lists I
think the ghost of Ayn Rand has been brought back.
All this is intriguing and conversational, however, completely off the
mark, at least in terms of what I see as most urgent.

This process is currently moving forward, because it's in Epson's
perceived best interests to make that happen, and they have the
resources to do apply.

For me, my art, my business, and B&W photographic standards in
general, it is not in my, or our, best interests that the process
completes in Epson's favor. Why is another long post.
I might add that it's apparently against the best interests of others
here we all consider the pillars of the B&W ink community.

Therefore, as long as there remains any chance to impact the outcome,
according to those here with some knowledge about the process, and
they tell us there are things we can do...

DO IT!!!

We can all discuss the principals and law involved around the campfire
some other day.

This concludes today's rant from the Decider

Re: [Digital BW] Epson situation, MIS developements, etc..

2007-11-10 by Dana H. Myers

Tyler Boley wrote:

> Therefore, as long as there remains any chance to impact the outcome,
> according to those here with some knowledge about the process, and
> they tell us there are things we can do...
> 
> DO IT!!!
> 
> We can all discuss the principals and law involved around the campfire
> some other day.

Forgive, but this makes absolutely no sense whatsoever :-)

Impacting the outcome is a matter of business and law; what
makes you think otherwise?

Dana

Re: [Digital BW] Epson situation, MIS developements, etc..

2007-11-10 by Tyler Boley

No, it's how they decide to interpret and apply the law, and that is
as yet not finalized in this case.
Read the posts by Jon and Paul.


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Dana H. Myers"
<dana.myers@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> Tyler Boley wrote:
> 
> > Therefore, as long as there remains any chance to impact the outcome,
> > according to those here with some knowledge about the process, and
> > they tell us there are things we can do...
> > 
> > DO IT!!!
> > 
> > We can all discuss the principals and law involved around the campfire
> > some other day.
> 
> Forgive, but this makes absolutely no sense whatsoever :-)
> 
> Impacting the outcome is a matter of business and law; what
> makes you think otherwise?
> 
> Dana
>

RE: [Digital BW] Epson situation, MIS developements, etc..

2007-11-10 by Robert W Shearer

A: Business: If Epson can make money with what they are doing, they will do
it, if they cannot, they will not. It is up to the customer base to insure
that Epson loses money and it is up to aggressive business practices by
other companies, (read Canon, HP here) to fill the void. Profit is
everything.

B. Law: That battle can be fought but who has pockets deep enough?

By the way who is "they"? The judges, the lawyers, the politicians? Now
there is a trustworthy group. There is nothing in this issue but business
and law. Epson already has their interpretation, the consumers have theirs,
third party manufacturers are certainly espousing an important viewpoint
from their perspective. In short, it all depends on whose ox is getting
gored. Make no mistake, however, this is all about business and law.

 

  _____  
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Tyler
Boley
Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2007 3:33 PM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Epson situation, MIS developements, etc..

 

No, it's how they decide to interpret and apply the law, and that is
as yet not finalized in this case.
Read the posts by Jon and Paul.

--- In DigitalBlackandWhit
<mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com>
eThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Dana H. Myers"
<dana.myers@...> wrote:
>
> Tyler Boley wrote:
> 
> > Therefore, as long as there remains any chance to impact the outcome,
> > according to those here with some knowledge about the process, and
> > they tell us there are things we can do...
> > 
> > DO IT!!!
> > 
> > We can all discuss the principals and law involved around the campfire
> > some other day.
> 
> Forgive, but this makes absolutely no sense whatsoever :-)
> 
> Impacting the outcome is a matter of business and law; what
> makes you think otherwise?
> 
> Dana
>

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] Epson situation, MIS developements, etc..

2007-11-10 by djon43

I hate to defend lawyers and international corporations, but....

This isn't "about business and law" ... it's about entrepreneurs and
Chinese exporters who failed to design their way around something they
knew was lurking. 

It isn't news and Bush isn't going to do ANYTHING on behalf of tiny
businesses that serve "artists."

MIS ain't Enron or Halliburton...but send a check to Tom DeLay and
maybe it will seem that way.

"Quality" is irrelevant. If it was relevant Ford/GM/Chrysler wouldn't
have survived this long. 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
 > Make no mistake, however, this is all about business and law.
> 
>  
>

Re: Epson situation, MIS developements, etc..

2007-11-10 by djon43

I suspect this is a "community" that makes B&W prints more than it is
an "ink" community. 

This "community" will decide to agitate, or not. 

Is it passionate about Epson-targeted alternatives which do not seem
sufficiently reliable/non-destructive for all users?

Are Epson substitutes so wonderful that we can't rebuild our
darkrooms? Or is cheapness the driver? 

Consider: Have you seen many patriots for non-OEM color inks ?





--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Tyler Boley"
<tyler@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> with all due respect to everyone's posted opinions here and elsewhere,
> it's been a bit frustrating to see on every list I've seen with
> threads about this issue, everyone seem to want to discuss the
> politics, the principals involved, the law, etc.. On a few lists I
> think the ghost of Ayn Rand has been brought back.
> All this is intriguing and conversational, however, completely off the
> mark, at least in terms of what I see as most urgent.
> 
> This process is currently moving forward, because it's in Epson's
> perceived best interests to make that happen, and they have the
> resources to do apply.
> 
> For me, my art, my business, and B&W photographic standards in
> general, it is not in my, or our, best interests that the process
> completes in Epson's favor. Why is another long post.
> I might add that it's apparently against the best interests of others
> here we all consider the pillars of the B&W ink community.
> 
> Therefore, as long as there remains any chance to impact the outcome,
> according to those here with some knowledge about the process, and
> they tell us there are things we can do...
> 
> DO IT!!!
> 
> We can all discuss the principals and law involved around the campfire
> some other day.
> 
> This concludes today's rant from the Decider
>

Re: [Digital BW] Epson situation, MIS developements, etc..

2007-11-10 by Tyler Boley

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Dana H. Myers"
<dana.myers@...> wrote:
...
> 
> Forgive, but this makes absolutely no sense whatsoever :-)


by the way Dana... I gave of clinging to the facade of making sense
long ago, as you see it's not my forte.

Tyler

Re: [Digital BW] Re:MIS Newsletter

2007-11-10 by CorrPro96@aol.com

Welcome to Globilization.
Never mind US law.... we're bound now by international trade  agreements.
Globilization was never intended to protect the public or the consumer. The  
hell with Epson... I'm worried about Exxon-Mobile. Get ready fro $4.00  gas.
 
Richard Massie



************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] Epson situation, MIS developements, etc..

2007-11-10 by Bruce Watson

Dana H. Myers wrote:
> Tyler Boley wrote:
>
>   
>> Therefore, as long as there remains any chance to impact the outcome, according to those here with some knowledge about the process, and they tell us there are things we can do...
>>
>> DO IT!!!
>>
>> We can all discuss the principals and law involved around the campfire some other day.
>>     
>
> Forgive, but this makes absolutely no sense whatsoever :-)
>
> Impacting the outcome is a matter of business and law; what
> makes you think otherwise?
>
> Dana
>   
A matter of business? What is business but a transaction between a 
supplier and a consumer? Epson only controls one end of the transaction. 
We control the other end.

A matter of law? What is law but a set of rules governing an activity? 
Laws are but words written on paper. We can change them if we bring 
sufficient will to bear. Even today. Even in what has become modern America.

What doesn't make sense is refusing to make your voice heard. The voice 
of the people is the heart of democracy. Without it all you have is a 
dictatorship.
--
Bruce Watson

RE: [Digital BW] Epson situation, MIS developements, etc..

2007-11-10 by stephengledhill

Hello Tyler,
 
At present the Epson thing is an issue for the US but it will most likely
rear its head in some guise or other here in the UK - and of course
elsewhere on the globe.  I could simply duck out as I use and like the
results I get with the Epson Ultrachrome inks with ABW.  BUT - I want to
retain the choice and options.  I have used Piezo and MIS inks in the past
and may well want to do something similar in future.
 
It seems that as it's presently a US issue there's probably not much I can
contribute on an internal US matter from overseas.  I'll just be ignored ...
"what's it to do with you" I hear.  But am I right?  Or, can you or anyone
else think of a way in which we can support from outside the US.
 
Steve Gledhill
http://www.virtuallygrey.co.uk/


  _____  
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Tyler
Boley
Sent: 10 November 2007 19:47
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Digital BW] Epson situation, MIS developements, etc..



with all due respect to everyone's posted opinions here and elsewhere,
it's been a bit frustrating to see on every list I've seen with
threads about this issue, everyone seem to want to discuss the
politics, the principals involved, the law, etc.. On a few lists I
think the ghost of Ayn Rand has been brought back.
All this is intriguing and conversational, however, completely off the
mark, at least in terms of what I see as most urgent.

This process is currently moving forward, because it's in Epson's
perceived best interests to make that happen, and they have the
resources to do apply.

For me, my art, my business, and B&W photographic standards in
general, it is not in my, or our, best interests that the process
completes in Epson's favor. Why is another long post.
I might add that it's apparently against the best interests of others
here we all consider the pillars of the B&W ink community.

Therefore, as long as there remains any chance to impact the outcome,
according to those here with some knowledge about the process, and
they tell us there are things we can do...

DO IT!!!

We can all discuss the principals and law involved around the campfire
some other day.

This concludes today's rant from the Decider



 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] Re:MIS Newsletter

2007-11-10 by Gary Brown

How is it possible that in the UK that car manufactures have an absolute monopoly for two or three years for spare parts of a newly introduced car  model, when all of the parts are not made in the UK?
Show quoted textHide quoted text
---- Original Message ----- 
  From: Tony Wells 
  To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2007 11:57 AM
  Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re:MIS Newsletter


  Just to pick up on one point here Mr Roark, though not contentiously. Here 
  in the UK the car manufacturers have either a 2 or 3 year absolute monolpoly 
  of spare parts for any new car model they introduce, before the third party 
  suppliers can kick in. This is mostly servicing parts such as oil filters 
  and also silencers (mufflers?) from what I can gather, by the way. They key 
  thing being irrrespective of any monoploy issues that any of the group 
  members may have over this, surely a similar situation could apply to 
  printer cartridges, whereby such as Epson could be the sole supplier for a 
  set period of time when they introduce a new model before the market is up 
  for grabs, so as to be able to recoup their development costs? Or don't 
  printers last that long? Just an idea to throw into the pot ....

  Tony Wells.

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: "Paul Roark" <paul.roark@...>
  To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
  Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2007 4:26 PM
  Subject: RE: [Digital BW] Re:MIS Newsletter

  SNIP

  Tony Wells wrote, in part:

  >... Low useage amateurs would be worse off while professional
  >printers would be better off,

  In the original IBM case where their tying of punch card sales to the
  business machines was declared an illegal "tying" agreement, the economic
  justification for the IBM conduct was said to be that the punch cards were a
  method of "metering" usage. The way the high volume users paid more than
  the low volume users, which seemed like a fair way to more closely equate
  price with the value of the machine to the user.

  If the scenario of the more sophisticated people more easily getting around
  the ban happens, it may end up that the higher volume users in the real
  world figure out how to avoid the meter, while the less sophisticated pay
  the premium.

  I have assumed Epson, in fact, is not selling the more sophisticated
  machines at a loss. The Epson rep who visited me the week before they filed
  the ITC matter seemed mostly concerned with the low end. The 220 was the
  printer we discussed the most in this regard. He stated Epson lost money on
  those sales, and to compound the damage, the 220 was so good it was seen as
  cannibalizing the sales of the profitable, more expensive printers.

  While B&W ink sales are hardly the main focus of Epson's concern, I'd be
  rather happy to see a solution that allowed Epson to compete head to head
  with the others that are doing this same thing at the 260 level (letter or
  A4 size) if the 13" or 1800-2400 and up level was wide open.

  Epson has made some fine printers for our purposes. I hope they continue to
  do so. It would sure be nice if both sides saw each other as partners as
  opposed to adversaries.

  As a Hasselblad rep once said to me: photographers tend to be creative and
  cheap. I can't see Epson succeeding in keeping at least the B&W enthusiasts
  in their proprietary, expensive box. It's just not going to happen.

  Paul
  www.PaulRoark.com



   

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] Epson situation, MIS developements, etc..

2007-11-10 by Stephen Kobrin

There may be another complication in this case that I do not think has
been mentioned.  At its most basic, this is an argument about
protection of intellectual property and the US Government has put a
great deal of pressure on other countries --China and India among many
others -- to control unauthorized reproduction of American products
from movies and music to software and pharmaceuticals. Despite the
logic of much of what has been written here, I suspect it will be
difficult for the ITC to rule against Epson under these circumstances.
 Given the relatively small size of our market, I wonder if licensing
might be the best bet.

I am not arguing "for" Epson, just pessimistic about the outcome.

Steve 
--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "stephengledhill"
<stephengledhill@...> wrote:
>
> Hello Tyler,
>  
> At present the Epson thing is an issue for the US but it will most
likely
> rear its head in some guise or other here in the UK - and of course
> elsewhere on the globe.  I could simply duck out as I use and like the
> results I get with the Epson Ultrachrome inks with ABW.  BUT - I want to
> retain the choice and options.  I have used Piezo and MIS inks in
the past
> and may well want to do something similar in future.
>  
> It seems that as it's presently a US issue there's probably not much
I can
> contribute on an internal US matter from overseas.  I'll just be
ignored ...
> "what's it to do with you" I hear.  But am I right?  Or, can you or
anyone
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> else think of a way in which we can support from outside the US.
>  
> Steve Gledhill
> http://www.virtuallygrey.co.uk/
> 
> 
>   _____

Re: [Digital BW] Epson situation, MIS developements, etc..

2007-11-10 by Mitch Greenwald

In this connection, does anyone know if there have ever been discussions 
about licensing?  Is licensing an option for, say, MIS or Piezography 
(which offer a product which epson does not offer . . . )?  Paul (or 
another knowledgeable person) . . . is Epson required to discuss 
licensing if asked (and, if so, be reasonable in the discussion), or can 
it simply refuse?

Mitch

Stephen Kobrin wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> . .. . ..
>   

>  Given the relatively small size of our market, I wonder if licensing
> might be the best bet.
>
> I am not arguing "for" Epson, just pessimistic about the outcome.
>
> Steve 
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "stephengledhill"
> <stephengledhill@...> wrote:
>   
>

Re: [Digital BW] Epson situation, MIS developements, etc..

2007-11-11 by Tyler Boley

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "stephengledhill"
<stephengledhill@...> wrote:
...
> It seems that as it's presently a US issue there's probably not much
I can
> contribute on an internal US matter from overseas.

Hi Steve, I'm sure you are right, let's hope your willingness inspires
some more colonists.

Other Steve, I'm certainly not optimistic either, far from it. Just
can't seem to stomach the idea of standing back and watching it happen
after all these years of working towards this beautiful process.
Until someone with their finger on the pulse of this case says it's a
done deal, I don't see the harm in spending a few minutes on a letter
or two.
Tyler

[Digital BW] Re:MIS Newsletter

2007-11-11 by Native Texan Photographer

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Mark Savoia 
<mark@...> wrote:
>
> With all the software hacking and computer viruses in this world,  
> does anyone think that a "firmware solution" will be created by a  
> smart programer to trick the Epsons into thinking their carts are 
in  
> the printer and thus allow the third party ink/cart makers to make  
> some cart/chip that does not infringe on Epson? Fight fire with 
fire?  
> It would certainly take years for Epson to get around that. Perhaps 
a  
> CIS that connects directly into the ink lines, no carts at all.
> 
> Mark

Well said, Mark.  I have wondered for the last two years, why a CIS 
unit couldn't be designed and implemented that had a direct hook-up 
to the ink input lines.  The clear top-fill carts for the 3000 is 
nothing more than a square tank with a coupler that matches up with 
the input nozzle on the printer.  Simple.

Uncle Dannie

P.S. I'm not looking for a free lunch, but I will not be buying 
anymore Epson paper.  Just my small attempt at a revolt.  It was 
never about the money for carts from Epson, it was about better, more 
versatel (sp?) applications for ink.

Re: [Digital BW] Re:MIS Newsletter

2007-11-11 by CorrPro96@aol.com

I see that B&H is still selling Pantone ink carts for some of the Epson  
desktop printers. I have used and am currently using Pantone inks and will vouch  
for their accuracy of color gamut. It wouldn't surprise me if Pantone has a  
license from Epson to produce compatible inks for their printers.
 
Richard Massie



************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Digital BW] Re:MIS Newsletter

2007-11-11 by dlruckus

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Native Texan 
OK. Heres an idea for you. Take some IV bags and tubing.Fill them with
ink.Buy 4,6,8, whatever, 3000 dampers and connect to the tubing. Draw
ink through the dampers with a bottom fill adapter. Place dampers over
ink inlets on printer and secure tubes, dampers and bags appropriately.
Have fun. Oh, you will need to put a chip,preferably auto reset,in
place somewhere as well. Who knows. Enthusiasts might end up buying 
all those old 3000s just to get dampers :)

Regards
Duane
 

Photographer" <dhedgpeth@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> > CIS that connects directly into the ink lines, no carts at all.
> > 
> > Mark
> 
> Well said, Mark.  I have wondered for the last two years, why a CIS 
> unit couldn't be designed and implemented that had a direct hook-up 
> to the ink input lines.  The clear top-fill carts for the 3000 is 
> nothing more than a square tank with a coupler that matches up with 
> the input nozzle on the printer.  Simple.
> 
> Uncle Dannie
> 
> P.S. I'm not looking for a free lunch, but I will not be buying 
> anymore Epson paper.  Just my small attempt at a revolt.  It was 
> never about the money for carts from Epson, it was about better, more 
> versatel (sp?) applications for ink.
>

RE: [Digital BW] Epson situation, MIS developements, etc..

2007-11-11 by Paul Roark

>There may be another complication ... the US Government has 
>put a great deal of pressure on other countries --China and 
>India among many others -- to control unauthorized 
> reproduction of American products ...

Yes, and Dr. Susan Schwab, head of the U.S. Trade office and whose court
this ball is now in, is perhaps best known for her book on the trade offs
that take place in similar situations, and has also taught courses in U.S.
trade policy, including U.S./China trade relationships, and published
articles on U.S./Japanese trade relationships.  She's no lightweight or
novice in these things.  Exactly how it all ends up may involve issues we
aren't even aware of.  

However, what we can do is to make sure that the powers that be understand
the facts from our perspective, which may never have been conveyed to them
because we were not parties to these actions.  One of the cases out of my
FTC office was all but won until the other side pulled off a letter-writing
campaign and produced 100 letters opposing the matter -- compared to the one
that was written in favor of it.  The letters carried the day, despite all
the resources that had been poured into sophisticated fact finding, economic
consultants, etc.  

> I wonder if licensing might be the best bet.

It might be.

More generally, if this type of proceeding is similar to what I used to do,
how the order is written could be critical.  For example, an order could
condition enforcement on reasonable licensing.  How one decided what was
reasonable could be partially defined in the order to define where this type
of marketing might be warranted and where it is probably not.  How the
orders are written is a huge part of the whole ball game and where interests
can be balanced such that most parties and consumer get most of what they
need.  Again, though, if we don't make enough noise to be noticed, they
might not even know there are small companies here that are doing a whole
lot more than just making cheap knock-off copies.
.....

>How is it possible that in the UK that car manufactures have 
>an absolute monopoly for two or three years for spare parts 
>of a newly introduced car model, when all of the parts are 
>not made in the UK?

At the FTC we had a series of "crash parts" cases that dealt with that issue
also.  I forget what the settlements involved.  However, I know part of the
politics of it involved the insurance companies that didn't want to pay the
high prices.  So I think we had the insurance companies v. the car
companies.  It was one of those situations where one might want to hand both
parties large guns and ... well never mind.


Paul
www.PaulRoark.com

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Epson situation, MIS developements, etc..

2007-11-11 by CorrPro96@aol.com

In a message dated 11/10/2007 10:43:21 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
djon43@... writes:

This  "community" will decide to agitate, or not. 

Is it passionate about  Epson-targeted alternatives which do not seem
sufficiently  reliable/non-destructive for all users?

Are Epson substitutes so  wonderful that we can't rebuild our
darkrooms? Or is cheapness the driver?  

Consider: Have you seen many patriots for non-OEM color inks  ?



Yes, John, we're out here.... color inks as well as B/W.
We've invested in the Epson printers, we feel that we OWN our printers, and  
the restriction on how we USE our printers, is at issue here.
For my part, I wrote the letter to Mr. Bush. At the same time, I'm trying  to 
protect my interests just as Epson is protecting theirs. I refill Epson  
Cartridges for my 2 7600's, 2 4800's and 3 4000's. I will continue doing so, if  I 
have to collect even more empties to make sure I have a supply to  refill.
 
Richard Massie



************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: Epson situation, MIS developements, etc..

2007-11-11 by Tyler Boley

so now it's about my poor use of language.
There seems to be something I'm completely missing regarding a lot of this discussion.
So, you're saying I should do squat?
HUH?!
Help me out here, I'm not the brightest bulb in the room.

Tyler

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "djon43" <djon43@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> I suspect this is a "community" that makes B&W prints more than it is
> an "ink" community. 
> 
> This "community" will decide to agitate, or not. 
> 
> Is it passionate about Epson-targeted alternatives which do not seem
> sufficiently reliable/non-destructive for all users?
> 
> Are Epson substitutes so wonderful that we can't rebuild our
> darkrooms? Or is cheapness the driver? 
> 
> Consider: Have you seen many patriots for non-OEM color inks ?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Tyler Boley"
> <tyler@> wrote:
> >
> > with all due respect to everyone's posted opinions here and elsewhere,
> > it's been a bit frustrating to see on every list I've seen with
> > threads about this issue, everyone seem to want to discuss the
> > politics, the principals involved, the law, etc.. On a few lists I
> > think the ghost of Ayn Rand has been brought back.
> > All this is intriguing and conversational, however, completely off the
> > mark, at least in terms of what I see as most urgent.
> > 
> > This process is currently moving forward, because it's in Epson's
> > perceived best interests to make that happen, and they have the
> > resources to do apply.
> > 
> > For me, my art, my business, and B&W photographic standards in
> > general, it is not in my, or our, best interests that the process
> > completes in Epson's favor. Why is another long post.
> > I might add that it's apparently against the best interests of others
> > here we all consider the pillars of the B&W ink community.
> > 
> > Therefore, as long as there remains any chance to impact the outcome,
> > according to those here with some knowledge about the process, and
> > they tell us there are things we can do...
> > 
> > DO IT!!!
> > 
> > We can all discuss the principals and law involved around the campfire
> > some other day.
> > 
> > This concludes today's rant from the Decider
> >
>

Re: Epson situation, MIS developements, etc..

2007-11-11 by Tyler Boley

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "djon43" <djon43@...> wrote:
...
> Consider: Have you seen many patriots for non-OEM color inks ?

color inks I have put in Epsons since the EX came out-

MIS pigments
LysonicE
Indelible
Cone
Generations
Fotonic

Eventually Epson stopped gazing at their own buggers and lost sales and reputation and 
worked out the Ultrachromes. 
... and of course, the chips.
Tyler

RE: [Digital BW] Epson situation, MIS developements, etc..

2007-11-11 by Tom Baker

Paul  -
   
  Is there anything to be gained by pointing out to the decission makers that Epson does not provide the product that is needed by the b&w printing community (for the most part)?
   
  Tom Baker
  

Paul Roark <paul.roark@...> wrote:
          
>There may be another complication ... the US Government has 
>put a great deal of pressure on other countries --China and 
>India among many others -- to control unauthorized 
> reproduction of American products ...

Yes, and Dr. Susan Schwab, head of the U.S. Trade office and whose court
this ball is now in, is perhaps best known for her book on the trade offs
that take place in similar situations, and has also taught courses in U.S.
trade policy, including U.S./China trade relationships, and published
articles on U.S./Japanese trade relationships. She's no lightweight or
novice in these things. Exactly how it all ends up may involve issues we
aren't even aware of. 

However, what we can do is to make sure that the powers that be understand
the facts from our perspective, which may never have been conveyed to them
because we were not parties to these actions. One of the cases out of my
FTC office was all but won until the other side pulled off a letter-writing
campaign and produced 100 letters opposing the matter -- compared to the one
that was written in favor of it. The letters carried the day, despite all
the resources that had been poured into sophisticated fact finding, economic
consultants, etc. 

> I wonder if licensing might be the best bet.

It might be.

More generally, if this type of proceeding is similar to what I used to do,
how the order is written could be critical. For example, an order could
condition enforcement on reasonable licensing. How one decided what was
reasonable could be partially defined in the order to define where this type
of marketing might be warranted and where it is probably not. How the
orders are written is a huge part of the whole ball game and where interests
can be balanced such that most parties and consumer get most of what they
need. Again, though, if we don't make enough noise to be noticed, they
might not even know there are small companies here that are doing a whole
lot more than just making cheap knock-off copies.
.....

>How is it possible that in the UK that car manufactures have 
>an absolute monopoly for two or three years for spare parts 
>of a newly introduced car model, when all of the parts are 
>not made in the UK?

At the FTC we had a series of "crash parts" cases that dealt with that issue
also. I forget what the settlements involved. However, I know part of the
politics of it involved the insurance companies that didn't want to pay the
high prices. So I think we had the insurance companies v. the car
companies. It was one of those situations where one might want to hand both
parties large guns and ... well never mind.

Paul
www.PaulRoark.com 



                         


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

RE: [Digital BW] Epson situation, MIS developements, etc..

2007-11-11 by Paul Roark

>Is there anything to be gained by pointing out to the decision 
>makers that Epson does not provide the product that is needed 
>by the b&w printing community (for the most part)?

I do think it's relevant that the B&W community has products that are
innovative and different, not just cheap knock-offs of Epson's products.
Epson will, of course, say they now have B&W inks -- the k3 sets.

Probably a high number of letters, as opposed to their content, is more
likely to catch the attention of the agency.  However, the letters should
not all be the same.  They must be somewhat individualized.

Paul
www.PaulRoark.com

Re: [Digital BW] Re:MIS Newsletter

2007-11-11 by Ernst Dinkla

Native Texan Photographer wrote:

> 
> Well said, Mark.  I have wondered for the last two years, why a CIS 
> unit couldn't be designed and implemented that had a direct hook-up 
> to the ink input lines.  The clear top-fill carts for the 3000 is 
> nothing more than a square tank with a coupler that matches up with 
> the input nozzle on the printer.  Simple.
> 
> Uncle Dannie
> 

My Epson 9000 CIS systems had that seven years ago. Bottles 
directly connected to the internal ss ink lines inside. 
Still in use at some places. Only possible on wide format 
models where the carts are not on the head carriage. But for 
existing Epson wide format models I do not see a problem in 
general as ink will be available and there are enough chip 
resetters around up to the 9800 model. Refilling and 
resetting is easy enough. No need clone carts or a special CIS.


-- 
Met vriendelijke groeten, Ernst


|  Dinkla Grafische Techniek  |
|     www.pigment-print.com    |
|             ( unvollendet )            |

Re: [Digital BW] Re:MIS Newsletter

2007-11-11 by Tony Wells

Things like tyres are universal, but there is still an amazing amount of 
other fixtures and fittings that the makers (assemblers?) have made for them 
to their own specifications - Lucas electronics springs to mind - and so are 
only available from them until their "copyright" if you like expires and the 
real manufacturers canthen either sell direct or to other third parties. To 
echo your sentiments however, we have had the situation where "similar" 
parts are available from overseas though, which from what I have read of 
this thread is the way that most American Epson users will go, by way of 
private imports.

Tony.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Gary Brown" <baffin@...>
To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2007 11:50 PM
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re:MIS Newsletter


How is it possible that in the UK that car manufactures have an absolute 
monopoly for two or three years for spare parts of a newly introduced car 
model, when all of the parts are not made in the UK?


---- Original Message ----- 
  From: Tony Wells
  To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
  Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2007 11:57 AM
  Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re:MIS Newsletter


  Just to pick up on one point here Mr Roark, though not contentiously. Here
  in the UK the car manufacturers have either a 2 or 3 year absolute 
monolpoly
  of spare parts for any new car model they introduce, before the third 
party
  suppliers can kick in. This is mostly servicing parts such as oil filters
  and also silencers (mufflers?) from what I can gather, by the way. They 
key
  thing being irrrespective of any monoploy issues that any of the group
  members may have over this, surely a similar situation could apply to
  printer cartridges, whereby such as Epson could be the sole supplier for a
  set period of time when they introduce a new model before the market is up
  for grabs, so as to be able to recoup their development costs? Or don't
  printers last that long? Just an idea to throw into the pot ....

  Tony Wells.

 SNIP

Re: [Digital BW] Epson situation, MIS developements, etc..

2007-11-11 by Stephen Kobrin

Tyler,

Being pessimistic does not mean giving up.  I agree with you.

Steve

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Tyler Boley"
<tyler@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "stephengledhill"
> <stephengledhill@> wrote:
> ...
> > It seems that as it's presently a US issue there's probably not much
> I can
> > contribute on an internal US matter from overseas.
> 
> Hi Steve, I'm sure you are right, let's hope your willingness inspires
> some more colonists.
> 
> Other Steve, I'm certainly not optimistic either, far from it. Just
> can't seem to stomach the idea of standing back and watching it happen
> after all these years of working towards this beautiful process.
> Until someone with their finger on the pulse of this case says it's a
> done deal, I don't see the harm in spending a few minutes on a letter
> or two.
> Tyler
>

Re: [Digital BW] Epson situation, MIS developements, etc..

2007-11-11 by jwhorfin88

Paul,
After writing to the President and our Congressmen should we also be sending letters to Dr. 
Susan Schwab?
John Parascak
http://web.mac.com/johnparascak

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark" <paul.roark@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> Yes, and Dr. Susan Schwab, head of the U.S. Trade office and whose court
> this ball is now in, is perhaps best known for her book on the trade offs
> that take place in similar situations

Re: [Digital BW] Epson situation, MIS developements, etc..

2007-11-12 by RobLee

Did somebody already mention that we could write to ITC and give them hell for what they decided? We could also tell the government that we want health care and more affordable higher education. However, most Americans don't know how to spell or don't give a s... about others.

Carl Schofield <list@schophoto.com> wrote:                               Some interesting comments by an attorney in this DPR thread (5th post down) concerning the 
 composition of the ITC.
 
 http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat.asp?forum=1003&message=25577690
 
 
     
                               


 Rob 
  
  
 Incoming and outgoing mail scanned by AVG 
 www.grisoft.com
  


 __________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] Epson situation -- large format

2007-11-13 by Mitch Greenwald

Those who use large format printers, and are thus not affected by the 
recent decision, should not become complacent.  Here's a quote from the 
Epson FAQ:

        *Epson has, however, recently filed U.S. District Court patent 
infringement lawsuits regarding large format cartridges.
*

http://itc.epson.com/pdf/ITC-FAQ.pdf




>

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.