With all the software hacking and computer viruses in this world, does anyone think that a "firmware solution" will be created by a smart programer to trick the Epsons into thinking their carts are in the printer and thus allow the third party ink/cart makers to make some cart/chip that does not infringe on Epson? Fight fire with fire? It would certainly take years for Epson to get around that. Perhaps a CIS that connects directly into the ink lines, no carts at all. Mark On Nov 10, 2007, at 11:26 AM, Paul Roark wrote: > (Some rambling thoughts ...) > > Steve Kale wrote, in part: > >>> What¹s wrong with a company (anyone) wanting to protect and >>> generate a return from its intellectual capital? > > That's indirectly one of the legal issues: How far does the protection > (legal monopoly) extend? Several courts have stated that the > monopoly does > not extend into adjacent markets, including after market > replacement parts, > which seems similar to aftermarket ink sales. > >>> Nothing wrong with shopping around for a free lunch but >>> you should be happy you had a free lunch this far. > > I don't want to see Epson damaged by this any more than I want to > see the > aftermarket ink and cartridge sellers damaged. I think the > challenge here > is to come up with a win-win strategy. I agree we should not expect > to free > ride on anyone, and at the low end we probably have been. > > Being realistic, what may happen is that Epson's actions will cut > off the > mass market of cheap, pre-filled carts, while more sophisticated and > determined people -- including probably the real photo enthusiasts as > opposed to average snap shooters -- will find ways to circumvent the > problem, such as buying the empty carts on eBay or from an oversees > seller > and re-filling. Re-filling carts seems like a problem Epson will > have to > fight by making the carts very re-fill un-friendly. Blocking all the > easy-refill carts from overseas will probably be too expensive to > bother > with. > > > Tony Wells wrote, in part: > >> ... Low useage amateurs would be worse off while professional >> printers would be better off, > > In the original IBM case where their tying of punch card sales to the > business machines was declared an illegal "tying" agreement, the > economic > justification for the IBM conduct was said to be that the punch > cards were a > method of "metering" usage. The way the high volume users paid > more than > the low volume users, which seemed like a fair way to more closely > equate > price with the value of the machine to the user. > > If the scenario of the more sophisticated people more easily > getting around > the ban happens, it may end up that the higher volume users in the > real > world figure out how to avoid the meter, while the less > sophisticated pay > the premium. > > I have assumed Epson, in fact, is not selling the more sophisticated > machines at a loss. The Epson rep who visited me the week before > they filed > the ITC matter seemed mostly concerned with the low end. The 220 > was the > printer we discussed the most in this regard. He stated Epson lost > money on > those sales, and to compound the damage, the 220 was so good it was > seen as > cannibalizing the sales of the profitable, more expensive printers. > > While B&W ink sales are hardly the main focus of Epson's concern, > I'd be > rather happy to see a solution that allowed Epson to compete head > to head > with the others that are doing this same thing at the 260 level > (letter or > A4 size) if the 13" or 1800-2400 and up level was wide open. > > Epson has made some fine printers for our purposes. I hope they > continue to > do so. It would sure be nice if both sides saw each other as > partners as > opposed to adversaries. > > As a Hasselblad rep once said to me: photographers tend to be > creative and > cheap. I can't see Epson succeeding in keeping at least the B&W > enthusiasts > in their proprietary, expensive box. It's just not going to happen. > > Paul > www.PaulRoark.com > > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other > resources as they are often being updated. > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you > wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by > visiting this same page. > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages > to keep them short. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or > flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed > from the membership without notice. > - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital > B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be > removed from the membership. > - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules > and guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the > group Owner and Moderators. See “Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines” > in the Files section: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > > BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE > PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE > “OWNER” AND “MODERATORS” OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL > NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, > CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, > DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER > INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE “OWNER” AND “MODERATORS” OF DIGITAL > BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF > SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE > THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO > OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR > CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO > GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE > PRINT YAHOO GROUP. > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re:MIS Newsletter
2007-11-10 by Mark Savoia
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.