Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Re:MIS Newsletter

2007-11-10 by Mark Savoia

With all the software hacking and computer viruses in this world,  
does anyone think that a "firmware solution" will be created by a  
smart programer to trick the Epsons into thinking their carts are in  
the printer and thus allow the third party ink/cart makers to make  
some cart/chip that does not infringe on Epson? Fight fire with fire?  
It would certainly take years for Epson to get around that. Perhaps a  
CIS that connects directly into the ink lines, no carts at all.

Mark

On Nov 10, 2007, at 11:26 AM, Paul Roark wrote:

> (Some rambling thoughts ...)
>
> Steve Kale wrote, in part:
>
>>> What¹s wrong with a company (anyone) wanting to protect and
>>> generate a return from its intellectual capital?
>
> That's indirectly one of the legal issues: How far does the protection
> (legal monopoly) extend?  Several courts have stated that the  
> monopoly does
> not extend into adjacent markets, including after market  
> replacement parts,
> which seems similar to aftermarket ink sales.
>
>>> Nothing wrong with shopping around for a free lunch but
>>> you should be happy you had a free lunch this far.
>
> I don't want to see Epson damaged by this any more than I want to  
> see the
> aftermarket ink and cartridge sellers damaged.  I think the  
> challenge here
> is to come up with a win-win strategy. I agree we should not expect  
> to free
> ride on anyone, and at the low end we probably have been.
>
> Being realistic, what may happen is that Epson's actions will cut  
> off the
> mass market of cheap, pre-filled carts, while more sophisticated and
> determined people -- including probably the real photo enthusiasts as
> opposed to average snap shooters -- will find ways to circumvent the
> problem, such as buying the empty carts on eBay or from an oversees  
> seller
> and re-filling.  Re-filling carts seems like a problem Epson will  
> have to
> fight by making the carts very re-fill un-friendly.  Blocking all the
> easy-refill carts from overseas will probably be too expensive to  
> bother
> with.
>
>
> Tony Wells wrote, in part:
>
>> ... Low useage amateurs would be worse off while professional
>> printers would be better off,
>
> In the original IBM case where their tying of punch card sales to the
> business machines was declared an illegal "tying" agreement, the  
> economic
> justification for the IBM conduct was said to be that the punch  
> cards were a
> method of "metering" usage.  The way the high volume users paid  
> more than
> the low volume users, which seemed like a fair way to more closely  
> equate
> price with the value of the machine to the user.
>
> If the scenario of the more sophisticated people more easily  
> getting around
> the ban happens, it may end up that the higher volume users in the  
> real
> world figure out how to avoid the meter, while the less  
> sophisticated pay
> the premium.
>
> I have assumed Epson, in fact, is not selling the more sophisticated
> machines at a loss.  The Epson rep who visited me the week before  
> they filed
> the ITC matter seemed mostly concerned with the low end.  The 220  
> was the
> printer we discussed the most in this regard.  He stated Epson lost  
> money on
> those sales, and to compound the damage, the 220 was so good it was  
> seen as
> cannibalizing the sales of the profitable, more expensive printers.
>
> While B&W ink sales are hardly the main focus of Epson's concern,  
> I'd be
> rather happy to see a solution that allowed Epson to compete head  
> to head
> with the others that are doing this same thing at the 260 level  
> (letter or
> A4 size) if the 13" or 1800-2400 and up level was wide open.
>
> Epson has made some fine printers for our purposes.  I hope they  
> continue to
> do so.  It would sure be nice if both sides saw each other as  
> partners as
> opposed to adversaries.
>
> As a Hasselblad rep once said to me: photographers tend to be  
> creative and
> cheap.  I can't see Epson succeeding in keeping at least the B&W  
> enthusiasts
> in their proprietary, expensive box.  It's just not going to happen.
>
> Paul
> www.PaulRoark.com
>
>
>
>
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other  
> resources as they are often being updated.
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
>
> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you  
> wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by  
> visiting this same page.
>
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages  
> to keep them short.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or  
> flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed  
> from the membership without notice.
> - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital  
> B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be  
> removed from the membership.
> - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules  
> and guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the  
> group Owner and Moderators. See “Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines”  
> in the Files section:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/
>
> BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE  
> PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE  
> “OWNER” AND “MODERATORS” OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL  
> NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL,  
> CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO,  
> DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER  
> INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE  “OWNER” AND “MODERATORS” OF DIGITAL  
> BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF  
> SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE  
> THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO  
> OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR  
> CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO  
> GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE  
> PRINT YAHOO GROUP.
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.