Digital BW, The Print

A: Business: If Epson can make money with what they are doing, they will do
it, if they cannot, they will not. It is up to the customer base to insure
that Epson loses money and it is up to aggressive business practices by
other companies, (read Canon, HP here) to fill the void. Profit is
everything.

B. Law: That battle can be fought but who has pockets deep enough?

By the way who is "they"? The judges, the lawyers, the politicians? Now
there is a trustworthy group. There is nothing in this issue but business
and law. Epson already has their interpretation, the consumers have theirs,
third party manufacturers are certainly espousing an important viewpoint
from their perspective. In short, it all depends on whose ox is getting
gored. Make no mistake, however, this is all about business and law.

 

  _____  

From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Tyler
Boley
Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2007 3:33 PM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Epson situation, MIS developements, etc..

 

No, it's how they decide to interpret and apply the law, and that is
as yet not finalized in this case.
Read the posts by Jon and Paul.

--- In DigitalBlackandWhit
<mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com>
eThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Dana H. Myers"
<dana.myers@...> wrote:
>
> Tyler Boley wrote:
> 
> > Therefore, as long as there remains any chance to impact the outcome,
> > according to those here with some knowledge about the process, and
> > they tell us there are things we can do...
> > 
> > DO IT!!!
> > 
> > We can all discuss the principals and law involved around the campfire
> > some other day.
> 
> Forgive, but this makes absolutely no sense whatsoever :-)
> 
> Impacting the outcome is a matter of business and law; what
> makes you think otherwise?
> 
> Dana
>

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]