john kelly wrote: > Richard, bamboo is inevitable for most paper. > > The world's biggest paper plant is in Southeast Asia: > the company that bought the "Swiss" Ilford plant. The > entire purpose, beyond cheap labor, is to use bamboo: > ultra-renewable, a weed. > > Bamboo's environmental questions will have to do with > bleaches (less than for wood or recycled cotton?), as > well as shipment from SEA. > > As many already know, bamboo laminate is replacing > hardwoods for flooring and much hardwood furniture. > It's tougher than maple or the Asian/African native > woods and is inherently beautiful. Environmental > questions include glue and the energy used by > factories. > > Cotton is maximum-destructive, both in terms of soil > depletion and in terms of wasted croplands (should be > food...or perhaps hemp)...we like to think of cotton > as earth-conscious but that's wildly off base. There's more environmental control now in the old paper industries of Scandinavia, Canada, Europe and the USA including tree replant schemes + innovative bleach processes than there is in developing countries, whether the last use trees or any other fiber source. The green image often isn't a clear image. Companies will adapt to the laws and the enforcement of the laws if there are no cheaper, less restricted alternatives abroad. It will be hard to judge the environmental aspects of fibers on their organic source only. Pulp is shipped all over the world with different quality labels easy to control in the paper maker's intake labs. The environmental aspect is one that may not get the attention it needs right now with the increasing demand for commodities. That China expands its interests in African sources is a political and economic issue in the first place but Africa's usual state control and China's usual exploration of the earth looks like a bad combination. One may hope that it is better in South America and S.E. Asia. It is of course easy to preach from a continent that had its share of the world's wealth for a longer time and isn't preserving its own environment for much longer than 5 decades now. -- Met vriendelijke groeten, Ernst | Dinkla Grafische Techniek | | www.pigment-print.com | | ( unvollendet ) |
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Printing with less environmental footprint ...?
2007-11-13 by Ernst Dinkla
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.