Digital BW, The Print

No. It would not be better.

Shouldn't it be the choice of the individual to make that
determination? It's very easy to do. Why pay some less than discerning
level of bureaucracy to arbitrate what you may or may not try.
Using the third party materials most in use by folks on this group
doesn't particularly cause all those nasty things you speak of. Truth
is that most unfortunate results come from one's trying to take giant
steps while still in baby shoes.Those who would venture need to spend
some time and energy in learning how to avoid such things and what to
do to resolve them if a mistake is made.If one doesn't wish,or can't
afford, to spend that time and energy they aren't compelled to venture
at all.They can just stick with the OEM solutions and, hopefully,
await innovation. What they may Not do is force everyone else to
follow suit merely because of their own prejudicial experience.

Regards
Duane


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, john kelly
<djon43@...> wrote:

> 
> Wouldn't it be better to ask consumer watchdog
> agencies to punish companies that distribute
> printer-damaging, clogging inks, and cartridges that
> commonly fail, and CIS systems that damage print
> heads, than to to penalize companies that make good
> products?
>