Hello all, It's been quite some time since I posted, but after learning about the current situation with the ITC ruling, I had an idea I thought I might posit to the forum. This may be a naive idea but here goes. Since the patents in question pertain to the structure of the cartridges, what if one were to remove them altogether from the equation? From what I understand, the purpose of the cartridges is to provide a supply of ink that does not readily flow unless there is enough suction to draw air into the cart to replace the used ink. And as a means of holding the cartridge's chip in place so as to make contact with the printhead so it is recognized by the printer. So, what if a CIS were designed to be attached to the printhead directly via tubes/clamps of some sort and the dampening effect, to control the flow of ink, were reproduced by some structure external to the printer? And as for the chip, surely some adjustable structure could be utilized to bring the chips (not patented) in contact with the printhead. Aside from the obvious benefit of completely avoiding Epson's patents this system would also have the benefit of being universal to all printers with the same number of ink channels. Anyway, it's just an idea but maybe some of the more technical types out there could take this and run with it. Regards, Eric Ashworth
Message
Hypothetical Cart-Less CIS?
2007-11-15 by brigsby707
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.