If you use papers that exhibit objectionable bronzing or gloss differential then you could use glop. I see a little bronzing with the luster papers, but enough to make me want to bother with adding glop. Carl On Nov 15, 2007, at 6:43 AM, kpbgsu wrote: > Do you need to use GLOP for the 3-PKN method? > > Kevin Pang > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Carl Schofield > <list@...> wrote: >> >> Not any more John. Best small format B&W prints I've ever made on > RC >> (and the new fiber papers) have been with the Epson R1800 using > Paul >> Roark's 3-MK workflow, but subsituting the new MIS neutral PK > (part# >> RCNTL-4-PKN). These "3-PKN" prints have that luminous BO quality, >> but without the "grain". Very smooth highlights and midtones. > QTR >> R1800 3-PKN profiles for use with luster papers (Red River > UltraPro >> Satin 2.0 and IJA Microceramic Luster) available here: >> http://homepage.mac.com/scho/.Public/R1800_3PKN.zip >> >> Carl Schofield >> >> On Nov 14, 2007, at 9:13 AM, john kelly wrote: >> >>> Black Only is limited by print size. The smaller, the >>> worser. I suspect the main reasons for Black Only are >>> minimal learning curve and bogus film grain (good for >>> digicams). ...snip >>
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re:Damned good glossy prints
2007-11-15 by Carl Schofield
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.