Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Re:Damned good glossy prints

2007-11-15 by Carl Schofield

If you use papers that exhibit objectionable bronzing or gloss  
differential then you could use glop.  I see a little bronzing with  
the luster papers, but enough to make me want to bother with adding  
glop.

Carl

On Nov 15, 2007, at 6:43 AM, kpbgsu wrote:

> Do you need to use GLOP for the 3-PKN method?
>
> Kevin Pang
>
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Carl Schofield
> <list@...> wrote:
>>
>> Not any more John.  Best small format B&W prints I've ever made on
> RC
>> (and the new fiber papers) have been with the Epson R1800 using
> Paul
>> Roark's 3-MK workflow, but subsituting the new MIS neutral PK
> (part#
>> RCNTL-4-PKN).  These "3-PKN" prints have that luminous BO quality,
>> but without the "grain".   Very smooth highlights and midtones.
> QTR
>> R1800 3-PKN profiles for use with luster papers (Red River
> UltraPro
>> Satin 2.0 and IJA Microceramic Luster) available here:
>> http://homepage.mac.com/scho/.Public/R1800_3PKN.zip
>>
>> Carl Schofield
>>
>> On Nov 14, 2007, at 9:13 AM, john kelly wrote:
>>
>>> Black Only is limited by print size. The smaller, the
>>> worser. I suspect the main reasons for Black Only are
>>> minimal learning curve and bogus film grain (good for
>>> digicams). ...snip
>>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.