I agree. I just tried the Harmon and the dynamic range is excellent as is the dmax and sharpness, but the surface is certainly more slick than any fiber paper I ever used. To me it looks more like rc than I would like. The gamut and dmax richer on the Innova F Semi-Matte than the old Epson semi-matte. I love it, but it ain't cheap. We're gonna get addicted to this stuff and we gotta get the prices down a little. john --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Tyler Boley" <tyler@...> wrote: > > I think the Innova would be close, but I don't have any prints made on > the Epson to compare. > Jim Doyle has a good sample pack of all of these papers, it's worth > seeing. > Tyler > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Bill Iverson" > <wiverson@> wrote: > > > > Tyler (or anyone else): How does the Innova F Semi Matte surface > > compare with the discontinued Epson Semi-Matte? I very much liked the > > Epson's smooth-but-not-really-glossy surface (and the consequent > > reasonably rich blacks). But now it's gone, and I'd love to find a > > real fibre paper with the same type of surface. The Harman FB AI Gloss > > is nice, but a bit too glossy to be ideal, IMHO. > > > > Other nominations also welcomed, natch. > > > > Bill Iverson > > >
Message
Innova Semi Matte vs. Epson Semi-Matte was Re: Damned good glossy prints
2007-11-20 by john dean
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.