Eric, I believe from 1.1 on Cataloging is an option. I use it all the time on various portable drives. Paul On 11/20/07 2:04 PM, "E Neilsen" <e.neilsen2@...> wrote: > > > > > While there are many nice things about LR, there are also some MAJOR > disappointments. It may have become more stable with 1.3, but 1.2 was an > unstable beast. It has limitations, and not to be over looked one, for > cataloging an archive. If you have many large files that you¹d like to keep > track of it may leave you wanting. As a processing tool it is very nice. As > a data management/digital asset management tool I believe it has a long way > to go. I continue to use it, though not much for B&W conversion as I use > Real Grain to do much of that. > > Eric Neilsen Photo > > 4101 Commerce Street, Suite 9 > > Dallas, TX 75226 > > 214 827-8301 > > http://ericneilsenphotography.com > > SKype ejprinter > > _____ > > From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> > [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf Of James > Haney > Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 11:38 AM > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> > Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Adobe Lightroom? > > My opinion of Lightroom: > > I have totally changed my workflow with Lightroom at the center. > > Importing: > I use it to import my images from my DF cards. > In one step: > Copy as DNG to a main folder defined for the current year > Lightroom automatically creates a folder here named however you > want, but I have it make a folder named YYYY-MM-DD > (Lightroom automatically determines the correct entries for these > date values.) > Renames in coming files using capture date and unique ID > (you can define this a million different ways to suit your > purposes as user-defined presets) > Make a backup copy to a server directory (or another drive etc.) > Apply a basic set of values as a good baseline > I include copyright, date, my name, address, phone, web address, etc. > Batch apply and embed meta-data and keywords > I quick-tag using the subject of the shoot or anything that > applies to the whole shoot > At this point they are represented in the Lightroom database as a > Folder > > Reviewing: > I move through the shoot either promoting or demoting individual > images. (Flags) > (Keyboard command to batch-delete demoted images) > Multiple, powerful compare modes help select the best images > > Rough edit, visualization > At this point, I use one of the most powerful tools of the system, I > create VIrtual Copies of the images I want to convert to black and > white. > A virtual copy is a set of meta-data that points to the original > image source data, but filters it through a separate set of values. > This Virtual Copy I open in the Develop module where I convert it > to Black and White, apply sharpening, cropping, rotation, and a > million other options. - This Virtual copy is not a duplicate of the > source image, it is just a set of XML data that specifies how to > process the file. each virtual copy takes up about 32k of space and > there is no limit to how many you have. > > I put the Virtual Copies for the project into a Lightroom Collection. > This is just a shopping basket of sorts that allows you to group a > set of images (or Virtual Copies) into a manageable and meaningful set. > > Batch export for review > Export rough edited images as jpegs (or any other format) if I need > to show them to clients or to post on the web. Lightroom has some > absolutely amazing Web export modules. > > Production > I use the tools in the Lightroom Develop module to do all of my > global color and tone control. > High light and shadow point setting (Levels) > Basic tone curves > B&W conversion > Capture sharpening > This is done with a very critical eye. The tools in this module are > basically identical to those in Adobe Camera Raw, but I think work > better and are far more easily accomplished in the context of the > Lightroom interface. > > Export to Photoshop > Every tool has its purpose and its limits. > Even though you can do cloning in Lightroom, it is only useful for > very basic edits. > I do all local, regional or pixel based editing in Photoshop. > > I control-click on the image in LR and choose "Edit with Photoshop" > This presents me with a dialog box where I choose "Edit a Copy with > Lightroom adjustments", "16 bit TIFF" and "Stack with Original" > You end up with a TIFF image in the same folder as the source > image. You can specify how you want LR to name files that it creates. > I append "_v01" to the end of the name. > The file opens as an RGB TIFF file in PS. (If your image was > converted to pure black and white in LR then Red, Green, and Blue > values are all identical. conversion to Greyscale will not change the > tone of the images) Discussion of LR split toning is another discussion) > All of your LR adjustments have been applied to this image, so it > will look just like it did in LR. > I created a Photoshop action that: > Converts to Greyscale > Creates some basic curve layers that I always use with the names I > want them to have > Now I am off to the races! > > In PS I have way more control of the image, I can softproof (not > available in LR), etc. > > When you save the file and go back to LR you will find a new image in > the folder, and collection you were in before. This is the TIFF file > you created. > > You can re-open it from LR with "Edit with Photoshop" and choose > instead "Edit Original." This will launch the TIFF version. > > Interestingly, you can make additional edits using Lightroom Develop > tools on the B&W TIF file. This gets a little strange and complicated > to understand but basically, it just works! > > In previous version of Lightroom I could not get QuadTone RIP to > print properly. However, suddenly, with version 1.3, I use the QTR- > RGB profile and I can use the truly outstanding Print module of > Lightroom to print individual files, groups of images, crop on the > fly without changing the image in Photoshop, without even opening the > file in Photoshop. > > If I sound like a true believer, I am. > > I spend so much more of my time editing and producing images and far, > far less time managing files, creating scripts, investigating various > tools and re-inventing my process every 2 months to incorporate an > change in technology. > > In my portrait work, I used to spend 2 hours getting a batch of > images imported, renamed, in iView, tagged with meta-data, roughly > edited to make them presentable and exported to the software I use > for client presentation and editing. I used three Applescripts, a > shareware program and iView Media Pro. Now this is all done in about > 15 minutes, with one program. > > I have used all of the RGB-B&W conversion utilities out there and > there is nothing that is any better than the tools in LR in my > opinion. But that is just the tip of the iceberg. > > Besides purchasing Photoshop, Lightroom is the best money I have ever > spent on software. > > my 40¢ > > James Haney > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Adobe Lightroom?
2007-11-20 by Paul Grant
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.