Richard In my first post in this thread, I said "(I realise that a post like this may attract a number of warnings from people who have had bad experiences. I've read the warnings and on this occasion would like to hear from those, if any, with positive recommendations.)" I answer your question, though, because (i) if you do enough printing it's not just "a few bucks", and (ii) It's my protest against Epson's pricing, marketing and enforcement policies. I remain interesting in hearing *positive* recommendations about either (a) refillable cart sources (not CIS), and/or (b) 3rd party K3 (i.e. colour) replacement inks that people are happy with in the R2400. There are enough threads here debating OEM vs 3rd party. Please don't crowd out my request for positive recommendations by turning this into another one. F_P --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Richard Siegel <roustabout1066@...> wrote: > > Ok, I am new to this group, but for the life of me I can not understand that > if you want quality images from your better Epson printers, especially those > that take the K inks why anyone would want to save a few bucks buying > refillable inks if you expect quality images and no problems coming from > your Epson photo printers!! > > There is no way I would subject my r2400 or any other Epson printer for > that matter to 3rd party inks. > > Richard
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Refillable 2400 Carts
2007-12-02 by ferdinand_paris
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.