It takes awhile to learn the idiosyncrasies of scanning. Having worked in two consumer labs, they only do the most basic of training, and they buy the most automated equipment that they can. The idea is to make the positions as unskilled as possible, because then you'll have the biggest pool of people who can do the job, and we all know that the more people can do the job, the less the company has to pay them. Pro labs can charge more, and so they can indulge in more training, but only to the point where the work will support that training, and my guess is that there's relatively little call for digitalizing negatives. For awhile many commercial studios still shot film, and this provided the volume (and budgets) that supported first rate scanning. But since commercial studios are overwhelmingly using digital capture, this is no longer the case. At my studio, they want to scan some of their old film images for stock, and so they bought a Nikon Coolscan 5000. Even so, they have a stylist (who doesn't know anything about scanning) do the scanning. I helped her out a little, but they clearly aren't willing to pay me (a lowly assistant who does, however, have a fair bit of scanning experience) to spend the time to do a good job. Intermediate hobby/fine art photographers tend to get their own scanners, and so all that leaves is high-end hobby/art photographers/archivists who will generally be willing to pay for a good scan, although these people will probably require significantly less scans than the commercial people needed in the past, excepting perhaps the archivists. Given the cost of really good scanners, either drum scanners or high-end flatbeds, we should either be willing to buy the equipment ourselves, or we should support the fairly small group of excellent scanning outfits. These are difficult to find. There are a number of places that sell on cost, and it's doubtful that they do excellent work. In addition, there are a number of fine art photographers who have a high-end scanner for their own work, and they do scans to help pay from the equipment. That's not a bad idea, but these people would probably rather be out photographing or working on their own stuff rather then doing other people's scans, and they might look at the scanning as a hobby rather than a business. Personally, I haven't found someone who gives the quality, service and fair price that I"m looking for.
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: B&W Scanning Quality
2007-12-25 by Peter De Smidt
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.