--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark" <paul.roark@...> wrote: > > Denis, > > I don't mean to answer for Carl, but be sure not to use my original PKN that > is on the MIS "Roark's Lab" page > (http://www.inksupply.com/roarkslab.cfm)(not my doing). > > At that page MIS states: > "PKN - Ultratone Photo Black Neutral - > Paul has discovered that, by adding some archival blue pigments to the > Ultratone Photo Black ink, he can achieve a significantly higher Dmax > on gloss and semi-gloss papers." > > I agree. > Paul. In message 88451 you advised me "For a neutral PK print, take a look at the UT-RC inkset. The PKN is quite nice. It has some cyan and R800 Blue in it, but I held it down as much as I could and still have what I considered a good black black only print." Following this advice I bought 24 Oz of "UTPKN-4", installed them in a new continuous supply system and used loads of expensive new fiber papers in testing. Is this the wrong ink to have used? You also said "There are also dilute RC inks for the R260 etc. that would make a good inkset for the 1800, but I have not gone there." for this reason I did not buy them. Possibly this accounts for the poor results I had from QTR linearization but I now have photoshop curves to linearize these. Please supply the link to what I should buy when I have used up all this stuff. Perhaps I should just ditch it. Colin
Message
[Digital BW] Re:Damned good glossy prints
2007-12-26 by colingruk
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.