Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

RE: [Digital BW] 280 (was OK & Epson has revised their website)

2007-12-28 by Mike Johnston

Thanks Paul and Mitch.
Mike J.

-----Original Message-----
From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Paul Roark
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 9:21 AM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Digital BW] 280 (was OK & Epson has revised their website)

>I'll take a look at the QTR link, but in the meantime,
>how does one do BO printing these days when the newer
>machines and drivers don't allow for the option?

Epson wants B&W photographers to use its 2400 and other "k3" printers.

>How is the R280's reliability and ink clogging?

My 260 has been nearly perfect.  It's the one I use for daily printing.  I
generally use the 1800 or 7500 for my best B&W.  The 260 with Eboni does
good black only, but the 1800 with the 3-MK workflow is slightly smoother.

>The QTR requirements page:
> http://www.quadtonerip.com/html/QTRrequire.html
> Does not list the 260 or 280. Is it similar enough to the 1280?

See http://www.quadtonerip.com/html/QTRoverview.html  The 260 family is
supported.

Be sure MIS has the carts available for these.  I'm not sure what MIS's
status is with respect to carts. (They're closed for year-end inventory
now.)

Paul
www.PaulRoark.com

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.