Thanks Paul and Mitch. Mike J. -----Original Message----- From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Paul Roark Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 9:21 AM To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Digital BW] 280 (was OK & Epson has revised their website) >I'll take a look at the QTR link, but in the meantime, >how does one do BO printing these days when the newer >machines and drivers don't allow for the option? Epson wants B&W photographers to use its 2400 and other "k3" printers. >How is the R280's reliability and ink clogging? My 260 has been nearly perfect. It's the one I use for daily printing. I generally use the 1800 or 7500 for my best B&W. The 260 with Eboni does good black only, but the 1800 with the 3-MK workflow is slightly smoother. >The QTR requirements page: > http://www.quadtonerip.com/html/QTRrequire.html > Does not list the 260 or 280. Is it similar enough to the 1280? See http://www.quadtonerip.com/html/QTRoverview.html The 260 family is supported. Be sure MIS has the carts available for these. I'm not sure what MIS's status is with respect to carts. (They're closed for year-end inventory now.) Paul www.PaulRoark.com
Message
RE: [Digital BW] 280 (was OK & Epson has revised their website)
2007-12-28 by Mike Johnston
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.