--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "ferdinand_paris" <ferdinand_paris@...> wrote: > > Can I take it that this question (Cone vs MIS) is too sensitive to > warrant a public reply? I don't think the group shrinks from controversy. You probably just summarized the main points, so no need to add more. I currently have my 100% carbon, dilute Eboni inkset in my 2200. It's matte only, as smooth as any ever (7 monotone inks firing), home-mixable like darkroom chemicals (particularly if MIS does not get the base on it's web page soon), as stable as any, epson driver compatible, etc. See http://www.paulroark.com/BW-Info/Eboni-6.pdf <http://www.paulroark.com/BW-Info/Eboni-6.pdf> Of course, it may be a limited appeal approach. MIS was having trouble getting 2200 carts for a while with the Epson ITC matter. Hopefully that was a short term problem. Paul www.PaulRoark.com <http://www.PaulRoark.com> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: Another post on Cone vs UT7 for 2100/2200
2008-01-01 by pr_roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.