I agree with Tyler. I have set up several printers over time to print with different brands of B/W inksets, starting with Cone's PiezoTone cool tone inks in a 1280. I put warm tone in another 1280. Mediastreet GQ went into a 2200. After I sold the 2 1280's and Cone developed NK 7 inks, I loaded a 4000 with NK 7 and another 4000 with a split tone NK7 set. What I found was that it all depended on the image, as to which inkset I wanted to use. I have files of images on film from almost 60 years of photographing, 18 as a professional. I shot everything under the sun, from here at home, to Europe, the Caribbean and West Africa. Lighting conditions, subject matter and my interpretation all contributed to my decisions on inksets to print with, just as in the darkroom, I would switch paper, and/or developer to pull the print I wanted. There is no silver bullet, or easy answer to your question. You are the arbiter and it's your call on that one. If you don't want to do your own testing and experimenting, send a file to someone using a different inkset and ask them to print it. And after you find the inkset, there's the choice of paper....... Richard Massie In a message dated 1/1/2008 12:15:37 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, tyler@... writes: I just don't think there's a blanket answer to that. It depends on so many individual subjective things, particularly the nature of your imagery, and your personal preferences about B&W prints. The other reason there may be few replies, I don't suppose there are many that have extensive experience with both systems and feel qualified to answer. Tyler --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "ferdinand_paris" <ferdinand_paris@...> wrote: > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "pr_roark" > <pr_roark@> wrote: > > I don't think the group shrinks from controversy. You probably just > > summarized the main points, so no need to add more. > > I guess the bottom line question remains: are the pluses of Cone > worth the considerable extra cost? > > F_P > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as they are often being updated. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. Please follow these basic guidelines: - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the membership without notice. - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from the membership. - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and Moderators. See “Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines” in the Files section: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE “OWNER” AND “MODERATORS ” OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE “OWNER” AND “MODERATORS” OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP. Yahoo! Groups Links **************************************See AOL's top rated recipes (http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004) [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Another post on Cone vs UT7 for 2100/2200
2008-01-01 by CorrPro96@aol.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.