> [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On > Behalf Of David Whistance wrote: > > The only "downside" is that you > need to choose > which tone you want before you buy rather than before you > print. I've used > the Neutral and Split Tone inks so far with great results but am torn > between them as to which is my favourite. If you're comfortable creating your own profiles, it is possible to have toning options using one set of Cone inks. I use the following: K - Eboni; Sepia - 2/4/6; Neutral 3/5/7. I use MIS Eboni because of it's excellent Dmax. I can also use it for my colour prints. This configuration gives me the following options. . . K-S2-S4-S6 - Sepia K-N3-N5-N7 - Neutral K-S2-S4-S6-N7 - Sepia with netural highlights K-S2-S4-N5-N7 - Sepia shadows moving to Neutral highlights, transitioning in the midtones Various tones between Sepia and Neutral, using QTR's blending capabilities Various split-tone combinations of Sepia and Neutral (shadows, midtones & highlights) using QTR's split tone capabilities. For example, 70% Sepia shadows, 70% Sepia midtones, 100% Neutral highlights makes for very nice portrait and landscape prints. Sepia by itself looks softer than Neutral (even though the densities are the same). Blending some neutral into the shadows/midtones give the more punch yet still retains the warmth of sepia. Having neutral highlights make for nice skintones. When I use this combination for landscape images I can get a really nice 3D effect. I don't have problems with clogging, and I'm using a 2200. I'm very pleased with this configuration. It's flexible, yet high quality (4 dilutions minimum) and I don't have to worry about colour pigments (other than what is in Sepia). Buying the Cone inks in bulk really brings the cost down. All the best in sorting out your decision. Terry.
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Another post on Cone vs UT7 for 2100/2200
2008-01-02 by Terry Ritz
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.