I'd HIGHLY recommend that you reconsider your work flow to include RAW shooting. JPEG is just trimming too much good stuff. If your print size is limited to maybe 8x10 and smaller, you may not see much change. And if you really can not afford a bit more space for files, at least get yourself Qimage to resize for printing and web use from your one original file. I think you'll be much happier with your work. Eric Neilsen Photography 4101 Commerce Street Suite 9 Dallas, TX 75226 http://e.neilsen.home.att.net http://ericneilsenphotography.com Skype ejprinter _____ From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of glemasurier Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 11:17 PM To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Am I destroying image quality Thanks, Paul. I haven't tried RAW because of computing power and storage space, and the extra hassle of converting them to TIFFs or the PSD files that I usually use. Perhaps the better question then is to ask if converting to 16-bit for editing actually does me any good? On image size, do you mean setting the finished print size and letting resolution fall where it may? That's what I have been doing, and have had fairly good results up to 12 x 18 on a 2400. Cheers, George [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Am I destroying image quality
2008-01-05 by Eric Neilsen
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.