On Jan 5, 2008, at 10:10 AM, Frank Jay wrote: > Can you explain the above please Shoshanna. I was under the > impression that RAW files can't be printed as a RAW file, but must > be translated to another type of file. I admit I have tons of holes > in my digital and PS knowledge and I must have heard or read this > and believed it. Ques is.............. How does one enlarge > directly from a RAW file?....OR, am I confusing, enlarging with > printing. JPEG files can have what are referred to as artifacts. These may be from for example, in camera sharpening or data compression. Also remember that JPEG are 8 bit images which would be able to contain 256 (2^8) different tonalities. On the other hand, RAW can be processed at 16 bit which would be 65,536 (2^16) tonalities. If you have ever worked on an image in Photoshop and saw gaps in your histogram appear, that happens because adjustments in the image have been too extreme for the amount of data (tonalities) in the image. If those gaps become significant enough you may start to see posterization (unnatural tonalities) in the image. That situation happens much easier in 8 bit images with 256 than 65,536 tonalities. In my workflow, I process the RAW image in Adobe Camera RAW, open it directly into Photoshop, do my image manipulations, save the Photoshop file as a master file and when I want to print it, I save a flattened _copy_ of the master file for that purpose. As far as enlarging, that is controlled either by specifying an output size in your RAW processing software of choice or in Photoshop with the Image Size dialog. You have to specify the dimensions and how many pixels per inch (PPI) you want the resulting image to be. Jim
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Am I destroying image quality
2008-01-05 by Jim Goshorn
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.