Nice list guys - I hadnt been in here for a long time. Amazing some very subtle half truths as well as good stuff. Amazing. Best regards, Bill Bergh --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "bill_bergh" <bergh@c...> wrote: > And I hear that the piezo driver gives even better prints though I have n= ot= > seen it. > > I have been told behind the scenes that this guy works for MIS or gets fr= ee= > stuff. > > Looking back through the archives I would say it asfe to say that he is a= g= > overnment employee or a lawyer. What a twisted methodology. > > - FR > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Paul Roark" <paul.roark@v...> = wr= > ote: > > Jan, > > > > > I do have the latest Cone plug-in and the > > >banding does occur in the Epson driver, but not as noticeably I > > >assume because of the difference in dpi. > > > > It may be the same thing, but I think it is the dither pattern differen= ce= > . > > I think Epson is ahead on the issue of a dither that hides the defects = ye= > t > > preserves the sharpness. However, Piezo has the advantage of smaller d= ot= > s. > > > > >I'm relieved that no one thinks it is because of the loss of all the > > >pizza-cutter wheels. > > > > I've actually not taken mine off yet. I've noticed the marks on only o= ne= > > > print so far. I may yet remove them. > > > > >... what can be done about crummy transport? > > > > The archives of the Piezo group leave one with the impression that if y= ou= > > > get a bad machine there is little that can be done by the user. On the= > > other hand, a good machine may stay that way for years. > > > > Of course, the most objective test is to see whether a 20 inch long pri= nt= > is > > actually that length. If not, the stepper motor may need replacing. > > > > I concluded that front feeding paper that was within the machine's > > paper-thickness design tolerances was the safe thing to do. So, I use = EA= > M, > > and I front feed the paper to have the maximum contact between the pape= r = > and > > the roller. Many users, however, say thick paper is fine and back feed= in= > g > > is fine. There are clearly a lot of factors. > > > > I also cut my paper from a roll to be 24" long instead of 22". I notic= ed= > > > that the last couple of inches were prone to banding with 22" EAM (and = 20= > " > > image). The extra 2" gives the transport mechanism that much more pape= r = > to > > get a grip on. It works and is evidence that having as much contact wi= th= > > > the roller as possible is one of the factors. > > > > I also always pre-feed the paper with the button on the front of the 30= 00= > , > > so that when I go to print it will be properly fed. With the "Load/eje= ct= > " > > button and a mark I've put on the feed tray where the back end of the p= ap= > er > > is supposed to be, I can eject the paper and start over if it is not > > perfectly started. I even seem to be able to get rid of any skew by > > physically straightening the paper as it just starts to feed. And if i= ts= > > > not perfect -- eject and do it again. This saves a lot of frustration = an= > d > > wasted printing time. > > > > Good luck. The old 3000 is a bit of a clunker, but I love the results = I = > get > > with the Epson driver and the MIS VM inks. > > > > Paul > > http://www.PaulRoark.com
Message
Re: [Digital BW] 3000 banding
2002-02-04 by bill_bergh
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.