And I hear that the piezo driver gives even better prints though I have not= seen it. I have been told behind the scenes that this guy works for MIS or gets free= stuff. Looking back through the archives I would say it asfe to say that he is a g= overnment employee or a lawyer. What a twisted methodology. - FR --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Paul Roark" <paul.roark@v...> wr= ote: > Jan, > > > I do have the latest Cone plug-in and the > >banding does occur in the Epson driver, but not as noticeably I > >assume because of the difference in dpi. > > It may be the same thing, but I think it is the dither pattern difference= . > I think Epson is ahead on the issue of a dither that hides the defects ye= t > preserves the sharpness. However, Piezo has the advantage of smaller dot= s. > > >I'm relieved that no one thinks it is because of the loss of all the > >pizza-cutter wheels. > > I've actually not taken mine off yet. I've noticed the marks on only one= > print so far. I may yet remove them. > > >... what can be done about crummy transport? > > The archives of the Piezo group leave one with the impression that if you= > get a bad machine there is little that can be done by the user. On the > other hand, a good machine may stay that way for years. > > Of course, the most objective test is to see whether a 20 inch long print= is > actually that length. If not, the stepper motor may need replacing. > > I concluded that front feeding paper that was within the machine's > paper-thickness design tolerances was the safe thing to do. So, I use EA= M, > and I front feed the paper to have the maximum contact between the paper = and > the roller. Many users, however, say thick paper is fine and back feedin= g > is fine. There are clearly a lot of factors. > > I also cut my paper from a roll to be 24" long instead of 22". I noticed= > that the last couple of inches were prone to banding with 22" EAM (and 20= " > image). The extra 2" gives the transport mechanism that much more paper = to > get a grip on. It works and is evidence that having as much contact with= > the roller as possible is one of the factors. > > I also always pre-feed the paper with the button on the front of the 3000= , > so that when I go to print it will be properly fed. With the "Load/eject= " > button and a mark I've put on the feed tray where the back end of the pap= er > is supposed to be, I can eject the paper and start over if it is not > perfectly started. I even seem to be able to get rid of any skew by > physically straightening the paper as it just starts to feed. And if its= > not perfect -- eject and do it again. This saves a lot of frustration an= d > wasted printing time. > > Good luck. The old 3000 is a bit of a clunker, but I love the results I = get > with the Epson driver and the MIS VM inks. > > Paul > http://www.PaulRoark.com
Message
Re: [Digital BW] 3000 banding
2002-02-04 by bill_bergh
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.