Digital BW, The Print

Seems to me we made our own developer in Photography school once...or  
maybe we just added stuff to change it. Sounds like you are breaking  
uncharted ground here. I think I better keep it simple for now. I am  
interested in your pdf and your site though, I'll give it a read.

Mark


On Jan 8, 2008, at 7:05 PM, pr_roark wrote:

>
>
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Mark Gilvey
> <mark@...> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Paul,
> >
> > Please educate me on what I'm looking at ...
>
> http://www.paulroark.com/BW-Info/220-Eb6-PA-BW-Lab.jpg
> <http://www.paulroark.com/BW-Info/220-Eb6-PA-BW-Lab.jpg>
>
> My push for a 100% carbon pigment printing workflow for my 7500, as  
> well
> as a project to make a "workable" carbon inkset for a watercolorist,
> ended up with an inkset that is not workable with water and a brush
> (despite not having a binder in the dilution base), but much more
> neutral and versatile than I expected. I currently think this approach
> will work in all of the large dot Epsons (all but the 1.5 pl models  
> that
> don't need the dilute inks -- like the 1800 3-MK workflow).
>
> See http://www.paulroark.com/BW-Info/Eboni-6.pdf
> <http://www.paulroark.com/BW-Info/Eboni-6.pdf> for more information
> about the inkset.
>
> The original Eboni-6 is still in beta, but I'm publishing the
> information that I currently think is needed for a home brew B&W  
> digital
> darkroom to develop. This feels analogous to what many of us did with
> B&W film developers, etc. I think there is a small niche of B&W  
> workers
> who will enjoy the controls at this level, not to mention the results
> and economy.
>
> Paul
>
> www.PaulRoark.com <http://www.PaulRoark.com>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]