Digital BW, The Print

Eric, this Forum contains excellent hard data...it's right here if you
really want it. 

Yes, 3rd party inks work beautifully for some, terribly for others..as
you yourself have just admitted (blaming the operator).

Happily for you, you never have clog problems with your third party
inks, and happily for me I've only had to do a cleaning routine twice
in 5 years with my OEM 2200 (whereas its MIS-using twin died). 

When I replace my 2200 I'll skip 2400 (less reliable) and go to its
successor or to 3800, or to the next generation of Canon, and I'll use
OEM.... 

...because my time's worth a lot more than ink savings.

Someone else's mileage may vary YMMV


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Eric Neilsen"
<e.neilsen2@...> wrote:
>
> "probably has to do
> with erratic quality of all 3rd party inks"
> 
>  
> 
> Do you have any data to back that up?  I would suspect individual
working