I've also got VIsta64 and 8 gig. As you say, the scratch drive setup doesn't make much difference. But, I was responding to concerns on a more typical setup.
(and if Vista 64 doesn't get a little easier to live with, I may go back to 32)
Tom Baker
Bob Frost <bob@...> wrote:
Tom,
> To perform at it's best, there should be zero contention for drive that
> your scratch disk is assigned to.
Depends on your setup. I have a Raid0 (2x 150 Raptors) as my main system
drive, and two other drives of 750GB and 500GB for data. I have shown quite
conclusively that the best place for my PS scratch disk is in a separate
partition on my Raid0 disk. It is much quicker than putting it on a separate
partition of either of the two big data disks. The best place for the
Windows Pagefile is out on one of the two big disks (sep partition) as with
4/8GB Ram the pagefile is less important.
I'm currently trying Vista64 with 8GB ram, and that is even quicker still,
since the OS uses spare Ram as a virtual scratch disk before going to the
real disk.
The size of the scratch disk is not so important surely? When PS fills one
drive with scratch files, it simply moves on to the next ones that you have
designated in prefs.
Bob Frost.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Baker" <tbaker1328@...>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]Message
Re: [Digital BW] Scratch Disk
2008-01-30 by Tom Baker
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.