Bob, Noted your comment on using Vista 64. Curious as you motive for the 64 bit version. We you able to get all the drivers that you need? Paul From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Bob Frost Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 10:26 AM To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Scratch Disk Tom, > To perform at it's best, there should be zero contention for drive that > your scratch disk is assigned to. Depends on your setup. I have a Raid0 (2x 150 Raptors) as my main system drive, and two other drives of 750GB and 500GB for data. I have shown quite conclusively that the best place for my PS scratch disk is in a separate partition on my Raid0 disk. It is much quicker than putting it on a separate partition of either of the two big data disks. The best place for the Windows Pagefile is out on one of the two big disks (sep partition) as with 4/8GB Ram the pagefile is less important. I'm currently trying Vista64 with 8GB ram, and that is even quicker still, since the OS uses spare Ram as a virtual scratch disk before going to the real disk. The size of the scratch disk is not so important surely? When PS fills one drive with scratch files, it simply moves on to the next ones that you have designated in prefs. Bob Frost. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Baker" <tbaker1328@... <mailto:tbaker1328%40sbcglobal.net> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Scratch Disk
2008-01-30 by Paul Grant
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.