djon43 wrote: > Right/Wrong? : HP B9180 beats Epson 2400 in *EVERY respect* ASSUMING > OEM pigments (except panoramas and perhaps metamerism on gloss)...is > that a fair conclusion? > > Asked another way: using OEM pigments, are there *any* B&W arguments > in favor of 2400 or 1900, other than gloss and panoramas? I have none of them but some time ago they were compared to one another (+ a Canon) in a Photo-i review that also had a page on B&W: http://www.photo-i.co.uk/Reviews/printers/Pigs/page_1.html Also check what the reviewer would buy of all the printers on the market these days, at the end of the review. -- Met vriendelijke groeten, Ernst | Dinkla Grafische Techniek | | www.pigment-print.com | | ( unvollendet ) |
Message
Re: [Digital BW] HP B9180 = better than 2400 ?
2008-02-07 by Ernst Dinkla
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.