Digital BW, The Print

Thx again, Tyler. A big help.
G.


El 11/2/08 15:42, "Tyler Boley" <tyler@tylerboley.com> escribió:

>  
>  
>  
> 
> The Epson is this, on a thicker base. Exactly.
> Epson does not make paper.
> 
> Yes, lots of experience. If you search this list you'll find a great
> deal of info about it.
> T
> 
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> , Gabriel Valansi
> <gvalansi@...> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hey Tyler, Thanks!
>> > What about this Innova? Do you have any experiene with this paper?
>> > 
>> > 
>> > El 11/2/08 15:03, "Tyler Boley" <tyler@...> escribió:
>> > 
>>> > >  
>>> > >  
>>> > >  
>>> > > 
>>> > > http://www.shadesofpaper.com/product_info.php?cPath=30&products_id=154
>>> <http://www.shadesofpaper.com/product_info.php?cPath=30&products_id=154>
>>> > >
> <http://www.shadesofpaper.com/product_info.php?cPath=30&products_id=154
> <http://www.shadesofpaper.com/product_info.php?cPath=30&amp;products_id=15
> 4> <http://www.shadesofpaper.com/product_info.php?cPath=30&products_id=154
> >  >
>>> > > 
>>> > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
>>> <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com>
>>> > > <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> , Gabriel
> Valansi
>>> > > <gvalansi@> wrote:
>>>>> > >> >
>>>>> > >> > I need a print  paper with the same characteristics for the Epson
>>> > > EF, but in
>>>>> > >> > 44² roll. I made test with the Ilford and hahnemuhle baryta papers
>>> > > And I´m
>>>>> > >> > soooo disappointed. somebody knows if Epson plan to make the
> same EF
>>> > > paper
>>>>> > >> > in bigger sizes?, or any possible replacement?
>>>>> > >> > 
>>>>> > >> > Thanks
>>>>> > >> > 
>>>>> > >> > El 11/2/08 14:19, "scott_now_coming" <scott_now_coming@> escribió:
>>>>> > >> > 
>>>>>>> > >>> > >  
>>>>>>> > >>> > >  
>>>>>>> > >>> > >  
>>>>>>> > >>> > > 
>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >> > I keep looking for information on Epson Exhibition
> paper but keep
>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >> > finding this discussion about something else
entirely.
>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >> >
>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >> > Thanks.
>>>>>>> > >>> > > 
>>>>>>> > >>> > > Hi Scott,
>>>>>>> > >>> > > 
>>>>>>> > >>> > > I'm glad you found the article useful. I post that link
> because I
>>>>>>> > >>> > > thought people would be interested in this new paper and
> what a few
>>>>>>> > >>> > > people who have used it (and tested it) had to say.
>>>>>>> > >>> > > 
>>>>>>> > >>> > > Boy was I wrong! 99.9999% non-sense. I'd think peple would
just
>>> > > move on
>>>>>>> > >>> > > if the article didn't interest them. Instead, they spend
> their energy
>>>>>>> > >>> > > flaming and complaining. Must to nice to have that much time
> on your
>>>>>>> > >>> > > hands.
>>>>>>> > >>> > > 
>>>>>>> > >>> > > Glad you found that article useful. :>)
>>>>>>> > >>> > > 
>>>>>>> > >>> > > Another Scott :>)
>>>>>>> > >>> > > 
>>>>>>> > >>> > >  
>>>>>>> > >>> > >  
>>>>> > >> > 
>>>>> > >> > 
>>>>> > >> > 
>>>>> > >> > 
>>>>> > >> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>>>> > >> >
>>> > > 
>>> > >  
>>> > >     
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>> >
> 
>  
>     




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]