Epson Exhibition Fiber - A Review
2008-02-09 by scott_now_coming
Yahoo Groups archive
Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC
Thread
2008-02-09 by scott_now_coming
Enjoy! http://www.luminous- landscape.com/reviews/printers/Epson_Exhibition_Fiber.shtml? main_page=product_info&cPath=20&products_id=173
2008-02-09 by Tyler Boley
well you know, they're always a little behind us over there on the old LL forum... Tyler --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "scott_now_coming" <scott_now_coming@...> wrote:
> > Enjoy! > > http://www.luminous- > landscape.com/reviews/printers/Epson_Exhibition_Fiber.shtml? > main_page=product_info&cPath=20&products_id=173 >
2008-02-09 by Sarah Renkes
"Generally speaking, I shoot landscapes with a Linhof View Camera, Rodenstock HR lenses and a PhaseOne P45+ back." (<----- this is a quote fomr LL about this paper.) I love LL, but frankly, their test controls are beyond my lowly little set-up, thus I have a hard time relating. I shoot with the first 1Ds, and feel like I'm releasing the shutter of a dinosaur every time I read one of their reviews. Sarah --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Tyler Boley" <tyler@...> wrote:
> > well you know, they're always a little behind us over there on the old > LL forum... > > Tyler > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, > "scott_now_coming" <scott_now_coming@> wrote: > > > > Enjoy! > > > > http://www.luminous- > > landscape.com/reviews/printers/Epson_Exhibition_Fiber.shtml? > > main_page=product_info&cPath=20&products_id=173 > > >
2008-02-09 by David Whistance
I shouldn't worry about it - I think his images speak for themselves. Good equipment doesn't necessarily make for good images, in fact the opposite is often the case. It's really about making the best images you can with the equipment you have. David Whistance
-----Original Message----- From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Sarah Renkes Sent: 09 February 2008 03:41 To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Epson Exhibition Fiber - A Review "Generally speaking, I shoot landscapes with a Linhof View Camera, Rodenstock HR lenses and a PhaseOne P45+ back." (<----- this is a quote fomr LL about this paper.) I love LL, but frankly, their test controls are beyond my lowly little set-up, thus I have a hard time relating. I shoot with the first 1Ds, and feel like I'm releasing the shutter of a dinosaur every time I read one of their reviews. Sarah --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Tyler Boley" <tyler@...> wrote: > > well you know, they're always a little behind us over there on the old > LL forum... > > Tyler > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, > "scott_now_coming" <scott_now_coming@> wrote: > > > > Enjoy! > > > > http://www.luminous- > > landscape.com/reviews/printers/Epson_Exhibition_Fiber.shtml? > > main_page=product_info&cPath=20&products_id=173 > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2008-02-09 by Gabriel Valansi
I agree. But sometimes I learn a lot for this kind of people whit that obsession about technical issues. Always you can found something interesting and useful. El 9/2/08 07:08, "David Whistance" <david.whistance@btopenworld.com> escribió: > > > > > I shouldn't worry about it - I think his images speak for themselves. Good > equipment doesn't necessarily make for good images, in fact the opposite is > often the case. It's really about making the best images you can with the > equipment you have. > > David Whistance > > -----Original Message----- > From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> > [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> ]On Behalf Of Sarah > Renkes > Sent: 09 February 2008 03:41 > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> > Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Epson Exhibition Fiber - A Review > > "Generally speaking, I shoot landscapes with a Linhof View Camera, > Rodenstock HR lenses > and a PhaseOne P45+ back." (<----- this is a quote fomr LL about this > paper.) > > I love LL, but frankly, their test controls are beyond my lowly little > set-up, thus I have a > hard time relating. I shoot with the first 1Ds, and feel like I'm > releasing the shutter of a > dinosaur every time I read one of their reviews. > > Sarah > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> , "Tyler Boley" > <tyler@...> wrote: >> > >> > well you know, they're always a little behind us over there on the old >> > LL forum... >> > >> > Tyler >> > >> > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@...m >> <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> , >> > "scott_now_coming" <scott_now_coming@> wrote: >>> > > >>> > > Enjoy! >>> > > >>> > > http://www.luminous- >>> > > landscape.com/reviews/printers/Epson_Exhibition_Fiber.shtml? >>> > > main_page=product_info&cPath=20&products_id=173 >>> > > >> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2008-02-09 by Robert W Shearer
The one real negative if you will pardon the pun with the digital age is that far to often, it becomes more about the technology and less about the image. _____
From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@...m [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Gabriel Valansi Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2008 8:52 AM To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: Epson Exhibition Fiber - A Review I agree. But sometimes I learn a lot for this kind of people whit that obsession about technical issues. Always you can found something interesting and useful. El 9/2/08 07:08, "David Whistance" <david.whistance@ <mailto:david.whistance%40btopenworld.com> btopenworld.com> escribió: > > > > > I shouldn't worry about it - I think his images speak for themselves. Good > equipment doesn't necessarily make for good images, in fact the opposite is > often the case. It's really about making the best images you can with the > equipment you have. > > David Whistance > > -----Original Message----- > From: DigitalBlackandWhit <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> eThePrint@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> > [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhit <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> eThePrint@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> ]On Behalf Of Sarah > Renkes > Sent: 09 February 2008 03:41 > To: DigitalBlackandWhit <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> eThePrint@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> > Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Epson Exhibition Fiber - A Review > > "Generally speaking, I shoot landscapes with a Linhof View Camera, > Rodenstock HR lenses > and a PhaseOne P45+ back." (<----- this is a quote fomr LL about this > paper.) > > I love LL, but frankly, their test controls are beyond my lowly little > set-up, thus I have a > hard time relating. I shoot with the first 1Ds, and feel like I'm > releasing the shutter of a > dinosaur every time I read one of their reviews. > > Sarah > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhit <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> eThePrint@...m > <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> , "Tyler Boley" > <tyler@...> wrote: >> > >> > well you know, they're always a little behind us over there on the old >> > LL forum... >> > >> > Tyler >> > >> > --- In DigitalBlackandWhit <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> eThePrint@yahoogroups.com >> <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> , >> > "scott_now_coming" <scott_now_coming@> wrote: >>> > > >>> > > Enjoy! >>> > > >>> > > http://www.luminous <http://www.luminous-> - >>> > > landscape.com/reviews/printers/Epson_Exhibition_Fiber.shtml? >>> > > main_page=product_info&cPath=20&products_id=173 >>> > > >> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2008-02-09 by Rick Colson
Sarah wrote: "I shoot with the first 1Ds, and feel like I'm releasing the shutter of a dinosaur every time I read one of their reviews." The 1ds is still one of the very best. Maybe not as fast as the newer stuff but as far as IQ goes, it's hard to beat. Dinosaur? No. Just a little on the tortoise side. (Who won the race?) Rick
2008-02-09 by Gary Weaver
It's not photography, it's consumer electronics. So, it's quite easy to get sidetracked by the hype. gar *********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 2/9/08 at 10:28 AM Robert W Shearer wrote: >The one real negative if you will pardon the pun with the digital age is >that far to often, it becomes more about the technology and less about the >image. > > > > _____ > >From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com >[mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Gabriel >Valansi >Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2008 8:52 AM >To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com >Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: Epson Exhibition Fiber - A Review > > > > > >I agree. >But sometimes I learn a lot for this kind of people whit that obsession >about technical issues. Always you can found something interesting and >useful. > >El 9/2/08 07:08, "David Whistance" <david.whistance@ ><mailto:david.whistance%40btopenworld.com> btopenworld.com> >escribió: > >> >> >> >> >> I shouldn't worry about it - I think his images speak for themselves. >Good >> equipment doesn't necessarily make for good images, in fact the opposite >is >> often the case. It's really about making the best images you can with the >> equipment you have. >> >> David Whistance >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: DigitalBlackandWhit ><mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> >eThePrint@...m >> <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> >> [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhit ><mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> >eThePrint@yahoogroups.com >> <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> ]On Behalf Of >Sarah >> Renkes >> Sent: 09 February 2008 03:41 >> To: DigitalBlackandWhit ><mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> >eThePrint@yahoogroups.com >> <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> >> Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Epson Exhibition Fiber - A Review >> >> "Generally speaking, I shoot landscapes with a Linhof View Camera, >> Rodenstock HR lenses >> and a PhaseOne P45+ back." (<----- this is a quote fomr LL about this >> paper.) >> >> I love LL, but frankly, their test controls are beyond my lowly little >> set-up, thus I have a >> hard time relating. I shoot with the first 1Ds, and feel like I'm >> releasing the shutter of a >> dinosaur every time I read one of their reviews. >> >> Sarah >> >> --- In DigitalBlackandWhit ><mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> >eThePrint@yahoogroups.com >> <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> , "Tyler Boley" >> <tyler@...> wrote: >>> > >>> > well you know, they're always a little behind us over there on the old >>> > LL forum... >>> > >>> > Tyler >>> > >>> > --- In DigitalBlackandWhit ><mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> >eThePrint@yahoogroups.com >>> <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> , >>> > "scott_now_coming" <scott_now_coming@> wrote: >>>> > > >>>> > > Enjoy! >>>> > > >>>> > > http://www.luminous <http://www.luminous-> - >>>> > > landscape.com/reviews/printers/Epson_Exhibition_Fiber.shtml? >>>> > > main_page=product_info&cPath=20&products_id=173 >>>> > > >>> > >> >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >> >> >> > >[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > >[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > >Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as >they are often being updated. > >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > >If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to >unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same >page. > >Please follow these basic guidelines: >- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep >them short. >- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. >Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the >membership without notice. >- Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W >printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from >the membership. >- By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and >guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner >and Moderators. See Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines in the Files >section: >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > >BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT >YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE OWNER AND >MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO >YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR >EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF >PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE >OWNER AND MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN >ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE >OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) >UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) >STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT >YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE >PRINT YAHOO GROUP. > >Yahoo! Groups Links > > >
2008-02-10 by Sarah Renkes
Rick, I do love my 1Ds, though the noise factor in this camera isn't the best. Supposedly they have improved it with the newest incarnation....but that's all pretty OT here! My 1Ds thanks you for the bid. ;) Sarah --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Rick Colson <rick.colson@...> wrote:
> > Sarah wrote: > > "I shoot with the first 1Ds, and feel like I'm releasing the shutter of a > dinosaur every time I read one of their reviews." > > The 1ds is still one of the very best. Maybe not as fast as the newer stuff > but as far as IQ goes, it's hard to beat. Dinosaur? No. Just a little on the > tortoise side. (Who won the race?) > > Rick >
2008-02-10 by Sarah Renkes
--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Gary Weaver" <garww@...> wrote: > > It's not photography, it's consumer electronics. So, it's quite easy to get sidetracked by the hype. Yes, that's all too true. Which is why I often cover my eyes and quickly flip the page when I see the ads for the newest (and costliest!) stuff. And why I rarely read LL's new equipment reviews on medium format digital...I start hyperventilating. Well, that's an exaggeration....but only just. ;) Sarah
2008-02-10 by Gary Weaver
Well, it was the hobbiest that gave us the scanback. The pics are on the web somewhere. In modern terms, I'm ducking my head in the sand. recent cameras are a original canonet and a Minolta AL. I like the Minolta. http://www.flickr.com/photos/garww/2250725731/ gar *********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 2/10/08 at 12:28 AM Sarah Renkes wrote: >--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Gary Weaver" ><garww@...> >wrote: >> >> It's not photography, it's consumer electronics. So, it's quite easy to >get sidetracked by >the hype. > > >Yes, that's all too true. Which is why I often cover my eyes and quickly >flip the page when I >see the ads for the newest (and costliest!) stuff. And why I rarely read >LL's new equipment >reviews on medium format digital...I start hyperventilating. Well, that's >an >exaggeration....but only just. ;) > >Sarah > > > >Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as >they are often being updated. > >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > >If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to >unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same >page. > >Please follow these basic guidelines: >- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep >them short. >- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. >Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the >membership without notice. >- Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W >printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from >the membership. >- By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and >guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner >and Moderators. See Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines in the Files >section: >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > >BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT >YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE OWNER AND >MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO >YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR >EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF >PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE >OWNER AND MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN >ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE >OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) >UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) >STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT >YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE >PRINT YAHOO GROUP. > >Yahoo! Groups Links > > >
2008-02-10 by Sarah Renkes
yes, "old school" or whatever...the Minolta and others of that ilk are still great. Sarah --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Gary Weaver" <garww@...> wrote: > > Well, it was the hobbiest that gave us the scanback. The pics are on the web somewhere. > > In modern terms, I'm ducking my head in the sand. recent cameras are a original canonet and a Minolta AL. I like the Minolta.
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/garww/2250725731/ > > gar > > *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** > > On 2/10/08 at 12:28 AM Sarah Renkes wrote: > > >--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Gary Weaver" > ><garww@> > >wrote: > >> > >> It's not photography, it's consumer electronics. So, it's quite easy to > >get sidetracked by > >the hype. > > > > > >Yes, that's all too true. Which is why I often cover my eyes and quickly > >flip the page when I > >see the ads for the newest (and costliest!) stuff. And why I rarely read > >LL's new equipment > >reviews on medium format digital...I start hyperventilating. Well, that's > >an > >exaggeration....but only just. ;) > > > >Sarah > > > > > > > >Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as > >they are often being updated. > > > >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > > >If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to > >unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same > >page. > > > >Please follow these basic guidelines: > >- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep > >them short. > >- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. > >Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the > >membership without notice. > >- Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W > >printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from > >the membership. > >- By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and > >guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner > >and Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the Files > >section: > >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > > > >BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT > >YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER" AND > >"MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO > >YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR > >EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF > >PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE > >"OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN > >ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE > >OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) > >UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) > >STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT > >YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE > >PRINT YAHOO GROUP. > > > >Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > >
2008-02-10 by Nemo Niemann
Photography has always been about the technical. In my mind, it's the melding of the technical and the aesthetic/art. In my wet darkroom days, I had a a chart of a myriad of film/developer combinations, all of which gave me a different look/feel to the negative. In a way, the Zone System is the penultimate techie form of "analog" photography. If anything, digital has made taking photos easier for the layman -- just ask all those Art Directors turned Photographers I compete with these days, because they think "anyone" can take photos, if they have "the eye". Don't get me wrong; the equipment doesn't make the photographer, per se, but it's an extension of the eye. Photography has always been about the technical, we just never called it that, because computers weren't involved. --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Robert W Shearer" <rwshearer@...> wrote: > > The one real "negative" if you will pardon the pun with the digital age is > that far to often, it becomes more about the technology and less about the > image.
2008-02-10 by CorrPro96@aol.com
I have to disagree. Photography has always been about the craft first, the art second and the technical in terms of feasibility... whether or not it is possible. Digital has provided the technology that has enabled the craft and the art to reach into areas beyond photography, using the photographic processes. Richard Massie In a message dated 2/10/2008 1:58:37 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, nemophoto@... writes: . Photography has always been about the technical, we just never called it that, because computers weren't involved. **************Biggest Grammy Award surprises of all time on AOL Music. (http://music.aol.com/grammys/pictures/never-won-a-grammy?NCID=aolcmp003000000025 48) [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2008-02-10 by Steve Kale
Art has long been about the combination of technical skill to express a vision. You can only be stronger at expressing your vision by having a good grasp of the tools of the trade. Digital is no different from analogue in this respect. On 10 Feb 2008, at 19:10, CorrPro96@... wrote: > I have to disagree. > Photography has always been about the craft first, the art second > and the > technical in terms of feasibility... whether or not it is possible. > Digital has provided the technology that has enabled the craft and > the art > to reach into areas beyond photography, using the photographic > processes. > > Richard Massie > > > In a message dated 2/10/2008 1:58:37 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, > nemophoto@... writes: > > . Photography > has always been about the technical, we just never called it that, > because computers weren't involved. > > **************Biggest Grammy Award surprises of all time on AOL Music. > (http://music.aol.com/grammys/pictures/never-won-a-grammy? > NCID=aolcmp003000000025 > 48) > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2008-02-10 by Robert W Shearer
Nah, photography is about a lot of things but the least is technology. The ability to see an image in the mind where no one else has, the instinct to be somewhere, the presence of mind to capture that image while everyone else is standing around with their mouths wide open, the pure instinct to understand the story that you can tell if you capture the image. That is photography. Just as CEO's hire mathematicians but don't do the math, generals have soldiers but don't do the fighting. That is the technical aspect of photography. You can be a great photographer without ever being a technician but you will never be a great photographer no matter how great a technician you are in the darkroom or with an inkjet printer. Ansel Adams was first a great photographer who took Fred Archer's idea and applied art to technology. When was the last time you said, oh look! There is a picture by Fred Archer. _____
From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Nemo Niemann Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2008 1:58 PM To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Epson Exhibition Fiber - A Review Photography has always been about the technical. In my mind, it's the melding of the technical and the aesthetic/art. In my wet darkroom days, I had a a chart of a myriad of film/developer combinations, all of which gave me a different look/feel to the negative. In a way, the Zone System is the penultimate techie form of "analog" photography. If anything, digital has made taking photos easier for the layman -- just ask all those Art Directors turned Photographers I compete with these days, because they think "anyone" can take photos, if they have "the eye". Don't get me wrong; the equipment doesn't make the photographer, per se, but it's an extension of the eye. Photography has always been about the technical, we just never called it that, because computers weren't involved. --- In DigitalBlackandWhit <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> eThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Robert W Shearer" <rwshearer@...> wrote: > > The one real "negative" if you will pardon the pun with the digital age is > that far to often, it becomes more about the technology and less about the > image. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2008-02-10 by Mike Johnston
I don't think you can separate craft from technology. What is art? Maybe photography is something different to each of us. Mike J.
-----Original Message----- From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Nemo Niemann Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2008 11:58 AM To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Epson Exhibition Fiber - A Review Photography has always been about the technical. In my mind, it's the melding of the technical and the aesthetic/art. In my wet darkroom days, I had a a chart of a myriad of film/developer combinations, all of which gave me a different look/feel to the negative. In a way, the Zone System is the penultimate techie form of "analog" photography. If anything, digital has made taking photos easier for the layman -- just ask all those Art Directors turned Photographers I compete with these days, because they think "anyone" can take photos, if they have "the eye". Don't get me wrong; the equipment doesn't make the photographer, per se, but it's an extension of the eye. Photography has always been about the technical, we just never called it that, because computers weren't involved. --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Robert W Shearer" <rwshearer@...> wrote: > > The one real "negative" if you will pardon the pun with the digital age is > that far to often, it becomes more about the technology and less about the > image.
2008-02-10 by Steve Kale
Nonsense. If don't know how to use your camera you can't take a picture. Just as a painter must know how to handle a brush in order to capture on canvas the image in his/her mind's eye, a photographer needs to know how to handle the tools of his trade. Else you can daydream all you want but not be able to share that creativity in a photo. Now of course, technical ability doesn't make you an artist. But it's hard to practice without both creative and technical skills. Explore both. On 10 Feb 2008, at 20:18, Robert W Shearer wrote: > Nah, photography is about a lot of things but the least is > technology. The > ability to see an image in the mind where no one else has, the > instinct to > be somewhere, the presence of mind to capture that image while > everyone else > is standing around with their mouths wide open, the pure instinct to > understand the story that you can tell if you capture the image. > That is > photography. Just as CEO's hire mathematicians but don't do the math, > generals have soldiers but don't do the fighting. That is the > technical > aspect of photography. You can be a great photographer without ever > being a > technician but you will never be a great photographer no matter how > great a > technician you are in the darkroom or with an inkjet printer. Ansel > Adams > was first a great photographer who took Fred Archer's idea and > applied art > to technology. When was the last time you said, oh look! There is a > picture > by Fred Archer. > > _____ > > From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of > Nemo > Niemann > Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2008 1:58 PM > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Epson Exhibition Fiber - A Review > > Photography has always been about the technical. In my mind, it's the > melding of the technical and the aesthetic/art. In my wet darkroom > days, I had a a chart of a myriad of film/developer combinations, all > of which gave me a different look/feel to the negative. In a way, the > Zone System is the penultimate techie form of "analog" photography. > > If anything, digital has made taking photos easier for the layman -- > just ask all those Art Directors turned Photographers I compete with > these days, because they think "anyone" can take photos, if they have > "the eye". Don't get me wrong; the equipment doesn't make the > photographer, per se, but it's an extension of the eye. Photography > has always been about the technical, we just never called it that, > because computers weren't involved. > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhit > <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> > eThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Robert W > Shearer" <rwshearer@...> wrote: > > > > The one real "negative" if you will pardon the pun with the digital > age is > > that far to often, it becomes more about the technology and less > about the > > image. > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2008-02-10 by Robert W Shearer
Sorry you were not able to understand the post. You are confusing the ability to use the equipment with tech anal retentiveness. An artist knows how to use his brush but he does not spend hours and days agonizing over the best wood for the handle, a writer uses his computer but he does not lose himself in the process of which the computer uses to put his words on the screen nor do the great musicians of the world lose much sleep over the electronic process which amplifies their voice. The only daydream here is that which would believe that mechanics are artists.
-----Original Message----- From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Steve Kale Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2008 5:46 PM To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: Epson Exhibition Fiber - A Review Nonsense. If don't know how to use your camera you can't take a picture. Just as a painter must know how to handle a brush in order to capture on canvas the image in his/her mind's eye, a photographer needs to know how to handle the tools of his trade. Else you can daydream all you want but not be able to share that creativity in a photo. Now of course, technical ability doesn't make you an artist. But it's hard to practice without both creative and technical skills. Explore both. On 10 Feb 2008, at 20:18, Robert W Shearer wrote: > Nah, photography is about a lot of things but the least is > technology. The > ability to see an image in the mind where no one else has, the > instinct to > be somewhere, the presence of mind to capture that image while > everyone else > is standing around with their mouths wide open, the pure instinct to > understand the story that you can tell if you capture the image. > That is > photography. Just as CEO's hire mathematicians but don't do the math, > generals have soldiers but don't do the fighting. That is the > technical > aspect of photography. You can be a great photographer without ever > being a > technician but you will never be a great photographer no matter how > great a > technician you are in the darkroom or with an inkjet printer. Ansel > Adams > was first a great photographer who took Fred Archer's idea and > applied art > to technology. When was the last time you said, oh look! There is a > picture > by Fred Archer. > > _____ > > From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of > Nemo > Niemann > Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2008 1:58 PM > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Epson Exhibition Fiber - A Review > > Photography has always been about the technical. In my mind, it's the > melding of the technical and the aesthetic/art. In my wet darkroom > days, I had a a chart of a myriad of film/developer combinations, all > of which gave me a different look/feel to the negative. In a way, the > Zone System is the penultimate techie form of "analog" photography. > > If anything, digital has made taking photos easier for the layman -- > just ask all those Art Directors turned Photographers I compete with > these days, because they think "anyone" can take photos, if they have > "the eye". Don't get me wrong; the equipment doesn't make the > photographer, per se, but it's an extension of the eye. Photography > has always been about the technical, we just never called it that, > because computers weren't involved. > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhit > <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> > eThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Robert W > Shearer" <rwshearer@...> wrote: > > > > The one real "negative" if you will pardon the pun with the digital > age is > > that far to often, it becomes more about the technology and less > about the > > image. > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as they are often being updated. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. Please follow these basic guidelines: - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the membership without notice. - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from the membership. - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the Files section: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP. Yahoo! Groups Links
2008-02-10 by CorrPro96@aol.com
The "tools" that attach to photography vary from a pinhole in a cereal box to a complex view camera. There are many flavors in between. Technology, for me, has been more an obstacle to my craft than a benefit, once the Leica was available. Many of us relied on the Professionals in the color labs for the technical stuff. Many accomplished photographers never printed their negatives, while many others only shot E-6 and dropped off their film. I, like many others, relied on an expert printer for my darkroom work, until I learned to make a fine print . It has always been the vision that photographers have had to have, not sophisticated, technical equipment. I have seen many a professional photographer's work that is not even in focus and never the less published, talk about learning to use their cameras. You really have me wondering what your photographs look like. Richard Massie In a message dated 2/10/2008 5:46:13 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, stevekale@... writes: Nonsense. If don't know how to use your camera you can't take a picture. Just as a painter must know how to handle a brush in order to capture on canvas the image in his/her mind's eye, a photographer needs to know how to handle the tools of his trade. Else you can daydream all you want but not be able to share that creativity in a photo. Now of course, technical ability doesn't make you an artist. But it's hard to practice without both creative and technical skills. Explore both. **************Biggest Grammy Award surprises of all time on AOL Music. (http://music.aol.com/grammys/pictures/never-won-a-grammy?NCID=aolcmp003000000025 48) [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2008-02-10 by Greg
--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Robert W Shearer" <rwshearer@...> wrote: > > nor do the great musicians of the world lose much sleep over the > electronic process which amplifies their voice. The only daydream here is > that which would believe that mechanics are artists. > That is so very wrong. Many vocalists (general term) spend large amounts of time testing microphones, preamps, etc. Drummers search through scores of heads, sticks, pedals, drum shells, cymbols, etc. Guitarists may spend a huge amount of time on the brand and model of strings alone, then when you get into the instrument body, electronic pickups, amplifier, speaker cabinet, and microphone for a particular sound. Any of the top musicians will be able to resite a long lineage of equipment that they've tried, and particularly the stuff that did not work. Take any top level performer and ask them why they are using the instruments that they use, and they will be able to tell you, and it goes way beyond getting free stuff from the manufacturer. At the top level most have enough money that free no longer means anything, they simply want what works best for them, and don't really care about what other people would like them to use. Is a bargin Yamaha violin as good as a top level Statovarius violin? They make the same notes when played...
2008-02-10 by Steve Kale
Keep wondering while I learn to use my camera - damn technical things! ;-) On 10 Feb 2008, at 23:43, CorrPro96@... wrote: > The "tools" that attach to photography vary from a pinhole in a > cereal box > to a complex view camera. There are many flavors in between. > Technology, for > me, has been more an obstacle to my craft than a benefit, once the > Leica was > available. Many of us relied on the Professionals in the color labs > for the > technical stuff. Many accomplished photographers never printed > their negatives, > while many others only shot E-6 and dropped off their film. I, like > many > others, relied on an expert printer for my darkroom work, until I > learned to make > a fine print . It has always been the vision that photographers > have had to > have, not sophisticated, technical equipment. I have seen many a > professional > photographer's work that is not even in focus and never the less > published, > talk about learning to use their cameras. > You really have me wondering what your photographs look like. > > Richard Massie > > > In a message dated 2/10/2008 5:46:13 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, > stevekale@... writes: > > Nonsense. If don't know how to use your camera you can't take a > picture. Just as a painter must know how to handle a brush in order > to capture on canvas the image in his/her mind's eye, a photographer > needs to know how to handle the tools of his trade. Else you can > daydream all you want but not be able to share that creativity in a > photo. Now of course, technical ability doesn't make you an artist. > But it's hard to practice without both creative and technical > skills. Explore both. > > **************Biggest Grammy Award surprises of all time on AOL Music. > (http://music.aol.com/grammys/pictures/never-won-a-grammy? > NCID=aolcmp003000000025 > 48) > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2008-02-10 by CorrPro96@aol.com
LOL Richard Massie In a message dated 2/10/2008 6:47:06 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, stevekale@... writes: Keep wondering while I learn to use my camera - damn technical things! ;-) **************Biggest Grammy Award surprises of all time on AOL Music. (http://music.aol.com/grammys/pictures/never-won-a-grammy?NCID=aolcmp003000000025 48) [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2008-02-10 by Mitch Greenwald
I believe that Steve Kale did indeed understand the post, and I agree with him. You are certainly correct that all mechanics are not photographers . . . but all photographers must be mechanics in some fashion. I've photographed and processed -- both wet and digital -- for over fifty years. I can't recall any form of photography that didn't require a fair amount of technical knowhow. How much depends on each individual's choices. As with anything else, at some point an extra investment (either time or money) in technique yields increasingly small improvement in result. The wasted time and energy beyond this point is unfortunate . . . you can call it anal retentiveness if that's your choice of concepts. But at the other end, all of us have seen in our own work and that of others well-conceived ideas that we didn't have the ability to execute. Turn it around -- eliminating all the technical stuff (think point-and-shoot, program mode, etc) is possible, yet how many of us rely on it exclusively? Mitch
On Feb 10, 2008, at 6:32 PM, Robert W Shearer wrote: > Sorry you were not able to understand the post. You are confusing the > ability to use the equipment with tech anal retentiveness. An artist > knows > how to use his brush but he does not spend hours and days agonizing > over the > best wood for the handle, a writer uses his computer but he does not > lose > himself in the process of which the computer uses to put his words on > the > screen nor do the great musicians of the world lose much sleep over the > electronic process which amplifies their voice. The only daydream here > is > that which would believe that mechanics are artists. > > -----Original Message----- > From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of > Steve > Kale > Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2008 5:46 PM > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: Epson Exhibition Fiber - A Review > > Nonsense. If don't know how to use your camera you can't take a > picture. Just as a painter must know how to handle a brush in order > to capture on canvas the image in his/her mind's eye, a photographer > needs to know how to handle the tools of his trade. Else you can > daydream all you want but not be able to share that creativity in a > photo. Now of course, technical ability doesn't make you an artist. > But it's hard to practice without both creative and technical > skills. Explore both. > > > On 10 Feb 2008, at 20:18, Robert W Shearer wrote: > >> Nah, photography is about a lot of things but the least is >> technology. The >> ability to see an image in the mind where no one else has, the >> instinct to >> be somewhere, the presence of mind to capture that image while >> everyone else >> is standing around with their mouths wide open, the pure instinct to >> understand the story that you can tell if you capture the image. >> That is >> photography. Just as CEO's hire mathematicians but don't do the math, >> generals have soldiers but don't do the fighting. That is the >> technical >> aspect of photography. You can be a great photographer without ever >> being a >> technician but you will never be a great photographer no matter how >> great a >> technician you are in the darkroom or with an inkjet printer. Ansel >> Adams >> was first a great photographer who took Fred Archer's idea and >> applied art >> to technology. When was the last time you said, oh look! There is a >> picture >> by Fred Archer. >> >> _____ >> >> From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com >> [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of >> Nemo >> Niemann >> Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2008 1:58 PM >> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com >> Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Epson Exhibition Fiber - A Review >> >> Photography has always been about the technical. In my mind, it's the >> melding of the technical and the aesthetic/art. In my wet darkroom >> days, I had a a chart of a myriad of film/developer combinations, all >> of which gave me a different look/feel to the negative. In a way, the >> Zone System is the penultimate techie form of "analog" photography. >> >> If anything, digital has made taking photos easier for the layman -- >> just ask all those Art Directors turned Photographers I compete with >> these days, because they think "anyone" can take photos, if they have >> "the eye". Don't get me wrong; the equipment doesn't make the >> photographer, per se, but it's an extension of the eye. Photography >> has always been about the technical, we just never called it that, >> because computers weren't involved. >> >> --- In DigitalBlackandWhit >> <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> >> eThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Robert W >> Shearer" <rwshearer@...> wrote: >>> >>> The one real "negative" if you will pardon the pun with the digital >> age is >>> that far to often, it becomes more about the technology and less >> about the >>> image. >> >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >> >> >> > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other > resources as > they are often being updated. > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to > unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this > same > page. > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to > keep > them short. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. > Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the > membership without notice. > - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W > printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed > from > the membership. > - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and > guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group > Owner and > Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the Files > section: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > > BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE > PRINT > YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER" AND > "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE > TO YOU > FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR > EXEMPLARY > DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, > GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE "OWNER" > AND > "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF > THE > POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE > INABILITY > TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS > TO OR > ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT > OF ANY > THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER > MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP. > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other > resources as they are often being updated. > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish > to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting > this same page. > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to > keep them short. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or > flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from > the membership without notice. > - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital > B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be > removed from the membership. > - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and > guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group > Owner and Moderators. See “Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines” in the > Files section: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > > BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE > PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE “OWNER” > AND “MODERATORS” OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE > LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, > CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, > DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE > LOSSES (EVEN IF THE “OWNER” AND “MODERATORS” OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT > YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), > RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, > THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF > YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD > PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER > MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP. > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > >
2008-02-10 by Gary Weaver
I half disagree. Printing is a craft. Creating the image is the art. gar *********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 2/10/08 at 2:10 PM CorrPro96@aol.com wrote: >I have to disagree. >Photography has always been about the craft first, the art second and the >technical in terms of feasibility... whether or not it is possible. >Digital has provided the technology that has enabled the craft and the art > >to reach into areas beyond photography, using the photographic processes. > >Richard Massie > > >In a message dated 2/10/2008 1:58:37 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, >nemophoto@earthlink.net writes: > >. Photography >has always been about the technical, we just never called it that, >because computers weren't involved. > > > > > >**************Biggest Grammy Award surprises of all time on AOL Music. >(http://music.aol.com/grammys/pictures/never-won-a-grammy?NCID=aolcmp003000000025 >48) > > >[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > >Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as >they are often being updated. > >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > >If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to >unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same >page. > >Please follow these basic guidelines: >- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep >them short. >- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. >Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the >membership without notice. >- Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W >printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from >the membership. >- By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and >guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner >and Moderators. See �Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines� in the Files >section: >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > >BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT >YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE �OWNER� AND >�MODERATORS� OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO >YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR >EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF >PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE >�OWNER� AND �MODERATORS� OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN >ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE >OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) >UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) >STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT >YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE >PRINT YAHOO GROUP. > >Yahoo! Groups Links > > >
2008-02-11 by Robert W Shearer
Yes, the best analysis so far. This seems to be a bit of a touchy subject. This looks like a new addition to the Windows/Apple, Nikon/Canon, Life v Death hardcore issues. Did not know that I was going there!
-----Original Message----- From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Gary Weaver Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2008 6:59 PM To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: Epson Exhibition Fiber - A Review I half disagree. Printing is a craft. Creating the image is the art. gar *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** On 2/10/08 at 2:10 PM CorrPro96@...m wrote: >I have to disagree. >Photography has always been about the craft first, the art second and the >technical in terms of feasibility... whether or not it is possible. >Digital has provided the technology that has enabled the craft and the art > >to reach into areas beyond photography, using the photographic processes. > >Richard Massie > > >In a message dated 2/10/2008 1:58:37 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, >nemophoto@... writes: > >. Photography >has always been about the technical, we just never called it that, >because computers weren't involved. > > > > > >**************Biggest Grammy Award surprises of all time on AOL Music. >(http://music.aol.com/grammys/pictures/never-won-a-grammy?NCID=aolcmp003000 000025 >48) > > >[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > >Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as >they are often being updated. > >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > >If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to >unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same >page. > >Please follow these basic guidelines: >- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep >them short. >- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. >Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the >membership without notice. >- Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W >printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from >the membership. >- By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and >guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner >and Moderators. See Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines in the Files >section: >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > >BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT >YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE OWNER AND >MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO >YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR >EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF >PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE >OWNER AND MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN >ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE >OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) >UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) >STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT >YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE >PRINT YAHOO GROUP. > >Yahoo! Groups Links > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as they are often being updated. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. Please follow these basic guidelines: - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the membership without notice. - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from the membership. - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and Moderators. See Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines in the Files section: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE OWNER AND MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE OWNER AND MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP. Yahoo! Groups Links
2008-02-11 by Gary Weaver
Ha!!! The Scribe was a craftsman, and sure, art could play a part. But in all printing, it's always been a craft. The primary effort is to reproduce faithfully and art has nothing to do with that. Don't tell printers that printing isn't a craft. And I'm proud to learn the old craft. I've inked up all sorts of stuff. gar *********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 2/10/08 at 7:34 PM Robert W Shearer wrote: >Yes, the best analysis so far. This seems to be a bit of a touchy subject. >This looks like a new addition to the Windows/Apple, Nikon/Canon, Life v >Death hardcore issues. Did not know that I was going there! > >-----Original Message----- >From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com >[mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Gary >Weaver >Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2008 6:59 PM >To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com >Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: Epson Exhibition Fiber - A Review > >I half disagree. Printing is a craft. Creating the image is the art. > >gar > >*********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** > >On 2/10/08 at 2:10 PM CorrPro96@... wrote: > >>I have to disagree. >>Photography has always been about the craft first, the art second and the > >>technical in terms of feasibility... whether or not it is possible. >>Digital has provided the technology that has enabled the craft and the art >> >>to reach into areas beyond photography, using the photographic processes. >> >>Richard Massie >> >> >>In a message dated 2/10/2008 1:58:37 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, >>nemophoto@... writes: >> >>. Photography >>has always been about the technical, we just never called it that, >>because computers weren't involved. >> >> >> >> >> >>**************Biggest Grammy Award surprises of all time on AOL Music. > >>(http://music.aol.com/grammys/pictures/never-won-a-grammy?NCID=aolcmp003000 >000025 >>48) >> >> >>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >> >> >> >>Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as >>they are often being updated. >> >>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint >> >>If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to >>unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same >>page. >> >>Please follow these basic guidelines: >>- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep >>them short. >>- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. >>Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the >>membership without notice. >>- Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W >>printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from >>the membership. >>- By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and >>guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner >>and Moderators. See Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines in the Files >>section: >>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ >> >>BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT >>YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE OWNER AND >>MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO >>YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR >>EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF >>PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE >>OWNER AND MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN >>ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE >>OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) >>UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) >>STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT >>YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE >>PRINT YAHOO GROUP. >> >>Yahoo! Groups Links >> >> >> > > > > >Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as >they are often being updated. > >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > >If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to >unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same >page. > >Please follow these basic guidelines: >- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep >them short. >- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. >Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the >membership without notice. >- Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W >printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from >the membership. >- By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and >guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner >and >Moderators. See Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines in the Files section: >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > >BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT >YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE OWNER AND >MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO >YOU >FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY >DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, >GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE OWNER AND >MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE >POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY >TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO >OR >ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF >ANY >THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER >MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP. > >Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > >Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as >they are often being updated. > >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > >If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to >unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same >page. > >Please follow these basic guidelines: >- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep >them short. >- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. >Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the >membership without notice. >- Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W >printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from >the membership. >- By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and >guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner >and Moderators. See �Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines� in the Files >section: >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > >BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT >YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE �OWNER� AND >�MODERATORS� OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO >YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR >EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF >PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE >�OWNER� AND �MODERATORS� OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN >ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE >OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) >UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) >STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT >YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE >PRINT YAHOO GROUP. > >Yahoo! Groups Links > > >
2008-02-11 by Brad Smith
For whatever it is worth..... I knew the "producer" for a highly successful Los Angeles commercial photographer a number of years ago. The assistants would light the shot, determine proper exposure through polaroids, "lock down" the exposure on the camera then hand it to the photograher. He'd then direct the models, compose, manually focus and expose, maybe have the lighting revised between sequences, then do the same again. The film was sent to a commercial lab and they got it back, generally the next day. Chosen images went to the client. So how was this highly successful, nationally famous commercial photographer a "technician"? His brilliance was in conceiving the shots, getting the best from his models, composing and focus. I see nothing in what he personally did that I'd call technical. It was entirely artistic. I think that the technical side of photography then, and now, is 95% in print making.....old darkroom or new image processing/printing. Brad
On Feb 10, 2008, at 4:46 PM, Gary Weaver wrote: > Ha!!! > > The Scribe was a craftsman, and sure, art could play a part. But in > all printing, it's always been a craft. The primary effort is to > reproduce faithfully and art has nothing to do with that. > > Don't tell printers that printing isn't a craft. And I'm proud to > learn the old craft. I've inked up all sorts of stuff. > > gar > > *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** > > On 2/10/08 at 7:34 PM Robert W Shearer wrote: > >> Yes, the best analysis so far. This seems to be a bit of a touchy >> subject. >> This looks like a new addition to the Windows/Apple, Nikon/Canon, >> Life v >> Death hardcore issues. Did not know that I was going there! >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com >> [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of >> Gary >> Weaver >> Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2008 6:59 PM >> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com >> Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: Epson Exhibition Fiber - A Review >> >> I half disagree. Printing is a craft. Creating the image is the art. >> >> gar >> >> *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** >> >> On 2/10/08 at 2:10 PM CorrPro96@... wrote: >> >>> I have to disagree. >>> Photography has always been about the craft first, the art second >>> and the >> >>> technical in terms of feasibility... whether or not it is possible. >>> Digital has provided the technology that has enabled the craft >>> and the art >>> >>> to reach into areas beyond photography, using the photographic >>> processes. >>> >>> Richard Massie >>> >>> >>> In a message dated 2/10/2008 1:58:37 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, >>> nemophoto@... writes: >>> >>> . Photography >>> has always been about the technical, we just never called it that, >>> because computers weren't involved. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> **************Biggest Grammy Award surprises of all time on AOL >>> Music. >> >>> (http://music.aol.com/grammys/pictures/never-won-a-grammy? >>> NCID=aolcmp003000 >> 000025 >>> 48) >>> >>> >>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >>> >>> >>> >>> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other >>> resources as >>> they are often being updated. >>> >>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint >>> >>> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you >>> wish to >>> unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting >>> this same >>> page. >>> >>> Please follow these basic guidelines: >>> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier >>> messages to keep >>> them short. >>> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or >>> flames. >>> Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the >>> membership without notice. >>> - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of >>> digital B&W >>> printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be >>> removed from >>> the membership. >>> - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and >>> guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the >>> group Owner >>> and Moderators. See Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines in the Files >>> section: >>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ >>> >>> BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, >>> THE PRINT >>> YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE OWNER AND >>> MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE >>> LIABLE TO >>> YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR >>> EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF >>> PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE >>> OWNER AND MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP >>> HAVE BEEN >>> ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) >>> THE USE >>> OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) >>> UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR >>> DATA; (iii) >>> STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE >>> PRINT >>> YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, >>> THE >>> PRINT YAHOO GROUP. >>> >>> Yahoo! Groups Links >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other >> resources as >> they are often being updated. >> >> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint >> >> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you >> wish to >> unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting >> this same >> page. >> >> Please follow these basic guidelines: >> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages >> to keep >> them short. >> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or >> flames. >> Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the >> membership without notice. >> - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of >> digital B&W >> printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be >> removed from >> the membership. >> - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and >> guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group >> Owner >> and >> Moderators. See Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines in the Files >> section: >> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ >> >> BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE >> PRINT >> YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE OWNER AND >> MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE >> LIABLE TO >> YOU >> FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR >> EXEMPLARY >> DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, >> GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE >> OWNER AND >> MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN >> ADVISED OF THE >> POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE >> INABILITY >> TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED >> ACCESS TO >> OR >> ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR >> CONDUCT OF >> ANY >> THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY >> OTHER >> MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP. >> >> Yahoo! Groups Links >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other >> resources as >> they are often being updated. >> >> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint >> >> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you >> wish to >> unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting >> this same >> page. >> >> Please follow these basic guidelines: >> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages >> to keep >> them short. >> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or >> flames. >> Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the >> membership without notice. >> - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of >> digital B&W >> printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be >> removed from >> the membership. >> - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and >> guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group >> Owner >> and Moderators. See Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines in the Files >> section: >> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ >> >> BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE >> PRINT >> YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE OWNER AND >> MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE >> LIABLE TO >> YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR >> EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF >> PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE >> OWNER AND MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE >> BEEN >> ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) >> THE USE >> OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) >> UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR >> DATA; (iii) >> STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT >> YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE >> PRINT YAHOO GROUP. >> >> Yahoo! Groups Links >> >> >> > > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other > resources as they are often being updated. > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you > wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by > visiting this same page. > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages > to keep them short. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or > flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed > from the membership without notice. > - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital > B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be > removed from the membership. > - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules > and guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the > group Owner and Moderators. See Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines > in the Files section: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > > BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE > PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE > OWNER AND MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL > NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, > CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, > DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER > INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE OWNER AND MODERATORS OF DIGITAL > BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF > SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE > THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO > OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR > CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO > GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE > PRINT YAHOO GROUP. > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > >
2008-02-11 by Gary Weaver
No argument. The busy "pro" zones his proofs and lets the technicans do their magic. He's got better things to do. Like walk around the park with the 35 as in the movie Blow Up : ) gar. *********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 2/10/08 at 6:00 PM Brad Smith wrote: >For whatever it is worth..... >I knew the "producer" for a highly successful Los Angeles commercial >photographer a number of years ago. The assistants would light the >shot, determine proper exposure through polaroids, "lock down" the >exposure on the camera then hand it to the photograher. He'd then >direct the models, compose, manually focus and expose, maybe have the >lighting revised between sequences, then do the same again. The film >was sent to a commercial lab and they got it back, generally the next >day. Chosen images went to the client. > >So how was this highly successful, nationally famous commercial >photographer a "technician"? His brilliance was in conceiving the >shots, getting the best from his models, composing and focus. I see >nothing in what he personally did that I'd call technical. It was >entirely artistic. > >I think that the technical side of photography then, and now, is 95% >in print making.....old darkroom or new image processing/printing. >Brad > >On Feb 10, 2008, at 4:46 PM, Gary Weaver wrote: > >> Ha!!! >> >> The Scribe was a craftsman, and sure, art could play a part. But in >> all printing, it's always been a craft. The primary effort is to >> reproduce faithfully and art has nothing to do with that. >> >> Don't tell printers that printing isn't a craft. And I'm proud to >> learn the old craft. I've inked up all sorts of stuff. >> >> gar >> >> *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** >> >> On 2/10/08 at 7:34 PM Robert W Shearer wrote: >> >>> Yes, the best analysis so far. This seems to be a bit of a touchy >>> subject. >>> This looks like a new addition to the Windows/Apple, Nikon/Canon, >>> Life v >>> Death hardcore issues. Did not know that I was going there! >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com >>> [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of >>> Gary >>> Weaver >>> Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2008 6:59 PM >>> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com >>> Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: Epson Exhibition Fiber - A Review >>> >>> I half disagree. Printing is a craft. Creating the image is the art. >>> >>> gar >>> >>> *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** >>> >>> On 2/10/08 at 2:10 PM CorrPro96@... wrote: >>> >>>> I have to disagree. >>>> Photography has always been about the craft first, the art second >>>> and the >>> >>>> technical in terms of feasibility... whether or not it is possible. >>>> Digital has provided the technology that has enabled the craft >>>> and the art >>>> >>>> to reach into areas beyond photography, using the photographic >>>> processes. >>>> >>>> Richard Massie >>>> >>>> >>>> In a message dated 2/10/2008 1:58:37 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, >>>> nemophoto@earthlink.net writes: >>>> >>>> . Photography >>>> has always been about the technical, we just never called it that, >>>> because computers weren't involved. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> **************Biggest Grammy Award surprises of all time on AOL >>>> Music. >>> >>>> (http://music.aol.com/grammys/pictures/never-won-a-grammy? >>>> NCID=aolcmp003000 >>> 000025 >>>> 48) >>>> >>>> >>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other >>>> resources as >>>> they are often being updated. >>>> >>>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint >>>> >>>> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you >>>> wish to >>>> unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting >>>> this same >>>> page. >>>> >>>> Please follow these basic guidelines: >>>> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier >>>> messages to keep >>>> them short. >>>> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or >>>> flames. >>>> Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the >>>> membership without notice. >>>> - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of >>>> digital B&W >>>> printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be >>>> removed from >>>> the membership. >>>> - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and >>>> guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the >>>> group Owner >>>> and Moderators. See Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines in the Files >>>> section: >>>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ >>>> >>>> BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, >>>> THE PRINT >>>> YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE OWNER AND >>>> MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE >>>> LIABLE TO >>>> YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR >>>> EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF >>>> PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE >>>> OWNER AND MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP >>>> HAVE BEEN >>>> ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) >>>> THE USE >>>> OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) >>>> UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR >>>> DATA; (iii) >>>> STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE >>>> PRINT >>>> YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, >>>> THE >>>> PRINT YAHOO GROUP. >>>> >>>> Yahoo! Groups Links >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other >>> resources as >>> they are often being updated. >>> >>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint >>> >>> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you >>> wish to >>> unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting >>> this same >>> page. >>> >>> Please follow these basic guidelines: >>> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages >>> to keep >>> them short. >>> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or >>> flames. >>> Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the >>> membership without notice. >>> - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of >>> digital B&W >>> printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be >>> removed from >>> the membership. >>> - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and >>> guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group >>> Owner >>> and >>> Moderators. See Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines in the Files >>> section: >>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ >>> >>> BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE >>> PRINT >>> YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE OWNER AND >>> MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE >>> LIABLE TO >>> YOU >>> FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR >>> EXEMPLARY >>> DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, >>> GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE >>> OWNER AND >>> MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN >>> ADVISED OF THE >>> POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE >>> INABILITY >>> TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED >>> ACCESS TO >>> OR >>> ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR >>> CONDUCT OF >>> ANY >>> THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY >>> OTHER >>> MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP. >>> >>> Yahoo! Groups Links >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other >>> resources as >>> they are often being updated. >>> >>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint >>> >>> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you >>> wish to >>> unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting >>> this same >>> page. >>> >>> Please follow these basic guidelines: >>> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages >>> to keep >>> them short. >>> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or >>> flames. >>> Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the >>> membership without notice. >>> - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of >>> digital B&W >>> printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be >>> removed from >>> the membership. >>> - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and >>> guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group >>> Owner >>> and Moderators. See Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines in the Files >>> section: >>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ >>> >>> BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE >>> PRINT >>> YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE OWNER AND >>> MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE >>> LIABLE TO >>> YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR >>> EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF >>> PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE >>> OWNER AND MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE >>> BEEN >>> ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) >>> THE USE >>> OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) >>> UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR >>> DATA; (iii) >>> STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT >>> YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE >>> PRINT YAHOO GROUP. >>> >>> Yahoo! Groups Links >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other >> resources as they are often being updated. >> >> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint >> >> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you >> wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by >> visiting this same page. >> >> Please follow these basic guidelines: >> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages >> to keep them short. >> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or >> flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed >> from the membership without notice. >> - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital >> B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be >> removed from the membership. >> - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules >> and guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the >> group Owner and Moderators. See Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines >> in the Files section: >> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ >> >> BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE >> PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE >> OWNER AND MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL >> NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, >> CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, >> DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER >> INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE OWNER AND MODERATORS OF DIGITAL >> BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF >> SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE >> THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO >> OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR >> CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO >> GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE >> PRINT YAHOO GROUP. >> >> Yahoo! Groups Links >> >> >> > > > >Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as >they are often being updated. > >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > >If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to >unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same >page. > >Please follow these basic guidelines: >- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep >them short. >- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. >Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the >membership without notice. >- Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W >printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from >the membership. >- By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and >guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner >and Moderators. See Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines in the Files >section: >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > >BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT >YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE OWNER AND >MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO >YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR >EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF >PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE >OWNER AND MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN >ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE >OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) >UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) >STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT >YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE >PRINT YAHOO GROUP. > >Yahoo! Groups Links > > >
2008-02-11 by Robert W Shearer
My point exactly. _____
From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Brad Smith Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2008 9:01 PM To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: Epson Exhibition Fiber - A Review For whatever it is worth..... I knew the "producer" for a highly successful Los Angeles commercial photographer a number of years ago. The assistants would light the shot, determine proper exposure through polaroids, "lock down" the exposure on the camera then hand it to the photograher. He'd then direct the models, compose, manually focus and expose, maybe have the lighting revised between sequences, then do the same again. The film was sent to a commercial lab and they got it back, generally the next day. Chosen images went to the client. So how was this highly successful, nationally famous commercial photographer a "technician"? His brilliance was in conceiving the shots, getting the best from his models, composing and focus. I see nothing in what he personally did that I'd call technical. It was entirely artistic. I think that the technical side of photography then, and now, is 95% in print making.....old darkroom or new image processing/printing. Brad On Feb 10, 2008, at 4:46 PM, Gary Weaver wrote: > Ha!!! > > The Scribe was a craftsman, and sure, art could play a part. But in > all printing, it's always been a craft. The primary effort is to > reproduce faithfully and art has nothing to do with that. > > Don't tell printers that printing isn't a craft. And I'm proud to > learn the old craft. I've inked up all sorts of stuff. > > gar > > *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** > > On 2/10/08 at 7:34 PM Robert W Shearer wrote: > >> Yes, the best analysis so far. This seems to be a bit of a touchy >> subject. >> This looks like a new addition to the Windows/Apple, Nikon/Canon, >> Life v >> Death hardcore issues. Did not know that I was going there! >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: DigitalBlackandWhit <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> eThePrint@yahoogroups.com >> [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhit <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> eThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of >> Gary >> Weaver >> Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2008 6:59 PM >> To: DigitalBlackandWhit <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> eThePrint@yahoogroups.com >> Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: Epson Exhibition Fiber - A Review >> >> I half disagree. Printing is a craft. Creating the image is the art. >> >> gar >> >> *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** >> >> On 2/10/08 at 2:10 PM CorrPro96@aol. <mailto:CorrPro96%40aol.com> com wrote: >> >>> I have to disagree. >>> Photography has always been about the craft first, the art second >>> and the >> >>> technical in terms of feasibility... whether or not it is possible. >>> Digital has provided the technology that has enabled the craft >>> and the art >>> >>> to reach into areas beyond photography, using the photographic >>> processes. >>> >>> Richard Massie >>> >>> >>> In a message dated 2/10/2008 1:58:37 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, >>> nemophoto@earthlink <mailto:nemophoto%40earthlink.net> .net writes: >>> >>> . Photography >>> has always been about the technical, we just never called it that, >>> because computers weren't involved. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> **************Biggest Grammy Award surprises of all time on AOL >>> Music. >> >>> (http://music. <http://music.aol.com/grammys/pictures/never-won-a-grammy?> aol.com/grammys/pictures/never-won-a-grammy? >>> NCID=aolcmp003000 >> 000025 >>> 48) >>> >>> >>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >>> >>> >>> >>> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other >>> resources as >>> they are often being updated. >>> >>> http://groups. <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint> yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint >>> >>> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you >>> wish to >>> unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting >>> this same >>> page. >>> >>> Please follow these basic guidelines: >>> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier >>> messages to keep >>> them short. >>> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or >>> flames. >>> Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the >>> membership without notice. >>> - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of >>> digital B&W >>> printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be >>> removed from >>> the membership. >>> - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and >>> guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the >>> group Owner >>> and Moderators. See Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines in the Files >>> section: >>> http://groups. <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/> yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ >>> >>> BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, >>> THE PRINT >>> YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE OWNER AND >>> MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE >>> LIABLE TO >>> YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR >>> EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF >>> PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE >>> OWNER AND MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP >>> HAVE BEEN >>> ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) >>> THE USE >>> OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) >>> UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR >>> DATA; (iii) >>> STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE >>> PRINT >>> YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, >>> THE >>> PRINT YAHOO GROUP. >>> >>> Yahoo! Groups Links >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other >> resources as >> they are often being updated. >> >> http://groups. <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint> yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint >> >> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you >> wish to >> unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting >> this same >> page. >> >> Please follow these basic guidelines: >> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages >> to keep >> them short. >> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or >> flames. >> Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the >> membership without notice. >> - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of >> digital B&W >> printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be >> removed from >> the membership. >> - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and >> guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group >> Owner >> and >> Moderators. See Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines in the Files >> section: >> http://groups. <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/> yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ >> >> BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE >> PRINT >> YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE OWNER AND >> MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE >> LIABLE TO >> YOU >> FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR >> EXEMPLARY >> DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, >> GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE >> OWNER AND >> MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN >> ADVISED OF THE >> POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE >> INABILITY >> TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED >> ACCESS TO >> OR >> ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR >> CONDUCT OF >> ANY >> THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY >> OTHER >> MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP. >> >> Yahoo! Groups Links >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other >> resources as >> they are often being updated. >> >> http://groups. <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint> yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint >> >> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you >> wish to >> unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting >> this same >> page. >> >> Please follow these basic guidelines: >> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages >> to keep >> them short. >> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or >> flames. >> Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the >> membership without notice. >> - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of >> digital B&W >> printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be >> removed from >> the membership. >> - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and >> guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group >> Owner >> and Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the Files >> section: >> http://groups. <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/> yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ >> >> BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE >> PRINT >> YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER" AND >> "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE >> LIABLE TO >> YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR >> EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF >> PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE >> "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE >> BEEN >> ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) >> THE USE >> OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) >> UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR >> DATA; (iii) >> STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT >> YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE >> PRINT YAHOO GROUP. >> >> Yahoo! Groups Links >> >> >> > > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other > resources as they are often being updated. > > http://groups. <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint> yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you > wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by > visiting this same page. > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages > to keep them short. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or > flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed > from the membership without notice. > - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital > B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be > removed from the membership. > - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules > and guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the > group Owner and Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" > in the Files section: > http://groups. <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/> yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > > BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE > PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE " > OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL > NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, > CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, > DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER > INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL > BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF > SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE > THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO > OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR > CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO > GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE > PRINT YAHOO GROUP. > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2008-02-11 by Steve Kale
This same topic comes up with about the same level of repetition. I agree with the statement that printing is a craft (but that wasn't the original comment that sparked the conversation). This list then is about craft not art and hence intricately entwined with conversations about technique, equipment and materials. However, I still refute the notion that having a good understanding of these items is a basic need of an artist. You can't make a photo (to outsource a print) if you can't operate your camera. If you want end- to-end control over the expression of your vision, and you intend to exhibit a print, then understanding printing techniques, equipment and materials is beneficial also. On 11 Feb 2008, at 00:34, Robert W Shearer wrote: > Yes, the best analysis so far. This seems to be a bit of a touchy > subject. > This looks like a new addition to the Windows/Apple, Nikon/Canon, > Life v > Death hardcore issues. Did not know that I was going there! > > -----Original Message----- > From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of > Gary > Weaver > Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2008 6:59 PM > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: Epson Exhibition Fiber - A Review > > I half disagree. Printing is a craft. Creating the image is the art. > > gar > > *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** > > On 2/10/08 at 2:10 PM CorrPro96@... wrote: > > >I have to disagree. > >Photography has always been about the craft first, the art second > and the > >technical in terms of feasibility... whether or not it is possible. > >Digital has provided the technology that has enabled the craft and > the art > > > >to reach into areas beyond photography, using the photographic > processes. > > > >Richard Massie > > > > > >In a message dated 2/10/2008 1:58:37 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, > >nemophoto@... writes: > > > >. Photography > >has always been about the technical, we just never called it that, > >because computers weren't involved. > > > > > > > > > > > >**************Biggest Grammy Award surprises of all time on AOL > Music. > >(http://music.aol.com/grammys/pictures/never-won-a-grammy? > NCID=aolcmp003000 > 000025 > >48) > > > > > >[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > >Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other > resources as > >they are often being updated. > > > >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > > >If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you > wish to > >unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting > this same > >page. > > > >Please follow these basic guidelines: > >- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages > to keep > >them short. > >- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or > flames. > >Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the > >membership without notice. > >- Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of > digital B&W > >printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be > removed from > >the membership. > >- By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and > >guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group > Owner > >and Moderators. See Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines in the Files > >section: > >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > > > >BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE > PRINT > >YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE OWNER AND > >MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE > LIABLE TO > >YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR > >EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF > >PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE > >OWNER AND MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE > BEEN > >ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) > THE USE > >OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) > >UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR > DATA; (iii) > >STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT > >YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE > >PRINT YAHOO GROUP. > > > >Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other > resources as > they are often being updated. > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you > wish to > unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting > this same > page. > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages > to keep > them short. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or > flames. > Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the > membership without notice. > - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital > B&W > printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be > removed from > the membership. > - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and > guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group > Owner and > Moderators. See Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines in the Files > section: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > > BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE > PRINT > YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE OWNER AND > MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE > LIABLE TO YOU > FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR > EXEMPLARY > DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, > GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE OWNER > AND > MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED > OF THE > POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE > INABILITY > TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED > ACCESS TO OR > ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR > CONDUCT OF ANY > THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY > OTHER > MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP. > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2008-02-11 by Steve Kale
I meant "not having"
On 11 Feb 2008, at 06:47, Steve Kale wrote: > This same topic comes up with about the same level of repetition. I > agree with the statement that printing is a craft (but that wasn't > the original comment that sparked the conversation). This list then > is about craft not art and hence intricately entwined with > conversations about technique, equipment and materials. However, I > still refute the notion that having a good understanding of these > items is a basic need of an artist. You can't make a photo (to > outsource a print) if you can't operate your camera. If you want end- > to-end control over the expression of your vision, and you intend to > exhibit a print, then understanding printing techniques, equipment > and materials is beneficial also. > > > On 11 Feb 2008, at 00:34, Robert W Shearer wrote: > >> Yes, the best analysis so far. This seems to be a bit of a touchy >> subject. >> This looks like a new addition to the Windows/Apple, Nikon/Canon, >> Life v >> Death hardcore issues. Did not know that I was going there! >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com >> [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of >> Gary >> Weaver >> Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2008 6:59 PM >> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com >> Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: Epson Exhibition Fiber - A Review >> >> I half disagree. Printing is a craft. Creating the image is the art. >> >> gar >> >> *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** >> >> On 2/10/08 at 2:10 PM CorrPro96@... wrote: >> >>> I have to disagree. >>> Photography has always been about the craft first, the art second >> and the >>> technical in terms of feasibility... whether or not it is possible. >>> Digital has provided the technology that has enabled the craft and >> the art >>> >>> to reach into areas beyond photography, using the photographic >> processes. >>> >>> Richard Massie >>> >>> >>> In a message dated 2/10/2008 1:58:37 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, >>> nemophoto@... writes: >>> >>> . Photography >>> has always been about the technical, we just never called it that, >>> because computers weren't involved. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> **************Biggest Grammy Award surprises of all time on AOL >> Music. >>> (http://music.aol.com/grammys/pictures/never-won-a-grammy? >> NCID=aolcmp003000 >> 000025 >>> 48) >>> >>> >>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >>> >>> >>> >>> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other >> resources as >>> they are often being updated. >>> >>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint >>> >>> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you >> wish to >>> unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting >> this same >>> page. >>> >>> Please follow these basic guidelines: >>> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages >> to keep >>> them short. >>> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or >> flames. >>> Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the >>> membership without notice. >>> - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of >> digital B&W >>> printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be >> removed from >>> the membership. >>> - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and >>> guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group >> Owner >>> and Moderators. See Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines in the Files >>> section: >>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ >>> >>> BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE >> PRINT >>> YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE OWNER AND >>> MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE >> LIABLE TO >>> YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR >>> EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF >>> PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE >>> OWNER AND MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE >> BEEN >>> ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) >> THE USE >>> OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) >>> UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR >> DATA; (iii) >>> STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE >>> PRINT >>> YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, >>> THE >>> PRINT YAHOO GROUP. >>> >>> Yahoo! Groups Links >>> >>> >>> >> >> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other >> resources as >> they are often being updated. >> >> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint >> >> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you >> wish to >> unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting >> this same >> page. >> >> Please follow these basic guidelines: >> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages >> to keep >> them short. >> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or >> flames. >> Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the >> membership without notice. >> - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital >> B&W >> printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be >> removed from >> the membership. >> - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and >> guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group >> Owner and >> Moderators. See Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines in the Files >> section: >> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ >> >> BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE >> PRINT >> YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE OWNER AND >> MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE >> LIABLE TO YOU >> FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR >> EXEMPLARY >> DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, >> GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE OWNER >> AND >> MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED >> OF THE >> POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE >> INABILITY >> TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED >> ACCESS TO OR >> ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR >> CONDUCT OF ANY >> THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY >> OTHER >> MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP. >> >> Yahoo! Groups Links >> >> >> > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other > resources as they are often being updated. > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you > wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by > visiting this same page. > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages > to keep them short. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or > flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed > from the membership without notice. > - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital > B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be > removed from the membership. > - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules > and guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the > group Owner and Moderators. See Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines > in the Files section: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > > BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE > PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE > OWNER AND MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL > NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, > CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, > DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER > INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE OWNER AND MODERATORS OF DIGITAL > BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF > SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE > THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO > OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR > CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO > GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE > PRINT YAHOO GROUP. > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > >
2008-02-11 by ncmphoto
Posted by: "Gary Weaver" garww@... garww Sun Feb 10, 2008 4:55 pm (PST) "...The Scribe was a craftsman, and sure, art could play a part. But in all printing, it's always been a craft. The primary effort is to reproduce faithfully and art has nothing to do with that." Yes, printing has always been a craft, but I don't agree that art has nothing to do with it, especially if you're printing your own images. Printing is also interpretation. There are many ways to print the same negative. Who was it, using a musical metaphor, who said that the negative is the score and the print is the performance?
2008-02-11 by Mitch Greenwald
> Who was it, using a musical metaphor, who said that the > negative is the score and the print is the performance? I believe it was Ansel Adams who said that. Equally true with processing a RAW image, all the more so to a finished print.
On Feb 11, 2008, at 6:11 AM, ncmphoto wrote: > Who was it, using a musical metaphor, who said that the > negative is the score and the print is the performance?
2008-02-11 by Scott Jones
Would it be too much trouble for the participants in this thread to change the name of the thread to something else and mark it OT? I keep looking for information on Epson Exhibition paper but keep finding this discussion about something else entirely. Thanks.
2008-02-11 by scott_now_coming
> I keep looking for information on Epson Exhibition paper but keep > finding this discussion about something else entirely. > > Thanks. Hi Scott, I'm glad you found the article useful. I post that link because I thought people would be interested in this new paper and what a few people who have used it (and tested it) had to say. Boy was I wrong! 99.9999% non-sense. I'd think peple would just move on if the article didn't interest them. Instead, they spend their energy flaming and complaining. Must to nice to have that much time on your hands. Glad you found that article useful. :>) Another Scott :>)
2008-02-11 by Tyler Boley
--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "scott_now_coming" <scott_now_coming@...> wrote: > > > I keep looking for information on Epson Exhibition paper but keep > > finding this discussion about something else entirely. > > > > Thanks. > > Hi Scott, > > I'm glad you found the article useful. I post that link because I > thought people would be interested in this new paper and what a few > people who have used it (and tested it) had to say. > > Boy was I wrong!... Apologies for participation in the thread's demise. My somewhat sarcastic point was that I think you will find this group in fact more up to date, demanding, and opinions more discerning than the LL forum when it comes to materials. The LL is a useful forum, though, for other reasons. If you search this group for that paper name, and the Innova version of it (long out before the Epson thicker version) you will find a lot of informed commentary about the paper. Of course, the more opinions the better, thanks for your post. I was attempting to make a backhanded compliment to this group. That review pointed out how ahead of the games things tend to be, a disturbingly demanding mob hangs here. Again, my apologies, thanks for the link. Tyler
2008-02-11 by Tyler Boley
http://www.shadesofpaper.com/product_info.php?cPath=30&products_id=154 --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Gabriel Valansi <gvalansi@...> wrote: > > I need a print paper with the same characteristics for the Epson EF, but in > 44² roll. I made test with the Ilford and hahnemuhle baryta papers And I´m > soooo disappointed. somebody knows if Epson plan to make the same EF paper > in bigger sizes?, or any possible replacement? > > Thanks > > El 11/2/08 14:19, "scott_now_coming" <scott_now_coming@...> escribió: > > > > > > > > > > >> > I keep looking for information on Epson Exhibition paper but keep > >> > finding this discussion about something else entirely. > >> > > >> > Thanks. > > > > Hi Scott, > > > > I'm glad you found the article useful. I post that link because I > > thought people would be interested in this new paper and what a few > > people who have used it (and tested it) had to say. > > > > Boy was I wrong! 99.9999% non-sense. I'd think peple would just move on
> > if the article didn't interest them. Instead, they spend their energy > > flaming and complaining. Must to nice to have that much time on your > > hands. > > > > Glad you found that article useful. :>) > > > > Another Scott :>) > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
2008-02-11 by Tyler Boley
The Epson is this, on a thicker base. Exactly. Epson does not make paper. Yes, lots of experience. If you search this list you'll find a great deal of info about it. T --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Gabriel Valansi <gvalansi@...> wrote: > > Hey Tyler, Thanks! > What about this Innova? Do you have any experiene with this paper? > > > El 11/2/08 15:03, "Tyler Boley" <tyler@...> escribió: > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.shadesofpaper.com/product_info.php?cPath=30&products_id=154 > > <http://www.shadesofpaper.com/product_info.php?cPath=30&products_id=154> > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > > <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> , Gabriel Valansi > > <gvalansi@> wrote: > >> > > >> > I need a print paper with the same characteristics for the Epson > > EF, but in > >> > 44² roll. I made test with the Ilford and hahnemuhle baryta papers > > And I´m > >> > soooo disappointed. somebody knows if Epson plan to make the same EF > > paper > >> > in bigger sizes?, or any possible replacement? > >> > > >> > Thanks > >> > > >> > El 11/2/08 14:19, "scott_now_coming" <scott_now_coming@> escribió: > >> > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>>>> > >> > I keep looking for information on Epson Exhibition paper but keep > >>>>> > >> > finding this discussion about something else entirely. > >>>>> > >> > > >>>>> > >> > Thanks. > >>> > > > >>> > > Hi Scott, > >>> > > > >>> > > I'm glad you found the article useful. I post that link because I > >>> > > thought people would be interested in this new paper and what a few > >>> > > people who have used it (and tested it) had to say. > >>> > > > >>> > > Boy was I wrong! 99.9999% non-sense. I'd think peple would just > > move on > >>> > > if the article didn't interest them. Instead, they spend their energy > >>> > > flaming and complaining. Must to nice to have that much time on your
> >>> > > hands. > >>> > > > >>> > > Glad you found that article useful. :>) > >>> > > > >>> > > Another Scott :>) > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
2008-02-11 by Gabriel Valansi
I need a print paper with the same characteristics for the Epson EF, but in 44² roll. I made test with the Ilford and hahnemuhle baryta papers And I´m soooo disappointed. somebody knows if Epson plan to make the same EF paper in bigger sizes?, or any possible replacement? Thanks El 11/2/08 14:19, "scott_now_coming" <scott_now_coming@...> escribió: > > > > >> > I keep looking for information on Epson Exhibition paper but keep >> > finding this discussion about something else entirely. >> > >> > Thanks. > > Hi Scott, > > I'm glad you found the article useful. I post that link because I > thought people would be interested in this new paper and what a few > people who have used it (and tested it) had to say. > > Boy was I wrong! 99.9999% non-sense. I'd think peple would just move on > if the article didn't interest them. Instead, they spend their energy > flaming and complaining. Must to nice to have that much time on your > hands. > > Glad you found that article useful. :>) > > Another Scott :>) > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2008-02-11 by Frank Jay
can the subject heading be changed please when the post has nothing to do with the stated subject. I am trying to find inf. on the Epson Exhibtion paper, did a search and am wading thru all these posts on the diverse philosophies of printing, art,photography, digital etc etc.
thanks
Frank
"The luckiest dogs are those with clipped tails....they're the ones who won't be chasing their own arses."
---------------------------------
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]2008-02-11 by Gary Weaver
Ya, I fogot printing was a performance art : ) gar *********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 2/11/08 at 11:11 AM ncmphoto wrote: >Posted by: "Gary Weaver" garww@... garww >Sun Feb 10, 2008 4:55 pm (PST) > >"...The Scribe was a craftsman, and sure, art could play a part. But in >all printing, it's always >been a craft. The primary effort is to reproduce faithfully and art has >nothing to do with that." > >Yes, printing has always been a craft, but I don't agree that art has >nothing to do with it, >especially if you're printing your own images. Printing is also >interpretation. There are many >ways to print the same negative. Who was it, using a musical metaphor, who >said that the >negative is the score and the print is the performance? > > > >Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as >they are often being updated. > >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > >If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to >unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same >page. > >Please follow these basic guidelines: >- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep >them short. >- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. >Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the >membership without notice. >- Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W >printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from >the membership. >- By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and >guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner >and Moderators. See Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines in the Files >section: >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > >BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT >YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE OWNER AND >MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO >YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR >EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF >PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE >OWNER AND MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN >ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE >OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) >UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) >STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT >YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE >PRINT YAHOO GROUP. > >Yahoo! Groups Links > > >
2008-02-11 by Gabriel Valansi
Hey Tyler, Thanks! What about this Innova? Do you have any experiene with this paper? El 11/2/08 15:03, "Tyler Boley" <tyler@...> escribió: > > > > > http://www.shadesofpaper.com/product_info.php?cPath=30&products_id=154 > <http://www.shadesofpaper.com/product_info.php?cPath=30&products_id=154> > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> , Gabriel Valansi > <gvalansi@...> wrote: >> > >> > I need a print paper with the same characteristics for the Epson > EF, but in >> > 44² roll. I made test with the Ilford and hahnemuhle baryta papers > And I´m >> > soooo disappointed. somebody knows if Epson plan to make the same EF > paper >> > in bigger sizes?, or any possible replacement? >> > >> > Thanks >> > >> > El 11/2/08 14:19, "scott_now_coming" <scott_now_coming@...> escribió: >> > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>>> > >> > I keep looking for information on Epson Exhibition paper but keep >>>>> > >> > finding this discussion about something else entirely. >>>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> > Thanks. >>> > > >>> > > Hi Scott, >>> > > >>> > > I'm glad you found the article useful. I post that link because I >>> > > thought people would be interested in this new paper and what a few >>> > > people who have used it (and tested it) had to say. >>> > > >>> > > Boy was I wrong! 99.9999% non-sense. I'd think peple would just > move on >>> > > if the article didn't interest them. Instead, they spend their energy >>> > > flaming and complaining. Must to nice to have that much time on your >>> > > hands. >>> > > >>> > > Glad you found that article useful. :>) >>> > > >>> > > Another Scott :>) >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >> > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2008-02-11 by Tyler Boley
photo black with the Epson inks. Tyler --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Gabriel Valansi <gvalansi@...> wrote: > > Tyler: do you print the innova with photo black inks or the photo matte > ones? > > > El 11/2/08 15:42, "Tyler Boley" <tyler@...> escribió: > > > > > > > > > > > The Epson is this, on a thicker base. Exactly. > > Epson does not make paper. > > > > Yes, lots of experience. If you search this list you'll find a great > > deal of info about it. > > T > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > > <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> , Gabriel Valansi > > <gvalansi@> wrote: > >> > > >> > Hey Tyler, Thanks! > >> > What about this Innova? Do you have any experiene with this paper? > >> > > >> > > >> > El 11/2/08 15:03, "Tyler Boley" <tyler@> escribió: > >> > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > http://www.shadesofpaper.com/product_info.php?cPath=30&products_id=154 > >>> <http://www.shadesofpaper.com/product_info.php?cPath=30&products_id=154> > >>> > > > > <http://www.shadesofpaper.com/product_info.php?cPath=30&products_id=154 > > <http://www.shadesofpaper.com/product_info.php?cPath=30&products_id=15 > > 4> <http://www.shadesofpaper.com/product_info.php?cPath=30&products_id=154 > > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > >>> <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> > >>> > > <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> , Gabriel > > Valansi > >>> > > <gvalansi@> wrote: > >>>>> > >> > > >>>>> > >> > I need a print paper with the same characteristics for the Epson > >>> > > EF, but in > >>>>> > >> > 44ò roll. I made test with the Ilford and hahnemuhle baryta papers > >>> > > And Iôm > >>>>> > >> > soooo disappointed. somebody knows if Epson plan to make the > > same EF > >>> > > paper > >>>>> > >> > in bigger sizes?, or any possible replacement? > >>>>> > >> > > >>>>> > >> > Thanks > >>>>> > >> > > >>>>> > >> > El 11/2/08 14:19, "scott_now_coming" <scott_now_coming@> escribió: > >>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> > >>> > > > >>>>>>> > >>> > > > >>>>>>> > >>> > > > >>>>>>> > >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >> > I keep looking for information on Epson Exhibition > > paper but keep > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >> > finding this discussion about something else > entirely. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >> > Thanks. > >>>>>>> > >>> > > > >>>>>>> > >>> > > Hi Scott, > >>>>>>> > >>> > > > >>>>>>> > >>> > > I'm glad you found the article useful. I post that link > > because I > >>>>>>> > >>> > > thought people would be interested in this new paper and > > what a few > >>>>>>> > >>> > > people who have used it (and tested it) had to say. > >>>>>>> > >>> > > > >>>>>>> > >>> > > Boy was I wrong! 99.9999% non-sense. I'd think peple would > just > >>> > > move on > >>>>>>> > >>> > > if the article didn't interest them. Instead, they spend > > their energy > >>>>>>> > >>> > > flaming and complaining. Must to nice to have that much time
> > on your > >>>>>>> > >>> > > hands. > >>>>>>> > >>> > > > >>>>>>> > >>> > > Glad you found that article useful. :>) > >>>>>>> > >>> > > > >>>>>>> > >>> > > Another Scott :>) > >>>>>>> > >>> > > > >>>>>>> > >>> > > > >>>>>>> > >>> > > > >>>>> > >> > > >>>>> > >> > > >>>>> > >> > > >>>>> > >> > > >>>>> > >> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > >>>>> > >> > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
2008-02-11 by Gabriel Valansi
Thx again, Tyler. A big help. G. El 11/2/08 15:42, "Tyler Boley" <tyler@tylerboley.com> escribió: > > > > > The Epson is this, on a thicker base. Exactly. > Epson does not make paper. > > Yes, lots of experience. If you search this list you'll find a great > deal of info about it. > T > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> , Gabriel Valansi > <gvalansi@...> wrote: >> > >> > Hey Tyler, Thanks! >> > What about this Innova? Do you have any experiene with this paper? >> > >> > >> > El 11/2/08 15:03, "Tyler Boley" <tyler@...> escribió: >> > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > http://www.shadesofpaper.com/product_info.php?cPath=30&products_id=154 >>> <http://www.shadesofpaper.com/product_info.php?cPath=30&products_id=154> >>> > > > <http://www.shadesofpaper.com/product_info.php?cPath=30&products_id=154 > <http://www.shadesofpaper.com/product_info.php?cPath=30&products_id=15 > 4> <http://www.shadesofpaper.com/product_info.php?cPath=30&products_id=154 > > > >>> > > >>> > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com >>> <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> >>> > > <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> , Gabriel > Valansi >>> > > <gvalansi@> wrote: >>>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> > I need a print paper with the same characteristics for the Epson >>> > > EF, but in >>>>> > >> > 44² roll. I made test with the Ilford and hahnemuhle baryta papers >>> > > And I´m >>>>> > >> > soooo disappointed. somebody knows if Epson plan to make the > same EF >>> > > paper >>>>> > >> > in bigger sizes?, or any possible replacement? >>>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> > Thanks >>>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> > El 11/2/08 14:19, "scott_now_coming" <scott_now_coming@> escribió: >>>>> > >> > >>>>>>> > >>> > > >>>>>>> > >>> > > >>>>>>> > >>> > > >>>>>>> > >>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >> > I keep looking for information on Epson Exhibition > paper but keep >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >> > finding this discussion about something else entirely. >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >> > Thanks. >>>>>>> > >>> > > >>>>>>> > >>> > > Hi Scott, >>>>>>> > >>> > > >>>>>>> > >>> > > I'm glad you found the article useful. I post that link > because I >>>>>>> > >>> > > thought people would be interested in this new paper and > what a few >>>>>>> > >>> > > people who have used it (and tested it) had to say. >>>>>>> > >>> > > >>>>>>> > >>> > > Boy was I wrong! 99.9999% non-sense. I'd think peple would just >>> > > move on >>>>>>> > >>> > > if the article didn't interest them. Instead, they spend > their energy >>>>>>> > >>> > > flaming and complaining. Must to nice to have that much time > on your >>>>>>> > >>> > > hands. >>>>>>> > >>> > > >>>>>>> > >>> > > Glad you found that article useful. :>) >>>>>>> > >>> > > >>>>>>> > >>> > > Another Scott :>) >>>>>>> > >>> > > >>>>>>> > >>> > > >>>>>>> > >>> > > >>>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >>>>> > >> > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >> > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2008-02-11 by Scott Jones
Aproximately the same price as at Atlex also ( for EEF that is) One question though. Why is the 17" sheet in the dimesion of 17x22? A dSLR aspect ration image would size out to 16x24 which will not make it onto this sheet. Are all 17" papers this short??? http://www.scottjonesphoto.com
2008-02-11 by Gabriel Valansi
Tyler: do you print the innova with photo black inks or the photo matte ones? El 11/2/08 15:42, "Tyler Boley" <tyler@...> escribió: > > > > > The Epson is this, on a thicker base. Exactly. > Epson does not make paper. > > Yes, lots of experience. If you search this list you'll find a great > deal of info about it. > T > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> , Gabriel Valansi > <gvalansi@...> wrote: >> > >> > Hey Tyler, Thanks! >> > What about this Innova? Do you have any experiene with this paper? >> > >> > >> > El 11/2/08 15:03, "Tyler Boley" <tyler@...> escribió: >> > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > http://www.shadesofpaper.com/product_info.php?cPath=30&products_id=154 >>> <http://www.shadesofpaper.com/product_info.php?cPath=30&products_id=154> >>> > > > <http://www.shadesofpaper.com/product_info.php?cPath=30&products_id=154 > <http://www.shadesofpaper.com/product_info.php?cPath=30&products_id=15 > 4> <http://www.shadesofpaper.com/product_info.php?cPath=30&products_id=154 > > > >>> > > >>> > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com >>> <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> >>> > > <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> , Gabriel > Valansi >>> > > <gvalansi@> wrote: >>>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> > I need a print paper with the same characteristics for the Epson >>> > > EF, but in >>>>> > >> > 44² roll. I made test with the Ilford and hahnemuhle baryta papers >>> > > And I´m >>>>> > >> > soooo disappointed. somebody knows if Epson plan to make the > same EF >>> > > paper >>>>> > >> > in bigger sizes?, or any possible replacement? >>>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> > Thanks >>>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> > El 11/2/08 14:19, "scott_now_coming" <scott_now_coming@> escribió: >>>>> > >> > >>>>>>> > >>> > > >>>>>>> > >>> > > >>>>>>> > >>> > > >>>>>>> > >>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >> > I keep looking for information on Epson Exhibition > paper but keep >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >> > finding this discussion about something else entirely. >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >> > Thanks. >>>>>>> > >>> > > >>>>>>> > >>> > > Hi Scott, >>>>>>> > >>> > > >>>>>>> > >>> > > I'm glad you found the article useful. I post that link > because I >>>>>>> > >>> > > thought people would be interested in this new paper and > what a few >>>>>>> > >>> > > people who have used it (and tested it) had to say. >>>>>>> > >>> > > >>>>>>> > >>> > > Boy was I wrong! 99.9999% non-sense. I'd think peple would just >>> > > move on >>>>>>> > >>> > > if the article didn't interest them. Instead, they spend > their energy >>>>>>> > >>> > > flaming and complaining. Must to nice to have that much time > on your >>>>>>> > >>> > > hands. >>>>>>> > >>> > > >>>>>>> > >>> > > Glad you found that article useful. :>) >>>>>>> > >>> > > >>>>>>> > >>> > > Another Scott :>) >>>>>>> > >>> > > >>>>>>> > >>> > > >>>>>>> > >>> > > >>>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >>>>> > >> > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >> > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2008-02-11 by Gabriel Valansi
Thx! El 11/2/08 17:37, "Tyler Boley" <tyler@...> escribió: > > > > > photo black with the Epson inks. > Tyler > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> , Gabriel Valansi > <gvalansi@...> wrote: >> > >> > Tyler: do you print the innova with photo black inks or the photo matte >> > ones? >> > >> > >> > El 11/2/08 15:42, "Tyler Boley" <tyler@...> escribió: >> > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > The Epson is this, on a thicker base. Exactly. >>> > > Epson does not make paper. >>> > > >>> > > Yes, lots of experience. If you search this list you'll find a great >>> > > deal of info about it. >>> > > T >>> > > >>> > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com >>> <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> >>> > > <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> , Gabriel > Valansi >>> > > <gvalansi@> wrote: >>>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> > Hey Tyler, Thanks! >>>>> > >> > What about this Innova? Do you have any experiene with this paper? >>>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> > El 11/2/08 15:03, "Tyler Boley" <tyler@> escribió: >>>>> > >> > >>>>>>> > >>> > > >>>>>>> > >>> > > >>>>>>> > >>> > > >>>>>>> > >>> > > >>>>>>> > >>> > > > http://www.shadesofpaper.com/product_info.php?cPath=30&products_id=154 > <http://www.shadesofpaper.com/product_info.php?cPath=30&products_id=154> >>>>> > >>> > <http://www.shadesofpaper.com/product_info.php?cPath=30&products_id=154 > <http://www.shadesofpaper.com/product_info.php?cPath=30&products_id=15 > 4> <http://www.shadesofpaper.com/product_info.php?cPath=30&products_id=154 > > > >>>>>>> > >>> > > >>> > > > <http://www.shadesofpaper.com/product_info.php?cPath=30&products_id=154 > <http://www.shadesofpaper.com/product_info.php?cPath=30&products_id=15 > 4> <http://www.shadesofpaper.com/product_info.php?cPath=30&products_id=154 > > >>> > > > <http://www.shadesofpaper.com/product_info.php?cPath=30&products_id=15 > <http://www.shadesofpaper.com/product_info.php?cPath=30&amp;products_i > d=15> > <http://www.shadesofpaper.com/product_info.php?cPath=30&products_id=15 > > >>> > > 4> > <http://www.shadesofpaper.com/product_info.php?cPath=30&products_id=154 > <http://www.shadesofpaper.com/product_info.php?cPath=30&products_id=15 > 4> <http://www.shadesofpaper.com/product_info.php?cPath=30&products_id=154 > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> > >>> > > >>>>>>> > >>> > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com >>>>>>> <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> >>>>> > >>> <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> >>>>>>> > >>> > > <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> , > Gabriel >>> > > Valansi >>>>>>> > >>> > > <gvalansi@> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >> > I need a print paper with the same characteristics for > the Epson >>>>>>> > >>> > > EF, but in >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >> > 44² roll. I made test with the Ilford and hahnemuhle > baryta papers >>>>>>> > >>> > > And I´m >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >> > soooo disappointed. somebody knows if Epson plan to > make the >>> > > same EF >>>>>>> > >>> > > paper >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >> > in bigger sizes?, or any possible replacement? >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >> > Thanks >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >> > El 11/2/08 14:19, "scott_now_coming" > <scott_now_coming@> escribió: >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >> > I keep looking for information on Epson > Exhibition >>> > > paper but keep >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >> > finding this discussion about something else >> > entirely. >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >> > Thanks. >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>> > > Hi Scott, >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>> > > I'm glad you found the article useful. I post that > link >>> > > because I >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>> > > thought people would be interested in this new > paper and >>> > > what a few >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>> > > people who have used it (and tested it) had to say. >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>> > > Boy was I wrong! 99.9999% non-sense. I'd think > peple would >> > just >>>>>>> > >>> > > move on >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>> > > if the article didn't interest them. Instead, they > spend >>> > > their energy >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>> > > flaming and complaining. Must to nice to have that > much time >>> > > on your >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>> > > hands. >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>> > > Glad you found that article useful. :>) >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>> > > Another Scott :>) >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >> > >>>>>>> > >>> > > >>>>>>> > >>> > > >>>>>>> > >>> > > >>>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >>>>> > >> > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >> > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2008-02-12 by pglombick
"I made test with the Ilford and hahnemuhle baryta papers And I´m soooo disappointed. somebody knows if Epson plan to make the same EF paper in bigger sizes?, or any possible replacement?" ---------------------------------------------------- I'm interested in why you are disasppointed in the HM Baryta. I have tried it and Epson EFP paper and found them to be pretty similar overall. The HM Baryta has a slightly higher sheen under direct light that can be distracting from certain angles and slightly more texture, but I found the dmax, sharpness, and shadow highlights to be pretty similar. Perhaps we are looking for different things. The Epson is pretty bright overall (which I like), but both are definitely not what I would call warm papers. The cost of the Epson EFP is pretty prohibitive. For that price, it had better be a wonder paper. I had yet to try Harmon gloss and some of the lower-priced alternatives.
2008-02-12 by Gary Weaver
The size is for 16x20 prints - the standard since I was born. gar *********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 2/11/08 at 9:09 PM Scott Jones wrote: >Aproximately the same price as at Atlex also ( for EEF that is) > >One question though. Why is the 17" sheet in the dimesion of 17x22? > >A dSLR aspect ration image would size out to 16x24 which will not make >it onto this sheet. Are all 17" papers this short??? > >http://www.scottjonesphoto.com > > > >Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as >they are often being updated. > >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > >If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to >unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same >page. > >Please follow these basic guidelines: >- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep >them short. >- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. >Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the >membership without notice. >- Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W >printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from >the membership. >- By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and >guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner >and Moderators. See Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines in the Files >section: >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > >BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT >YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE OWNER AND >MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO >YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR >EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF >PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE >OWNER AND MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN >ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE >OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) >UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) >STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT >YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE >PRINT YAHOO GROUP. > >Yahoo! Groups Links > > >
2008-02-12 by Scott Jones
I started looking around after posting this size question and was surprised to see that the Harman paper actually comes in a 17x25 sheets. Perfect for a 16x24 print. Interesting. Perhaps this feature will encoiurage me to use this paper. I just got a 15 sheet pack and will be testing it...... http://www.scottjonesphoto.com --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Gary Weaver" <garww@...> wrote: > > The size is for 16x20 prints - the standard since I was born. > > gar > > *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** > > On 2/11/08 at 9:09 PM Scott Jones wrote: > > >Aproximately the same price as at Atlex also ( for EEF that is) > > > >One question though. Why is the 17" sheet in the dimesion of 17x22? > > > >A dSLR aspect ration image would size out to 16x24 which will not make
> >it onto this sheet. Are all 17" papers this short??? > > > >http://www.scottjonesphoto.com
2008-02-12 by Gary Weaver
Hi Scott, They do try and make sizes that will sell. I don't envey the choices the paper MFGs have to make. gar *********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 2/12/08 at 2:31 AM Scott Jones wrote: >I started looking around after posting this size question and was >surprised to see that the Harman paper actually comes in a 17x25 >sheets. Perfect for a 16x24 print. Interesting. Perhaps this feature >will encoiurage me to use this paper. I just got a 15 sheet pack and >will be testing it...... > >http://www.scottjonesphoto.com > >--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Gary Weaver" ><garww@...> wrote: >> >> The size is for 16x20 prints - the standard since I was born. >> >> gar >> >> *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** >> >> On 2/11/08 at 9:09 PM Scott Jones wrote: >> >> >Aproximately the same price as at Atlex also ( for EEF that is) >> > >> >One question though. Why is the 17" sheet in the dimesion of 17x22? >> > >> >A dSLR aspect ration image would size out to 16x24 which will not >make >> >it onto this sheet. Are all 17" papers this short??? >> > >> >http://www.scottjonesphoto.com > > > > >Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as >they are often being updated. > >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > >If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to >unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same >page. > >Please follow these basic guidelines: >- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep >them short. >- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. >Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the >membership without notice. >- Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W >printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from >the membership. >- By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and >guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner >and Moderators. See Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines in the Files >section: >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > >BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT >YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE OWNER AND >MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO >YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR >EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF >PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE >OWNER AND MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN >ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE >OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) >UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) >STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT >YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE >PRINT YAHOO GROUP. > >Yahoo! Groups Links > > >
2008-02-12 by Gabriel Valansi
I know about the Epson EFP only for the test I saw from people who compare it with others brands at the same Baryta products. I had a beautiful experience with other HM products, like the Photo rag, and my first choice was to order first a small pack of papers for the HM baryta, and the ilford GFS, (because the price and the brand). I use them with my Epson 9880. May be I made a mistake with the profiles (I have the regular Epson list in the Epson printer software available with the printer), but I never get these D-max desirable in a fiber paper. Then I hate the HM texture. It's so visible and ³present² over the image. Both (the Ilford and the HM) feel more like a plastic paper than a good fiber base one. I not found any radical difference between those Fb based papers and the RC ones. Two years ago I made some nice prints in a Oriental Fb. I supposed Ilford And HM should beat the Oriental, but they didn't. The oriental feel more credible and authentic than both them. unfortunately the oriental have a fragile surface. It's very easy to scratch the image. Many people in this an other forums about digital printing tested and compared those papers, and the Epson was a winner. I repeat: may be I made a mistake with the profiles ( sometimes the instinct is not the best way to do the job), but I had a sucesfull experience printing B&W images whit other papers. I´m so interested in your experience with the HM. I´m not happy to pay for the expensive Epson EFP. El 11/2/08 21:08, "pglombick" <glombick@...> escribió: > > > > > "I made test with the Ilford and hahnemuhle baryta papers And I´m soooo > disappointed. somebody knows if Epson plan to make the same EF paper in > bigger sizes?, or any possible replacement?" > > ---------------------------------------------------- > > I'm interested in why you are disasppointed in the HM Baryta. I have > tried it and Epson EFP paper and found them to be pretty similar > overall. The HM Baryta has a slightly higher sheen under direct light > that can be distracting from certain angles and slightly more texture, > but I found the dmax, sharpness, and shadow highlights to be pretty > similar. Perhaps we are looking for different things. The Epson is > pretty bright overall (which I like), but both are definitely not what > I would call warm papers. > > The cost of the Epson EFP is pretty prohibitive. For that price, it had > better be a wonder paper. I had yet to try Harmon gloss and some of the > lower-priced alternatives. > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2008-02-12 by Scott Jones
I know what ya mean. Thanks. --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Gary Weaver" <garww@...> wrote: > > Hi Scott, > > They do try and make sizes that will sell. I don't envey the choices the paper MFGs have to make. > > gar > > *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** > > On 2/12/08 at 2:31 AM Scott Jones wrote: > > >I started looking around after posting this size question and was > >surprised to see that the Harman paper actually comes in a 17x25 > >sheets. Perfect for a 16x24 print. Interesting. Perhaps this feature > >will encoiurage me to use this paper. I just got a 15 sheet pack and > >will be testing it...... > > > >http://www.scottjonesphoto.com > > > >--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Gary Weaver" > ><garww@> wrote: > >> > >> The size is for 16x20 prints - the standard since I was born. > >> > >> gar > >> > >> *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** > >> > >> On 2/11/08 at 9:09 PM Scott Jones wrote: > >> > >> >Aproximately the same price as at Atlex also ( for EEF that is) > >> > > >> >One question though. Why is the 17" sheet in the dimesion of 17x22? > >> > > >> >A dSLR aspect ration image would size out to 16x24 which will not > >make > >> >it onto this sheet. Are all 17" papers this short??? > >> > > >> >http://www.scottjonesphoto.com > > > > > > > > > >Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as > >they are often being updated. > > > >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > > >If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to > >unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same > >page. > > > >Please follow these basic guidelines: > >- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep > >them short. > >- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. > >Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the > >membership without notice. > >- Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W > >printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from > >the membership. > >- By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and > >guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner > >and Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the Files > >section: > >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > > > >BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT > >YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER" AND > >"MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO > >YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR > >EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF > >PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE > >"OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN > >ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE > >OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) > >UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) > >STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT > >YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE
> >PRINT YAHOO GROUP. > > > >Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > >
2008-02-12 by stephengledhill
I understand the 17"x22" size is simply 4 times the area or twice the linear dimensions of the standard 8.5"x11" US letter size paper. The fact that it accommodates a 16"x20" image is coincidental. Almost all of the sheets papers which are 17" wide are 22" long - but there's one exception that I'm aware of (there may well be others) and that's the Harman FB Al which is 25" long. As someone pointed out, making it the ideal aspect ratio of 2:3 35mm film format images printed at 16"x24". Steve Gledhill www.virtuallygrey.co.uk *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** The size is for 16x20 prints - the standard since I was born. gar *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** On 2/11/08 at 9:09 PM Scott Jones wrote: >Aproximately the same price as at Atlex also ( for EEF that is) > >One question though. Why is the 17" sheet in the dimesion of 17x22? > >A dSLR aspect ration image would size out to 16x24 which will not make >it onto this sheet. Are all 17" papers this short??? > >http://www.scottjon <http://www.scottjonesphoto.com/> esphoto.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2008-02-12 by wwodets
Gabriel- I'm with you on the HM Baryta. The whole surface glitters and sparkles under the light, and is particularly bad in high density areas. These look like someone sprayed black vinyl onto the paper. I can't understand why they did this. The Epson EFB has some of this, but much less and is acceptable to me, though not my favorite. The Harman surface (with K3 inks) is a bit glossier than I'd like but the surface is very natural and convincing and the inks are beautiful on it. No glitter at all and not quite a glossy "air-dried," but something very good, convincing and honest in itself. It shows a photograph beautifully. Walt
2008-02-12 by Gary Weaver
I like 35mm and 6x9, but these are a modern aspect. 4x5 is just as important and old Elwood 8x10 enlargers are not totally passe. 16x20 is an important print standard. gar *********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 2/12/08 at 9:19 AM stephengledhill wrote: >I understand the 17"x22" size is simply 4 times the area or twice the >linear >dimensions of the standard 8.5"x11" US letter size paper. The fact that it >accommodates a 16"x20" image is coincidental. > >Almost all of the sheets papers which are 17" wide are 22" long - but >there's one exception that I'm aware of (there may well be others) and >that's the Harman FB Al which is 25" long. As someone pointed out, making >it the ideal aspect ratio of 2:3 35mm film format images printed at >16"x24". > >Steve Gledhill >www.virtuallygrey.co.uk > >*********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** > >The size is for 16x20 prints - the standard since I was born. > >gar > >*********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** > >On 2/11/08 at 9:09 PM Scott Jones wrote: > >>Aproximately the same price as at Atlex also ( for EEF that is) >> >>One question though. Why is the 17" sheet in the dimesion of 17x22? >> >>A dSLR aspect ration image would size out to 16x24 which will not make >>it onto this sheet. Are all 17" papers this short??? >> >>http://www.scottjon <http://www.scottjonesphoto.com/> esphoto.com > > > >[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > >Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as >they are often being updated. > >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > >If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to >unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same >page. > >Please follow these basic guidelines: >- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep >them short. >- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. >Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the >membership without notice. >- Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W >printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from >the membership. >- By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and >guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner >and Moderators. See �Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines� in the Files >section: >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > >BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT >YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE �OWNER� AND >�MODERATORS� OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO >YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR >EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF >PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE >�OWNER� AND �MODERATORS� OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN >ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE >OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) >UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) >STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT >YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE >PRINT YAHOO GROUP. > >Yahoo! Groups Links > > >
2008-02-12 by Carl Schofield
Walt, Very accurate description of the Harman paper. The Harman and Ilford papers each have qualities that I like, but each also have slight detractions that I dislike. I haven't tried either the Epson or HM papers, but it sounds like I'm not missing much with them (particularly price). Carl On Feb 12, 2008, at 4:56 PM, wwodets wrote: > Gabriel- > > I'm with you on the HM Baryta. The whole surface glitters and > sparkles > under the light, and is particularly bad in high density areas. These > look like someone sprayed black vinyl onto the paper. I can't > understand why they did this. The Epson EFB has some of this, but > much > less and is acceptable to me, though not my favorite. The Harman > surface (with K3 inks) is a bit glossier than I'd like but the surface > is very natural and convincing and the inks are beautiful on it. No > glitter at all and not quite a glossy "air-dried," but something very > good, convincing and honest in itself. It shows a photograph > beautifully. > > Walt > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2008-02-13 by Gabriel Valansi
Hey Walt: did you try to print B/W on the Harman in big sizes (beyond 17x22²)? IT is available in rolls? El 12/2/08 18:56, "wwodets" <odets@comcast.net> escribió: > > > > > Gabriel- > > I'm with you on the HM Baryta. The whole surface glitters and sparkles > under the light, and is particularly bad in high density areas. These > look like someone sprayed black vinyl onto the paper. I can't > understand why they did this. The Epson EFB has some of this, but much > less and is acceptable to me, though not my favorite. The Harman > surface (with K3 inks) is a bit glossier than I'd like but the surface > is very natural and convincing and the inks are beautiful on it. No > glitter at all and not quite a glossy "air-dried," but something very > good, convincing and honest in itself. It shows a photograph > beautifully. > > Walt > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2008-02-13 by wwodets
Carl and Gabriel- Carl, What is it you didn't like about the Harman? With the Ilford I found such bad quality control (mostly surface scratching) that I gave up on it. I liked the surface though, because it is smooth and not at all glossy. On the other hand, the gloss differential in highlights was quite obvious because the k3 inks are quite glossy. The gloss differential with the Harman is minimal. Gabriel, I am still awaiting my first box of 17 x 25, and I'm not likely to print larger than that. I was not aware it was available in rolls, but I imagine it would be a curling problem. It has very much the stiffness of a gelatin paper. Walt --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Gabriel Valansi <gvalansi@...> wrote: > > Hey Walt: did you try to print B/W on the Harman in big sizes (beyond > 17x22²)? IT is available in rolls? > > > > El 12/2/08 18:56, "wwodets" <odets@...> escribió: > > > > > > > > > > > Gabriel- > > > > I'm with you on the HM Baryta. The whole surface glitters and sparkles > > under the light, and is particularly bad in high density areas. These > > look like someone sprayed black vinyl onto the paper. I can't > > understand why they did this. The Epson EFB has some of this, but much > > less and is acceptable to me, though not my favorite. The Harman > > surface (with K3 inks) is a bit glossier than I'd like but the surface > > is very natural and convincing and the inks are beautiful on it. No > > glitter at all and not quite a glossy "air-dried," but something very
> > good, convincing and honest in itself. It shows a photograph > > beautifully. > > > > Walt > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
2008-02-13 by Roger
I think when they said HM Baryta they were talking about the Hahnenmuhle paper which is related to the highly speckly Fine Art Pearl. I think the Harmon FB Baryta Al is more like a gloss paper than the other fiber-type ones I've tried. My 8.5x11 sheets also curl a bit after printing. It's quite nice for color but for B&W I still like the Innova White Semi-Matte 300. Roger --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "wwodets" <odets@...> wrote: > > Carl and Gabriel- > > Carl, > > What is it you didn't like about the Harman? With the Ilford I found > such bad quality control (mostly surface scratching) that I gave up > on it. I liked the surface though, because it is smooth and not at > all glossy. On the other hand, the gloss differential in highlights > was quite obvious because the k3 inks are quite glossy. The gloss > differential with the Harman is minimal. > > Gabriel, > > I am still awaiting my first box of 17 x 25, and I'm not likely to > print larger than that. I was not aware it was available in rolls, > but I imagine it would be a curling problem. It has very much the > stiffness of a gelatin paper. > > Walt > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Gabriel Valansi > <gvalansi@> wrote: > > > > Hey Walt: did you try to print B/W on the Harman in big sizes > (beyond > > 17x22²)? IT is available in rolls? > > > > > > > > El 12/2/08 18:56, "wwodets" <odets@> escribiE > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Gabriel- > > > > > > I'm with you on the HM Baryta. The whole surface glitters and > sparkles > > > under the light, and is particularly bad in high density areas. > These > > > look like someone sprayed black vinyl onto the paper. I can't > > > understand why they did this. The Epson EFB has some of this, > but much > > > less and is acceptable to me, though not my favorite. The Harman > > > surface (with K3 inks) is a bit glossier than I'd like but the > surface > > > is very natural and convincing and the inks are beautiful on it. > No > > > glitter at all and not quite a glossy "air-dried," but something
> very > > > good, convincing and honest in itself. It shows a photograph > > > beautifully. > > > > > > Walt > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > >
2008-02-13 by Carl Schofield
Walt, The Harman gloss is more than I would prefer and with larger sheets, the relatively low basis weight makes it sensitive to kinking. I've had no QC problems with the Ilford Gold Silk in both sheets and rolls. Both bronzing and GD are definite problems with the Ilford and K3 inks, but with Paul's new 3MK-PK workflow neither are a problem for B&W printing. Carl On Feb 13, 2008, at 12:52 PM, wwodets wrote: > Carl and Gabriel- > > Carl, > > What is it you didn't like about the Harman? With the Ilford I found > such bad quality control (mostly surface scratching) that I gave up > on it. I liked the surface though, because it is smooth and not at > all glossy. On the other hand, the gloss differential in highlights > was quite obvious because the k3 inks are quite glossy. The gloss > differential with the Harman is minimal. > > Gabriel, > > I am still awaiting my first box of 17 x 25, and I'm not likely to > print larger than that. I was not aware it was available in rolls, > but I imagine it would be a curling problem. It has very much the > stiffness of a gelatin paper. > > Walt > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Gabriel Valansi > <gvalansi@...> wrote: >> >> Hey Walt: did you try to print B/W on the Harman in big sizes > (beyond >> 17x22�)? IT is available in rolls? >> >> >> >> El 12/2/08 18:56, "wwodets" <odets@...> escribi�: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Gabriel- >>> >>> I'm with you on the HM Baryta. The whole surface glitters and > sparkles >>> under the light, and is particularly bad in high density areas. > These >>> look like someone sprayed black vinyl onto the paper. I can't >>> understand why they did this. The Epson EFB has some of this, > but much >>> less and is acceptable to me, though not my favorite. The Harman >>> surface (with K3 inks) is a bit glossier than I'd like but the > surface >>> is very natural and convincing and the inks are beautiful on it. > No >>> glitter at all and not quite a glossy "air-dried," but something > very >>> good, convincing and honest in itself. It shows a photograph >>> beautifully. >>> >>> Walt >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >> > > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other > resources as they are often being updated. > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you > wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by > visiting this same page. > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages > to keep them short. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or > flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed > from the membership without notice. > - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital > B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be > removed from the membership. > - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules > and guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the > group Owner and Moderators. See �Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines� > in the Files section: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > > BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE > PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE > �OWNER� AND �MODERATORS� OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL > NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, > CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, > DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER > INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE �OWNER� AND �MODERATORS� OF DIGITAL > BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF > SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE > THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO > OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR > CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO > GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE > PRINT YAHOO GROUP. > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2008-02-13 by Gabriel Valansi
Walt: I saw the Harman 44” roll in a store list (climaxdigital.com). I´m in Buenos Aires, so far to try and make mistakes ordering the wrong size of paper. What about that possible curling problem?. Would be very noticeable? El 13/2/08 14:52, "wwodets" <odets@...> escribió: > > > > > Carl and Gabriel- > > Carl, > > What is it you didn't like about the Harman? With the Ilford I found > such bad quality control (mostly surface scratching) that I gave up > on it. I liked the surface though, because it is smooth and not at > all glossy. On the other hand, the gloss differential in highlights > was quite obvious because the k3 inks are quite glossy. The gloss > differential with the Harman is minimal. > > Gabriel, > > I am still awaiting my first box of 17 x 25, and I'm not likely to > print larger than that. I was not aware it was available in rolls, > but I imagine it would be a curling problem. It has very much the > stiffness of a gelatin paper. > > Walt > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> , Gabriel Valansi > <gvalansi@...> wrote: >> > >> > Hey Walt: did you try to print B/W on the Harman in big sizes > (beyond >> > 17x22²)? IT is available in rolls? >> > >> > >> > >> > El 12/2/08 18:56, "wwodets" <odets@...> escribió: >> > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > Gabriel- >>> > > >>> > > I'm with you on the HM Baryta. The whole surface glitters and > sparkles >>> > > under the light, and is particularly bad in high density areas. > These >>> > > look like someone sprayed black vinyl onto the paper. I can't >>> > > understand why they did this. The Epson EFB has some of this, > but much >>> > > less and is acceptable to me, though not my favorite. The Harman >>> > > surface (with K3 inks) is a bit glossier than I'd like but the > surface >>> > > is very natural and convincing and the inks are beautiful on it. > No >>> > > glitter at all and not quite a glossy "air-dried," but something > very >>> > > good, convincing and honest in itself. It shows a photograph >>> > > beautifully. >>> > > >>> > > Walt >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >> > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2008-02-13 by wwodets
Gabriel- I've printed only about 100 sheets in 13 x 19, so I'm not sure about the roll. These sheets are fine. I'm just guessing from the "hand" of the paper that curling might be a problem. It takes a set more like gelatin paper than cotton paper does. I think Carl is probably right about very large sizes and "kinking." I should be doing some 17 x 25 shortly. Walt --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Gabriel Valansi <gvalansi@...> wrote: > > Walt: > > I saw the Harman 44â roll in a store list (climaxdigital.com). I´m in Buenos > Aires, so far to try and make mistakes ordering the wrong size of paper. > What about that possible curling problem?. Would be very noticeable? > > > El 13/2/08 14:52, "wwodets" <odets@...> escribió: > > > > > > > > > > > Carl and Gabriel- > > > > Carl, > > > > What is it you didn't like about the Harman? With the Ilford I found > > such bad quality control (mostly surface scratching) that I gave up > > on it. I liked the surface though, because it is smooth and not at > > all glossy. On the other hand, the gloss differential in highlights > > was quite obvious because the k3 inks are quite glossy. The gloss > > differential with the Harman is minimal. > > > > Gabriel, > > > > I am still awaiting my first box of 17 x 25, and I'm not likely to > > print larger than that. I was not aware it was available in rolls, > > but I imagine it would be a curling problem. It has very much the > > stiffness of a gelatin paper. > > > > Walt > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > > <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> , Gabriel Valansi > > <gvalansi@> wrote: > >> > > >> > Hey Walt: did you try to print B/W on the Harman in big sizes > > (beyond > >> > 17x22²)? IT is available in rolls? > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > El 12/2/08 18:56, "wwodets" <odets@> escribió: > >> > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > Gabriel- > >>> > > > >>> > > I'm with you on the HM Baryta. The whole surface glitters and > > sparkles > >>> > > under the light, and is particularly bad in high density areas. > > These > >>> > > look like someone sprayed black vinyl onto the paper. I can't > >>> > > understand why they did this. The Epson EFB has some of this, > > but much > >>> > > less and is acceptable to me, though not my favorite. The Harman > >>> > > surface (with K3 inks) is a bit glossier than I'd like but the > > surface > >>> > > is very natural and convincing and the inks are beautiful on it. > > No > >>> > > glitter at all and not quite a glossy "air-dried," but something > > very > >>> > > good, convincing and honest in itself. It shows a photograph
> >>> > > beautifully. > >>> > > > >>> > > Walt > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
2008-02-13 by wwodets
Carl- I'm not familiar with the 3MK-PK workflow but I gather this must be three MIS inks with the Epson PK. I'll search the forum on the term. Walt --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Carl Schofield <list@...> wrote:
> > Walt, > > The Harman gloss is more than I would prefer and with larger sheets, > the relatively low basis weight makes it sensitive to kinking. I've > had no QC problems with the Ilford Gold Silk in both sheets and > rolls. Both bronzing and GD are definite problems with the Ilford > and K3 inks, but with Paul's new 3MK-PK workflow neither are a > problem for B&W printing. > > Carl >
2008-02-13 by Carl Schofield
Walt, This long thread: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/ message/90525 Yes, essentially MIS Eboni(x3) + Glop + PK Carl On Feb 13, 2008, at 4:18 PM, wwodets wrote: > Carl- > > I'm not familiar with the 3MK-PK workflow but I gather this must be > three MIS inks with the Epson PK. I'll search the forum on the term. > > Walt > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Carl Schofield > <list@...> wrote: >> >> Walt, >> >> The Harman gloss is more than I would prefer and with larger sheets, >> the relatively low basis weight makes it sensitive to kinking. I've >> had no QC problems with the Ilford Gold Silk in both sheets and >> rolls. Both bronzing and GD are definite problems with the Ilford >> and K3 inks, but with Paul's new 3MK-PK workflow neither are a >> problem for B&W printing. >> >> Carl >> > > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other > resources as they are often being updated. > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you > wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by > visiting this same page. > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages > to keep them short. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or > flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed > from the membership without notice. > - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital > B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be > removed from the membership. > - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules > and guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the > group Owner and Moderators. See �Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines� > in the Files section: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > > BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE > PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE > �OWNER� AND �MODERATORS� OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL > NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, > CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, > DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER > INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE �OWNER� AND �MODERATORS� OF DIGITAL > BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF > SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE > THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO > OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR > CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO > GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE > PRINT YAHOO GROUP. > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2008-02-14 by Scott Jones
Thanks Walt for all your posts. I will be very interested in your reports on the 17x25 inch sheets. It seems like this is the only sheet available that will take a 16x24 image. I am just starting to play with 8.5x11 samples and am still waiting for an email back from Harman comfirming my registration with them so I can download their profiles for my R2400 printer. Do they normally take a long time to get back to a registrant? It is just less than 24 hours now. Perhaps they do it by hand and I got caught in the time difference. Thanks again for your continuing posts. http://www.scottjonesphoto.com
2008-02-14 by Paul Grant
My experience is the registration process is almost instantaneous? Paul
From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Scott Jones Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 10:01 PM To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Epson Exhibition Fiber - A Review Thanks Walt for all your posts. I will be very interested in your reports on the 17x25 inch sheets. It seems like this is the only sheet available that will take a 16x24 image. I am just starting to play with 8.5x11 samples and am still waiting for an email back from Harman comfirming my registration with them so I can download their profiles for my R2400 printer. Do they normally take a long time to get back to a registrant? It is just less than 24 hours now. Perhaps they do it by hand and I got caught in the time difference. Thanks again for your continuing posts. http://www.scottjonesphoto.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]