I like 35mm and 6x9, but these are a modern aspect. 4x5 is just as important and old Elwood 8x10 enlargers are not totally passe. 16x20 is an important print standard. gar *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** On 2/12/08 at 9:19 AM stephengledhill wrote: >I understand the 17"x22" size is simply 4 times the area or twice the >linear >dimensions of the standard 8.5"x11" US letter size paper. The fact that it >accommodates a 16"x20" image is coincidental. > >Almost all of the sheets papers which are 17" wide are 22" long - but >there's one exception that I'm aware of (there may well be others) and >that's the Harman FB Al which is 25" long. As someone pointed out, making >it the ideal aspect ratio of 2:3 35mm film format images printed at >16"x24". > >Steve Gledhill >www.virtuallygrey.co.uk > >*********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** > >The size is for 16x20 prints - the standard since I was born. > >gar > >*********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** > >On 2/11/08 at 9:09 PM Scott Jones wrote: > >>Aproximately the same price as at Atlex also ( for EEF that is) >> >>One question though. Why is the 17" sheet in the dimesion of 17x22? >> >>A dSLR aspect ration image would size out to 16x24 which will not make >>it onto this sheet. Are all 17" papers this short??? >> >>http://www.scottjon <http://www.scottjonesphoto.com/> esphoto.com > > > >[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > >Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as >they are often being updated. > >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > >If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to >unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same >page. > >Please follow these basic guidelines: >- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep >them short. >- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. >Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the >membership without notice. >- Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W >printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from >the membership. >- By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and >guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner >and Moderators. See �Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines� in the Files >section: >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > >BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT >YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE �OWNER� AND >�MODERATORS� OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO >YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR >EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF >PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE >�OWNER� AND �MODERATORS� OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN >ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE >OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) >UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) >STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT >YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE >PRINT YAHOO GROUP. > >Yahoo! Groups Links > > >
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Epson Exhibition Fiber - A Review OT rant
2008-02-12 by Gary Weaver
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.