Tony, Thanks for the description. I imagine that the HP inks are looking very different on the Harman than the K3 inks (with MIS carbon in the yellow position) that I am using. These produce no bronzing on the Harman and only the slightest GD. So perhaps the GE on the HP is correcting a problem that I don't see with the K3 inks, at least on this paper. The sheet feeding problem on the Z3100 is mentioned often--what is it? I use a 4800 and front loading and find it quite convenient. Thanks, Walt --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Tony Sleep <TonySleep@...> wrote: > > On 18/02/2008 wwodets wrote: > > I've gone through all the Z3100 posts and found little actually > > describing the appearance of the GE. How would you describe the > > appearance in terms of color and gloss level? Has anyone used this > > with the Harman Gloss FB AI? Used over the entire surface, does the GE > > raise or lower the gloss as compared to the straight Harman paper in > > unprinted areas? Compared to other of the gloss papers? Does it raise > > or lower the gloss of the inks? Is this a high gloss surface, a satin, > > etc.? > > I have seen Z3100 Harman FB AL gloss prints done using black+gray+GO. > Overall they are pretty successful. The GO eliminates 80% of the bronzing > and GD that Vivera black & grey produces on this paper without GO. You > have to look quite closely to see any trace of bronzing, and these prints > are the closest I have yet seen to wet darkroom prints. > > If anything tone is a little too neutral. Bromides tended to be either > warm or cold, and the Z3100 samples were just a little sterile for my > taste. They reminded me of the original Seagull Oriental in Dektol in that > respect, which I preferred after selenium toning. > > Aside from that, there is still a slight residual sense that the image is > sat on the surface rather than within the emulsion. But they are, as I > say, very close to FB bromides and I doubt most people would notice. > > The GO appears pretty much clear. I don't recall any sense of yellowing, > but whether that would change with time I don't know. The coating itself > is very thin and adds a little gloss but without changing the slight > surface texture. The application did not look completely even, even though > it was a full rather than economy/selective coating. Without be able to > pin this down, I remember thinking that the coating looked like a coating > rather than an integral part of the surface. I was told - by the guy who'd > been testing - that they had a few issues with adhesion of the GO on > Harman, but the 2 prints I saw were OK and showed no flaking except at the > cut edge where it had been trimmed after printing. > > Overall highly impressive and very promising. But I think it might work > even better with one of the Innova papers - Fibaprint White Gloss, > Warmtone Gloss or Ultra Smooth Gloss White. The surface of the first two > is slightly less glossy than the Harman and a little more 'textured' with > the Ultra Smooth down the middle. I've experimented with this latter paper > (on a B9180) and (aside from an occasional overinking issue) it achieves a > better Dmax than the Harman. Innova tell me the White Gloss and Warmtone > Gloss work better with Vivera but I haven't yet tried the samples I have. > > -- > Regards > > Tony Sleep > http://tonysleep.co.uk >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Questions on the appearance of the Z3100 Gloss Enhancer
2008-02-18 by wwodets
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.