I don't know what's "wiser" for HP...they design and price for marketing reasons...I doubt it costs 5X (FIVE TIMES!) to make a $3500 Z3100 Vs a $700 9180. Materials, research, and electronics are not that much different....the bigger machines must be hugely profitable by comparison to the smaller (but far more often sold). When Epson upgrades from 2400, HP will add gloss optimizer or something electronic to 9180 equivalent...no need now, just a matter of relative cost of advertising...adv dollars are a big part of each Epson (and Canon), smaller part of each HP (my guess...HP seems little advertised). IMO if HP wants to sell more machines, they'll waste more more in advertising. IMO top desktop Epson's aren't sold on the basis of advertising, more on the basis of buzz and reviews. Delete Reply Forward --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Ernst Dinkla <E.Dinkla@...> wrote: > > djon43 wrote: > > > > > > There seem to be no current rumors of a Z-series 13" , like HP2100 and > > HP3100...anybody heard any recently? > > In think HP would be wiser to launch a 17" model based on a > 10 channel inkset, a hybrid between the B9180 and the Z3100. > With calibration but without profiling. Gloss enhancer > aboard and an extra grey or dark red ink in the 10th > inkline. Or a two component gloss enhancer for a harder > coating. There's no Vivera pigment printer at that width and > one in between the Canon iPF5100 and the Epson 3800 in price > would be nice. 65 ML carts would fit that machine too. > > > -- > Met vriendelijke groeten, Ernst > > > | Dinkla Grafische Techniek | > | www.pigment-print.com | > | ( unvollendet ) | >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] HP b9180 Vs Epson 2400 comparison
2008-02-18 by djon43
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.