Harold Jackson wrote: > Ernst -- I think you're taking the black hole analogy to an extreme. No one has ever been in or near a black hole. All we have are theoretical constructs of the behavior of matter in black holes. My guess is that all known chemical properties of matter would be different in or close to a black hole. Naturally, as carbon based life-forms, that includes us humans. > > So, you're in a black hole - glossy, schmossy, who cares what kind of paper you use!! (My (admittedly silly) 2 cents.) I tried to visualise what it would look like. And it is correct what Paul writes about gloss black that its Dmax works as long as there's no light reflecting in your eyes from that surface. Due to the imperfection of that gloss surface and a normal Dmax (there will be diffuse light reflected to a degree) you will still have a visual impression of a surface you are looking at, even at the best angle for Dmax. Like the matte surface that shows its texture, how fine it may be, by the random deflection of light. I actually expect that you get a strange impression with that kind of high light absorptions, more or less a disappearance of surface and by that no association with gloss or matte. The article mentioned "being at night in a dark wood" if I recall it correctly. I do not get that picture sketched associated with gloss or matte. A black sky with stars isn't gloss or matte either. Imagine a black only print with the carbon nanotubes and some contrasty parts in the image, I think you will get a 3 dimensional effect with the white parts more or less floating in front of the black. The same you saw at kinetic - optical art exhibitions but without the black velvet box with white cords in front of it. This time as flat as a postcard. Of course all that if it would be possible to print a layer like that. It doesn't say anything about layer thickness and opacity. If you can not get the white paper blocked by a 10 micron thick layer of it then it is not practical. Deposing the tubes at the right angle on dark matter in labs is nice for optical instruments but translates bad to printers. So despite the smiley I was serious. -- Met vriendelijke groeten,Ernst | Dinkla Grafische Techniek | | www.pigment-print.com | | ( unvollendet ) |
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: A new dMax to match...
2008-02-20 by Ernst Dinkla
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.