Tyler, I do lot of 30x40 and 40x60 prints and multiples of the same image. If I had to order sheets I simply wouldn't be in business anymore. I agree that for things up to 17x22 sheets are really a breeze, but a huge portion of my work is either larger than that, or multiple prints of the same image. If I had to stand there and feed 100 sheets in the printer that too would put me out of business. I'd have to double my prices. I have done three portfolios in the last year that contained around 25 editions of around 30 prints each. They were done with Photorag primarily and all done with groups on a roll of about 44x60" and derolled at that size. They were all fine and it made the job worth doing for me. I still would like to have a giant dry mount press though. That would be sweet. John y attempt resulted in some kind of > > > kink. > > > > ??????????? > > > > I have never had a problem reverse rolling German Etching, never. > > Sounds like you need a different tool for the job. My suggestion is to > > buy some really super cheap canvas (50+ inches wide). Unroll a length, > > insert print, roll back up and leave it for 20 minutes or so. If the > > canvas gets dirty, cut off the dirty portion and toss it or use it for > > packing material. Don't think I've even done this on larger than 30x40 > > inches, so if you go a lot bigger it may be a bit more of an issue > > > > That said, assuming that your inks are waterproof, get a garment > > steamer and try steaming the German Etching, or Photo Rag. You'd be > > surprised what you can put these papers through and still have a > > perfect print. If you put a cover sheet over the ink, a steam press > > should work fine to flatten the paper before mounting. It little bit of > > added humidity will make the paper very forgiving. > > > > And just for the record, I have not tried steam pressing any of my > > prints. But I have soaked them in the hottest water that comes from the > > tap, steamed them with a garment steamer, and just generally abused > > them. GE, PhotoRag, Photorag luster, several of the Hawk Mountain > > papers, a couple of the canvas materials, and a few other matte papers > > show few signs of damage from steam and water with Image Specialists > > pigment inks. I even measured a profile target before and after the > > print dried again and saw little change. Steaming Photo Rag Luster will > > make the entire surface have about the same amount of gloss. > > >
Message
Re: Epson Velvet Fine Art Super Permanent in Sheets Only?
2008-02-23 by john dean
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.