Tyler- Oddly I have had exactly the opposite experience with VFA. After thousands of prints on 13 x 19 and hundreds on 17 x 22 I have never had any flaking problem whatsoever. I compare it to Ultrasmooth, which is also flake-free and Photo Rag which is a problem in this regard. I have also shipped perhaps a hundred VFA prints rolled, in tubes, and have never had a problem with it or with flattening it for framing on the other end. I have never used roll paper in my 4800 because of the handling problems and don't do a volume of work that makes it necessary. Walt --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Tyler Boley" <tyler@...> wrote: > > John, wouldn't it be a handling problem? I've had my hands on this > stuff once or twice and it seemed a bit "board" like to roll without > problems. It's also one of the worst flakers I've seen, so Drolling > and the rest of the somewhat brutal handling to get the thing flatter > could also be problematic... > ? > I agree though, nice stuff, at least they could make larger sheets. > Tyler > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "john dean" > <deanwork2003@> wrote: > > > > I just reflected again on the fact that Wilhelm has the best black and > > white permanency rating for the Epson Velvet Fine Art paper with > > Ultrachrome inks (no uv spray coating). That is 406 wilhelm years > > under glass compared to 100 years less for the Premier Art Hotpress > > with the same inks AND a uv coating. > > > > http://www.wilhelm-research.com/epson/9880.html > > > > That's pretty signigicant, especially when one considers that the dmax > > with Ultrachrome is way beyond all the other matte rag papers out > > there. ( not true with Cone inks however, :-( ). Anyone who has tried > > to match the deep black with Ultrachomre on any Hahnemuhle paper knows > > exactly what I'm talking about. It isn't even close with UC. > > > > Can ANYONE think of a reason this paper is not being offered in rolls? > > Is is that damn fragile? To me it has a superior texture and gamut to > > Somerset Velvet with far greater stability ratings and dmax? But 17x22 > > is the limit. Strange indeed. > > > > > > > > > http://www.epson.com/cgi-bin/Store/ProductMediaSpec.jsp? BV_UseBVCookie=yes&infoType=Overview&oid=-9824&category=Paper+% 26+Media > > > > > > > > > > John > > >
Message
Re: Epson Velvet Fine Art Super Permanent in Sheets Only?
2008-02-24 by wwodets
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.