My $0.002 LR: I really like Lightroom because it makes more sense to the photographer in me (he's in there somewhere). I particularly liked how easy it was to select a group of images and convert them for other purposes (photo frames, facebook, etc.). UI is very good (not perfect yet). All edits on RAW get stuck in XMP files (you don't ever have to hit save) - if that's what you want, or you can store in their catalog. I'm neutral on that but it's a very fast and easy way to go. B&W conversion is very easy, split toning can be fun. BUT - no soft proofing and poor sharpening, and printing, well, let's say it sucks and since I decided to start printing my digital photos, that's the deal breaker. I let my demo expire. Maybe V2? PSE: I have used PS Elements since the free copy I got with my Rebel (and that was good for a big discount on PS). I have about 11,000 pictures fully cataloged and now I can easily find pictures of, say, my wife+her dog+snow for example and I do use that feature all the time. I'm sticking with it for organization and recently updated to version 6. It uses Camera Raw 4.x so as far as that goes, it has the same capabilities as PS. I like that I can launch PS easily and PSE makes a copy first without me having to think about it. UI is good to very good (set it to go directly to organizer). Downloader app for Windows is very good. Editor - like PS only less of it (which might be a good thing) but I rarely use it. It supports some plug-ins but I haven't experimented. I also haven't played with the "Sharing" feature but looks like it might be a winner. Bonus - Windows Vista Photo Gallery read most of the keywords and the ones it didn't get were probably due to a procedural problem long ago in PSE. Cons: Printing - nah, same reasons above (output sharpening, no soft proofing). PS CS3: Soft proofing, infinite sharpening possiblities (I use PhotoKit Sharpener because otherwise my head hurts), and finally printing with the latest HP driver. Since paper & ink are expensive, it's a good thing to take your time. And that's what it takes to learn the advanced editing capabilities. I don't think I can remove this from my workflow. Cons: Adobe Raw has better/easier tools like Grayscale conversion (same as LR) but once you jump to PS, it's different. Organizational capabilites? Stick to PSE - Bridge doesn't really do much. Have to keep track of file saves, need lots of system (memory, disk). UI - improving but still uniquely Adobe :( QImage: takes up the slack for PSE and LR as far as printing (and output sharpening) and soft proofing. If you can stand the inscrutable UI. It has the potential to make much better prints, and I saw (almost) true colors on one of my test prints for the first time on my older HP 7960. If you can figure out the various save/preset options, this can be a huge win if you have multiple printers or multiple papers (who doesn't)? Also excels for multiple prints in one shot (same or different sizes). I've also used Digital Image Pro (it's not terrible), but PSE6 is better for photo stuff. low cost route: PSE6 (about $80 unless you got it at Costco last month for $49) + QImage ($35-49). medium: LR but wait for the next version or buy QImage too. high cost route: PS CS3 + plug-ins. (Take advantage of the upgrade pricing from PSE if you can.)
Message
[Digital BW] Re: What Software to Use
2008-03-02 by goldner_jeff
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.