Hello Michael, >During this discussion of signing and mounting prints the term >"reveal" has come up several times. In reading these posts I've >managed to get confused as to what the "reveal" actually is and I'm >wondering if everyone is using the term consistently. How about a >few explanations to clarify this term? Thanks. My understanding of it is the same as Eric's, that it can apply to both trimmed borders, common when dry-mounting emulsion prints, and non-trimmed borders with fully revealed image, more common today with digital prints not dry-mounted. In an earlier post I mentioned that ensuring that no damaged print edges are hidden by the mat as one reason buyers/dealers like this way of matting (as well as ensuring the image is not cropped by the mat and the image dimensions being verifiable). These are things I heard discussed years ago in my darkroom days. I'm wondering if with today's common approach of the print paper's edge being covered makes any difference to buyers and dealers. With the image fully revealed the other two things are still ensurable. Has anyone had any feedback from dealers or gallery owners about this? Regards, Clayton Info on black and white digital printing at http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm I-Trak 2.0 coming soon
Message
Re: Signing Prints
2008-03-10 by Clayton Jones
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.