I use the brightness and contrast sliders in the print dialog box to match my print to what I see on the screen. (BTW I have gone through the gamma routine and have adjusted my monitor to a step wedge.) I can't remember the exact settings I use, but they remain the same for each print -- at least so far -- and I haven't had any resultant problems with posterizing, banding, etc. That said, I may experiment with a gamma adjustment, just to see how effective that is. Chris --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., Todd Flashner <tflash@e...> wrote: > > > 1) According to Paul's workflow, I should be using the > > Photoshop 5 default color settings in PS 6. This brings up the > > question as to whether I should be assigning a profile to my > > image file before I edit it. For example, if it's an RGB file, do I > > bring it in untagged (no color management) or do I assign the > > working space, i.e., sRGB? When I convert the file to grayscale, > > PS assigns the PS5 default grayscale profile, gamma 2.2. Since > > I'm on a Mac, shouldn't I be assigning it a gamma of 1.8? Should > > I be saving my grayscale file with an imbedded profile or not? > > Sounds like you are scanning in RGB, then converting to Grayscale, then back > to RGB? If so you can probably skip the conversion to grayscale by using > Monochromatic in Channel Mixer. > > If your sRGB is set up as your color working space in PS Color Settings > you'll be fine, you won't need to "assign" a profile, it'll be done for you. > BTW, as I use Adobe RGB as my color working space I've chosen to use it for > my VM space as well with good results. > > If you do want to convert to grayscale (or if you scan in grayscale) you are > probably best served to use gamma 2.2 because sRGB is a gamma 2.2 color > space, so there'll be less shift when you convert between them. > > Don't worry about the Mac "being" gamma 1.8, to my understanding that's more > convention than anything in the hardware, and even the convention has > changed. Many highend prepress people, retouchers etc, use AdobeRGB, which > is gamma 2.2 and even calibrate their monitors to 6500K, gamma 2.2. > > > 2) In the Epson Printer dialog, do any of you use the Brightness > > or Contrast sliders, or should this be left at 0? > > I haven't used them but I think others do. > > > 3) The reason for question number 2 is that my prints seem a bit > > less contrasty (particularly in the shadows) and maybe slightly > > lighter then when I view them on the monitor (I'm assuming that > > my monitor is calibrated correctly). In one of Paul's text files, he > > mentions using the Black (RGB) curve of his curve set to adjust > > for monitor to print matching. Won't this affect or alter the > > separate R-G-B curves in a non-linear fashion? Placing a point > > in the center of the Black curve should just affect the mid-tones, > > no? I just want to adjust the gamma so that my prints come out a > > bit darker, like what I see on the monitor. How do I do this? > > If you want to be a purist, just make a separate adjustment layer for this > gamma tweak and set it's blend mode to luminosity. That keeps the colors > from being effected. I always make sure that Paul's VM curves are at the > topmost layer in the stack, which helps too. > > Todd
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Roark, VM ink on EAM, Epson 870, Profiles, and Mac
2002-02-06 by tzinzunzan2000
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.