Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

RE: [Digital BW] more detail with EEM than with PhotoRag(?)

2008-04-14 by E Neilsen

Might even try keeping that paper a touch dryer, in a lower relative
humidity than EEM. And yes, the 188 is smoother than the 308 but not a night
and day different. 

 

Eric Neilsen Photo

4101 Commerce Street, Suite 9

Dallas, TX 75226

214 827-8301

 

http://ericneilsenphotography.com

SKype ejprinter

 

  _____  

From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Clayton
Jones
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2008 2:37 PM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] more detail with EEM than with PhotoRag(?)

 

Hello Joost,

>I'm using HPR 308, which is indeed somewhat rougher than EEM. But 
>I'm surprised if this could explain the difference?? 

A rougher surface is often softer and will have more bleed, or dot
gain (an ink droplet will spread out and lose it's hard edge to some
degree). That's probably what you're seeing.

Regards,
Clayton

Info on black and white digital printing at 
http://www.cjcom. <http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm> net/digiprnarts.htm
I-Trak 2.1 http://www.cjcom. <http://www.cjcom.net/itrak.htm> net/itrak.htm



 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.