Might even try keeping that paper a touch dryer, in a lower relative humidity than EEM. And yes, the 188 is smoother than the 308 but not a night and day different. Eric Neilsen Photo 4101 Commerce Street, Suite 9 Dallas, TX 75226 214 827-8301 http://ericneilsenphotography.com SKype ejprinter _____ From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Clayton Jones Sent: Monday, April 14, 2008 2:37 PM To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Digital BW] more detail with EEM than with PhotoRag(?) Hello Joost, >I'm using HPR 308, which is indeed somewhat rougher than EEM. But >I'm surprised if this could explain the difference?? A rougher surface is often softer and will have more bleed, or dot gain (an ink droplet will spread out and lose it's hard edge to some degree). That's probably what you're seeing. Regards, Clayton Info on black and white digital printing at http://www.cjcom. <http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm> net/digiprnarts.htm I-Trak 2.1 http://www.cjcom. <http://www.cjcom.net/itrak.htm> net/itrak.htm [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
RE: [Digital BW] more detail with EEM than with PhotoRag(?)
2008-04-14 by E Neilsen
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.