Thanks Paul, I did use your test chart. As a matter of fact I created one with 8 eught different gray levels. I'll upload it to file section. Frankly, I'm a bit gobsmacked now. The test charts hardly show any differences. Both papers don't have a problem to resolve 7.2 /p/mm and both can borderline manage 14.4 lp/mm. IF any difference, than perhaps wins the comparison, but it's very hard to tell. So I'm not sure what's happened with my earlier prints. Perhaps difference is moisteaization effecting the bleed? Find it difficult to understand as both papers are stored in the same room. I'll guess I have to monitor my results closely in the come period. Thanks all for trying to help! Joost --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "pr_roark" <pr_roark@...> wrote: > > > >...With "better" I mean "sharper" or "more detail". > > You might be able to get an objective handle on this by printing a > resolution chart like this: > http://www.paulroark.com/BW-Info/Res_chart.zip > with each paper. Have the printer set to it's top resolution/quality > mode. > > Paul > www.PaulRoark.com >
Message
Re: more detail with EEM than with PhotoRag(?)
2008-04-15 by Joost Horsten
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.