My personal experience, for what it's worth (one and a half year of digital B&W printing), is that (with a well calibrated system and paper that I'm familiar with) I can get close enough for a good print of a "normal" image. But if "good" is not good enough or with an image that is very demanding for either very dark or very light tones I need some (2-6) iterations to get it right. At certain moments I think I face the limit that in the end a monitor is a light emitting image, while a photo is light reflecting. Joost --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Louis de Stoutz <loudest@...> wrote: > > Hi folks! > > This is a follow-up question to my monitor question (thanks for the > first replies): > > When I am in the darkroom, I print many test-strips to get what I want. > Is this being done in digital B&W too? Saving ink and paper (and time) > certainly prevents from printing too many full test-pictures. Or does > WYSIWYG with a reasonable monitor get you close enough to the final print? > > (You may guess my a priori "conclusion": maybe its no use to get the > absolutely best monitor, since one has to do test prints anyway...) > > And by the way, a huge "Thank You" to all the very experienced B&W > workers amongst you for your fantastic contributions! > > Louis >
Message
Re: How much WYSIWYG is feasible?
2008-04-24 by Joost Horsten
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.