> >...does WYSIWYG with a reasonable monitor get you close > > enough to the final print? > ... perfect WYSIWYG isn't possible because of the > difference between illumination and reflected light, > but it's good enough that I can do most of the work > on screen before making the first print. ... I agree with the others. Calibration and a "color managed" workflow really help. For QTR the use of Roy's ICCs in soft proofing usually get me very close also. On the other hand, I think a perfectionist probably still can do better with a custom dot gain curver, but I'm not sure many bother with that. Another factor is the lighting levels in the lightroom as well as final display setting. I notice the latest monitor calibration units appear to be measuring ambient light. That should help that end, if the light is constant. I have a light in my office that has the exact same illumination level as the gallery where I display most often. This really helps, particularly with getting the deep shadows where I want them. I also have to remember that the glazing takes its toll, so viewing the test prints behind some acrylic (or in a clear bag) gets me closer in the print shadows. Paul www.PaulRoark.com
Message
Re: How much WYSIWYG is feasible?
2008-04-24 by pr_roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.