Carl Schofield is the person who will be better able to answer this question. I've done very little with the 3PK approach. I'm doing mostly 3MK with the 1800, and will probably put a little more effort in the 3MK+PK+Glop workflow when I have some time. Paul www.PaulRoark.com --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "steveabrink" <steveabrink@...> wrote: > > Hi Paul, > > Hope you don't mind me asking a rather subjective question about the > Epson 1800 new 3PK setup for gloss prints. I'm a Epson 3800 ABW & QTR > user and have been mostly happy w/ the output, but I'm always > wondering, OK, what next...? I'm pretty curious about this Epson 1800 > 3pk setup for gloss prints. I read your article and it sounds like it > makes great outout except for perhaps, a bit less smoothness in the > midtones (?) -- at least the ink patterns I saw. I'm a small user of > matte papers because I typically like a bit more punch -- although the > gloss differential is still annoying as compared to darkroom prints. > And I like the idea of 100% carbon based inks but thats not enough... > What are thoughts, if you don't mind, on prints made on your 4800 K3 > setup as opposed to the Epson 1800 gloss ink setup. Is there in your > opinion, and I hope its OK to ask, a discernable improvement in the > quality of the print? > > Thanks much! > Steve >
Message
Re: ? for Paul Roark
2008-04-29 by pr_roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.