Hello Arthur, >But I see other photographers signing and numbering just the print, >and cutting an overmat with a larger opening so that the signature >on the print shows. Also, there's a bit of space showing around the >rest of the print. >I'm told that galleries prefer this... I remember these questions being asked years ago when I got started. I was told that this was called a floating mount and has been the gallery/vintage print dealer preference for a lot of years. If I remember the reasons correctly it goes something like this: 1) Image is not cropped by the mat, the idea being that the the photographer's intended composition is shown and has not been changed by some later mat cutter's preference. 2) In the case of a trimmed dry mounted print, ensures that no damaged print edges are hidden by the mat. 3) Exact dimensions of the image can be verified. 4) Assuming there is a signature outside the border of the image (either on the mount board of a dry mounted print or a print that has some border remaining), the signature is visible and stays with the print, even if the mat is later discarded. > So ... before matting and framing for three shows, I'm asking here >... what do you do, and why? I continue to use the floating mount with my ink prints, but not dry mounted (dry mounting was necessary for emulsion prints because they curled). Why? I guess because it looks very elegant and professional to me. I like having a title and signature showing in the reveal area (I don't like signing mats and not all prints I sell are matted). It's also a lot easier without dry mounting because the print can be hinge-taped to the underside of the mat. Regards, Clayton Info on black and white digital printing at http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm I-Trak 2.1 http://www.cjcom.net/itrak.htm
Message
Re: Sign the mat, or jut the print (and cut bigger mat opening)
2008-05-02 by Clayton Jones
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.