Hi Arthur.I do the same as Clayton and most often use the floating mat method. I make the reveal equal on top and sides and leave just slightly more on the bottom so the title and/or signature are not cramped looking. The exception is if I print or trim to a full bleed image where I sign and date/copyright directly in an unobtrusive spot on the lower right corner. These are almost always low key images with dark corners. Regards Duane --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Arthur Fink <af@...> wrote: > > I always sign my prints, but then I cut an overmat with opening > slightly smaller than the printed image. I also sign the mat. > > But I see other photographers signing and numbering just the print, > and cutting an overmat with a larger opening so that the signature on > the print shows. Also, there's a bit of space showing around the > rest of the print. > > I'm told that galleries prefer this, although visually I tend to > prefer seeing the mat opening right against the edges of the print > (with perhaps 1/16" of the print hidden). > > So ... before matting and framing for three shows, I'm asking here > ... what do you do, and why? > > Arthur Fink > > A r t h u r . F i n k . P h o t o g r a p h y > ------------------------------------------------- > Ten New Island Avenue . land 207.766.5722 > Peaks Island, Maine 04108 . cell 207.615.5722 > www.arthurfinkphoto.com . af@... > > More dance images www.f64gallery.com/arthur.html > www.arthurfinkphoto.com/BatesShow2007 > > > "Dance Distraction -- An outbreak of movement in an unusual or > choreographically > under-used location, especially ... spontaneous frolic evoking a > joyous response." >
Message
Re: Sign the mat, or jut the print (and cut bigger mat opening)
2008-05-03 by dlruckus
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.