Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: more detail with EEM than with PhotoRag(?)

2008-05-07 by Joost Horsten

Thanks all who replied to this. 

Recent results suggest this seems to be a red herring. A resolution 
test did not show any significant differences. Moreover, while 
printing a set of identical prints (on identical paper) for a print 
exchange recently I noticed that in some prints I seemed to miss one 
or more of the darker inks, and consequently some detail. I suspect 
that some trapped air is/was the problem.

Sorry for bothering you...

Joost

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Joost Horsten" 
<j.h.j.h@...> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> 
> Normally, PhotoRag is my paper of choice and I use Epson Enhanced 
> Matte as draft paper. My default print size is A4.
>  
> Lately I'm making some smaller prints (A5-A6) with quite some 
detail. 
> And I notice that my EEM prints show clearly more detail than the 
> ones on PhotoRag. The paper is the only thing that changes. All 
> prints are made on an Epson 2100, UT3D inks, QTR. In both cases I 
use 
> the very same QTR curves (made with an Eye-One). No, I don't print 
on 
> the back side of PhotoRag - once in a while I do by mistake, and 
then 
> the difference is MUCH bigger :O).
> 
> I think I observed the same phenomenon earlier, but can not recall 
it 
> was that clear. Perhaps I notice better because of the smaller 
print 
> size? Or I got a different batch (of both PhotoRag and EEM) with 
some 
> more difference.
> 
> Have you seen the same thing?
> 
> Joost
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.