kipduff wrote: > Thanks for response- never heard of Sihl- want to get some and try. > Since I don't have a Z3100, I'll try on the 4800- not sure whether to > use matt or photo black ink cart (matt installed now). It sounds like > you're saying the Epson can't achieve this look because no gloss > enhancer or use of both blacks. How is metamerism when doing warm > tones with the Z3100? I think I'm getting some with the Epson. Your > website very interesting. Thanks...... On the Epson R1800 there's gloss enhancer so it should be possible on that printer too. There's no metamerism to speak off in either B&W or color prints from the Z3100. The Dmax on matte papers is better than that of the K3 inks. The smaller cartridge size mentioned is an optical illusion. 12 x 130 ML and a much more efficient use of inks in the Z3100 can be easily compared to the 8 x 220 ML in the Epson 9800-9880 models. With irregular printing needs big carts are not an advantage either and the ML price (30 Eurocents excl VAT) in the twin 130 ML packs is the same as Epson's 220ML cart. There's a pump in each Z3100 cart that mixes the ink thoroughly before it enters the ink tube so pigment settling is no issue. The new Epson 9900 and 7900 that I have seen on the Drupa with and without the optional spectrometer will be an extra category for Epson as I understand it. Pricing accordingly. In the first place designed for proofing in the graphic arts world. With the spectrometer the rumored price is around 8.5K dollar. A Z3100 with a spectrometer is way lower in price. On the 9900 PK and MK have each a channel to the black head but a switch is still needed as the head is shared and some ink will be lost like on the 3800. The 9880 and 7880 will stay in the catalog and they have the full channel switch which is wasting more ink. The Epson spectrometer has better specs (Fogra, with and without UV filter) that suit the proofing task excellent but the Z3100 spectrometer is working perfectly for me in art and photography printing. I bought the optional Advanced Profiling Solution to get improved results from the spectrometer though. Epsons policy on replacing heads is now even more restricting than it was before as the distributors no longer are allowed to sell directly to users. The Canon and HP models have heads that can be easily replaced by the user. That doesn't mean they do not last long. Mine are 15 months old and not a single one had to be replaced. -- Met vriendelijke groeten, Ernst | Dinkla Grafische Techniek | | www.pigment-print.com | | ( unvollendet ) |
Message
Re: [Digital BW] HP Z3100 v Epson 7880???
2008-06-09 by Ernst Dinkla
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.