Hi Andrew, Thanks for the article. I am using almost 100% rolls. I thought I'd lay out how I got to that point. I am using a 4x5 for film, and a Canon 1DsII for digital. I will probably go to a medium format digital back eventually. Most of my prints are large. I have a 7600, 9600, and a 7880. I am printing 100% with Photo Black on "photo" papers now. About 85% of my work is color. I went to using 100% rolls, all 24", to reduce the number of papers that I stock. After testing about 30 papers this past winter, I dedcided to go to Epson Premium Luster and Semi-Gloss for proofing. Epson had those on sale, buy 2 get 1 free. The net cost on the Semi- Gloss is about $57 per roll, or about $.28 per square foot, which is about the same as Epson Enhanced Matte. I also standardized on the Hahnemuhle Fine Art Baryta, Harman Gloss Ai, and Innova Glossy Warmtone for my premium papers. Also on 24" rolls. I am getting rid of all of my matte/"fine art" papers, mostly to simplify my printing. Most of my proofs and final prints have one dimension that is at least 24". If I go to smaller proofs I use Qimage and gang prints. One will still have at least a 12" side. I just don't see the point in printing/proofing smaller than that. I also use a dye ink set for proofing that costs about $25 per liter. So my 24x36 inch proofs on premium Semi-Gloss cost $1.75, about $.30 per square foot. But that is another discussion. Best, Michael
Message
Re: Article about when to use sheets vs. rolls
2008-06-19 by Michael T. Murphy
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.